<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sundance Diary: Day 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/</link>
	<description>Eric D. Snider's blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/comment-page-1/#comment-12642</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/#comment-12642</guid>
		<description>Regarding TEETH -- I just read that Lionsgate &amp; The Weinstein Co. teamed up to buy it for $2.5 million. So your prediction was half right.

It sounds like the Weinsteins at least are determined to release the movie uncut, although they have foreign rights. Lionsgate will release the movie in the States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding TEETH &#8212; I just read that Lionsgate &amp; The Weinstein Co. teamed up to buy it for $2.5 million. So your prediction was half right.</p>
<p>It sounds like the Weinsteins at least are determined to release the movie uncut, although they have foreign rights. Lionsgate will release the movie in the States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/comment-page-1/#comment-12527</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/#comment-12527</guid>
		<description>Lightly... &quot;If youâ€™re pretty sure Jesus is returning REALLY soon, you could probably stop paying your rent, too.&quot; is my choice for the funniest liine in a while...

More seriously... Global climate change is a better term than global warming, as the more credible models predict: (1) warming in most locations, (2) cooling in other locations and (3) greater variability. 

I too read Crichton&#039;s book and it just plain has the science wrong. Check the bibliography carefully and the vast majority of the main references are books not peer-reviewed scientific articles. There is no doubt that some climate scientists are skeptical of global climate change, but most of the evidence suggests otherwise. 

HOWEVER, don&#039;t take my word for it (not that you would anyway). Read it for yourself. The place to start at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (http://www.ipcc.ch/)

Keep the jokes coming Eric!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightly&#8230; &#8220;If youâ€™re pretty sure Jesus is returning REALLY soon, you could probably stop paying your rent, too.&#8221; is my choice for the funniest liine in a while&#8230;</p>
<p>More seriously&#8230; Global climate change is a better term than global warming, as the more credible models predict: (1) warming in most locations, (2) cooling in other locations and (3) greater variability. </p>
<p>I too read Crichton&#8217;s book and it just plain has the science wrong. Check the bibliography carefully and the vast majority of the main references are books not peer-reviewed scientific articles. There is no doubt that some climate scientists are skeptical of global climate change, but most of the evidence suggests otherwise. </p>
<p>HOWEVER, don&#8217;t take my word for it (not that you would anyway). Read it for yourself. The place to start at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (<a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipcc.ch/</a>)</p>
<p>Keep the jokes coming Eric!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamOndi</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/comment-page-1/#comment-12481</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamOndi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/#comment-12481</guid>
		<description>&quot;(we never see the â€œmonsterâ€?)...

By the way, the film isnâ€™t shy about showing the wounds created by the heroineâ€™s vengeful vagina (vengina?).&quot;

So I take it from this statement to mean that the film never shows the teeth-wielding vagina, but will show the wounded pepes of its victims? Eek. I am not saying that I would want to see a fang-riddled vagina, but there does seem to be a vicious double standard here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(we never see the â€œmonsterâ€?)&#8230;</p>
<p>By the way, the film isnâ€™t shy about showing the wounds created by the heroineâ€™s vengeful vagina (vengina?).&#8221;</p>
<p>So I take it from this statement to mean that the film never shows the teeth-wielding vagina, but will show the wounded pepes of its victims? Eek. I am not saying that I would want to see a fang-riddled vagina, but there does seem to be a vicious double standard here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/comment-page-1/#comment-12428</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/#comment-12428</guid>
		<description>&quot;Vengina&quot;.... Hmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Vengina&#8221;&#8230;. Hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deirdre</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/comment-page-1/#comment-12398</link>
		<dc:creator>Deirdre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/#comment-12398</guid>
		<description>&quot;Grim and horrifying for no good reason, like sleeping with Lindsay Lohan.&quot;

Hahahahahahaha. Best. Line. Ever.

Only thing wrong with it was that it wasn&#039;t in the paragraph about &quot;Teeth.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Grim and horrifying for no good reason, like sleeping with Lindsay Lohan.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hahahahahahaha. Best. Line. Ever.</p>
<p>Only thing wrong with it was that it wasn&#8217;t in the paragraph about &#8220;Teeth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandyTayler</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/comment-page-1/#comment-12389</link>
		<dc:creator>RandyTayler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/#comment-12389</guid>
		<description>Speaking of global warming, I saw &quot;An Inconvenient Truth&quot; and was very convinced, though I promised myself I&#039;d look up some rebuttals on it. (I have not done so.)

But then I read Michael Crichton&#039;s &quot;State of Fear&quot;, which has no less than one gajillion footnotes to actual science texts and such, and which says global warming is pretty nonexistent, and that the facts just don&#039;t support it.  I was swayed to his line of thinking, though I promise I&#039;ll look up some rebuttals on it.

Just, you know, FYI. 

(Of course, it still makes good sense to work our way off fossil fuels, and to reduce pollution.)

(What if we could derive energy from sitcoms? Or derive humor from them? Either of those would be awesome.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of global warming, I saw &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth&#8221; and was very convinced, though I promised myself I&#8217;d look up some rebuttals on it. (I have not done so.)</p>
<p>But then I read Michael Crichton&#8217;s &#8220;State of Fear&#8221;, which has no less than one gajillion footnotes to actual science texts and such, and which says global warming is pretty nonexistent, and that the facts just don&#8217;t support it.  I was swayed to his line of thinking, though I promise I&#8217;ll look up some rebuttals on it.</p>
<p>Just, you know, FYI. </p>
<p>(Of course, it still makes good sense to work our way off fossil fuels, and to reduce pollution.)</p>
<p>(What if we could derive energy from sitcoms? Or derive humor from them? Either of those would be awesome.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/comment-page-1/#comment-12339</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/01/20/sundance-diary-day-3-3/#comment-12339</guid>
		<description>Eric,

Enough with the pizza and Burger King.  The Windy Ridge Cafe has great food and is reasonably priced  (by Park City standards).  It&#039;s not too far from the Yarrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>Enough with the pizza and Burger King.  The Windy Ridge Cafe has great food and is reasonably priced  (by Park City standards).  It&#8217;s not too far from the Yarrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

