<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday movie roundup - May 30</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2008/05/30/friday-movie-roundup-may-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2008/05/30/friday-movie-roundup-may-30/</link>
	<description>Eric D. Snider's blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy Tayler</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2008/05/30/friday-movie-roundup-may-30/#comment-140907</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Tayler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/?p=847#comment-140907</guid>
		<description>If it were attractive women starring in that show/movie, maybe a male or two would be interested in it. As it is, seeing the word SEX followed by those actresses' faces is acting like a Pavlovian behavior reinforcer that makes me now averse to the notion of sex.

Maybe that was the idea all along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were attractive women starring in that show/movie, maybe a male or two would be interested in it. As it is, seeing the word SEX followed by those actresses&#8217; faces is acting like a Pavlovian behavior reinforcer that makes me now averse to the notion of sex.</p>
<p>Maybe that was the idea all along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
