http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/29/wednesday-movie-roundup-balls-of-fury/ Eric D. Snider's blog. Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:14:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/29/wednesday-movie-roundup-balls-of-fury/#comment-57318 OMAllen Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:27:17 +0000 http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/29/wednesday-movie-roundup-balls-of-fury/#comment-57318 Eric, Going to film.com will not be a problem. For your reviews, I'd traverse the internet. Eric,
Going to film.com will not be a problem. For your reviews, I’d traverse the internet.

]]> http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/29/wednesday-movie-roundup-balls-of-fury/#comment-57099 Greg Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:32:45 +0000 http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2007/08/29/wednesday-movie-roundup-balls-of-fury/#comment-57099 So, what's with all the hype about Speed Racer having the background in focus? Didn't Citizen Kane break that ground, like 60 years ago? Sure, it's a different technique, but it's the same effect. Or am I missing something? It was cool when used sparingly, but a whole movie that has the background in focus? With lots of action and motion? Won't that make your eyes wig out? Can I ask more questions? So, what’s with all the hype about Speed Racer having the background in focus? Didn’t Citizen Kane break that ground, like 60 years ago? Sure, it’s a different technique, but it’s the same effect. Or am I missing something? It was cool when used sparingly, but a whole movie that has the background in focus? With lots of action and motion? Won’t that make your eyes wig out? Can I ask more questions?

]]>