<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Rush Hour 3&#8242; shows China might be on to something</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/</link>
	<description>Eric D. Snider's blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: whome</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/comment-page-1/#comment-50114</link>
		<dc:creator>whome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 22:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-50114</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this another case of &quot;if it&#039;s popular it must be good, and if not, it is bad&quot;?  Just add that &quot;it must therefore be illegal&quot; and you have it.

This rule would eliminate the art houses.  Maybe not such a bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this another case of &#8220;if it&#8217;s popular it must be good, and if not, it is bad&#8221;?  Just add that &#8220;it must therefore be illegal&#8221; and you have it.</p>
<p>This rule would eliminate the art houses.  Maybe not such a bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamOndi</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/comment-page-1/#comment-50066</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamOndi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-50066</guid>
		<description>So, it would seem that I am not the only person who saw the trailer for Rush Hour 3 and immediately let out a heavy sigh, and then said, &quot;Seriously? Ugh.&quot;

Why do we get endless sequels of movies that completely blow, but never get another chapter in the Firefly/Serenity universe? Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it would seem that I am not the only person who saw the trailer for Rush Hour 3 and immediately let out a heavy sigh, and then said, &#8220;Seriously? Ugh.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why do we get endless sequels of movies that completely blow, but never get another chapter in the Firefly/Serenity universe? Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slash</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/comment-page-1/#comment-49914</link>
		<dc:creator>Slash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-49914</guid>
		<description>A rule like this would eliminate 90% of sequels right off the bat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rule like this would eliminate 90% of sequels right off the bat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeeDub</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/comment-page-1/#comment-49903</link>
		<dc:creator>BeeDub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/02/rush-hour-3-shows-china-might-be-on-to-something/#comment-49903</guid>
		<description>Did they make this same decision for Rush Hour 1 and 2?  Or has China only just realized that racial humor is this series&#039; bread and butter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they make this same decision for Rush Hour 1 and 2?  Or has China only just realized that racial humor is this series&#8217; bread and butter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

