<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Rush Hour 3&#8242; shows China might be on to something</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/</link>
	<description>Eric D. Snider's blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: whome</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-50114</link>
		<dc:creator>whome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 22:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-50114</guid>
		<description>Isn't this another case of "if it's popular it must be good, and if not, it is bad"?  Just add that "it must therefore be illegal" and you have it.

This rule would eliminate the art houses.  Maybe not such a bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this another case of &#8220;if it&#8217;s popular it must be good, and if not, it is bad&#8221;?  Just add that &#8220;it must therefore be illegal&#8221; and you have it.</p>
<p>This rule would eliminate the art houses.  Maybe not such a bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamOndi</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-50066</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamOndi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-50066</guid>
		<description>So, it would seem that I am not the only person who saw the trailer for Rush Hour 3 and immediately let out a heavy sigh, and then said, "Seriously? Ugh."

Why do we get endless sequels of movies that completely blow, but never get another chapter in the Firefly/Serenity universe? Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it would seem that I am not the only person who saw the trailer for Rush Hour 3 and immediately let out a heavy sigh, and then said, &#8220;Seriously? Ugh.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why do we get endless sequels of movies that completely blow, but never get another chapter in the Firefly/Serenity universe? Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slash</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-49914</link>
		<dc:creator>Slash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-49914</guid>
		<description>A rule like this would eliminate 90% of sequels right off the bat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rule like this would eliminate 90% of sequels right off the bat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeeDub</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-49903</link>
		<dc:creator>BeeDub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-49903</guid>
		<description>Did they make this same decision for Rush Hour 1 and 2?  Or has China only just realized that racial humor is this series' bread and butter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they make this same decision for Rush Hour 1 and 2?  Or has China only just realized that racial humor is this series&#8217; bread and butter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
