<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday movie roundup &#8211; July 30</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2010/07/30/friday-movie-roundup-july-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2010/07/30/friday-movie-roundup-july-30/</link>
	<description>Eric D. Snider's blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2010/07/30/friday-movie-roundup-july-30/comment-page-1/#comment-237574</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-237574</guid>
		<description>Eric I definitely agree that it is a pretty bland title.  However I don&#039;t really see that as being an issue at all.  First of all, how many people go to a movie solely because of the title?  Not many.  Secondly, the title being so boring could actually work in their favor.  I&#039;m thinking in the context of a group of friends reading the movie listings trying to decide what to go see:  &quot;Our choices are Shrek 7, Transformers 4, The Town,  Tooth Fairy, Dear John. . .&quot;  The Town does kind of stick out because of its simplicity and might lead to someone asking &quot;The Town?  What is that about?&quot;  Yes, granted it could also lead to them just ignoring it as the list of movies flies by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric I definitely agree that it is a pretty bland title.  However I don&#8217;t really see that as being an issue at all.  First of all, how many people go to a movie solely because of the title?  Not many.  Secondly, the title being so boring could actually work in their favor.  I&#8217;m thinking in the context of a group of friends reading the movie listings trying to decide what to go see:  &#8220;Our choices are Shrek 7, Transformers 4, The Town,  Tooth Fairy, Dear John. . .&#8221;  The Town does kind of stick out because of its simplicity and might lead to someone asking &#8220;The Town?  What is that about?&#8221;  Yes, granted it could also lead to them just ignoring it as the list of movies flies by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric D. Snider</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2010/07/30/friday-movie-roundup-july-30/comment-page-1/#comment-237466</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-237466</guid>
		<description>My point about the title -- which I guess I didn&#039;t make very clearly -- is that by itself, without any context, it is a boring and generic title. &quot;The Town.&quot; It tells you nothing. It is not intriguing or memorable. No one will hear &quot;The Town&quot; and think, &quot;Ooh, that sounds like an interesting movie!&quot; They&#039;ll hear &quot;The Town&quot; and think, &quot;Which movie is that again?&quot; The trailer mentions Charlestown, and so one can infer that that&#039;s where &quot;the town&quot; comes from. Maybe the movie addresses the subject in more depth. All I was saying is that the title itself -- as a name, as a marketing tool -- is dull and ineffective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point about the title &#8212; which I guess I didn&#8217;t make very clearly &#8212; is that by itself, without any context, it is a boring and generic title. &#8220;The Town.&#8221; It tells you nothing. It is not intriguing or memorable. No one will hear &#8220;The Town&#8221; and think, &#8220;Ooh, that sounds like an interesting movie!&#8221; They&#8217;ll hear &#8220;The Town&#8221; and think, &#8220;Which movie is that again?&#8221; The trailer mentions Charlestown, and so one can infer that that&#8217;s where &#8220;the town&#8221; comes from. Maybe the movie addresses the subject in more depth. All I was saying is that the title itself &#8212; as a name, as a marketing tool &#8212; is dull and ineffective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2010/07/30/friday-movie-roundup-july-30/comment-page-1/#comment-237453</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-237453</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jettboy: &#8220;Its called “The Town” for a reason. Good to know. Now how was anyone supposed to know that who isn’t from Boston, unless that is the only expected audience?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think they were supposed to, you know, watch the movie.  I suspect this information will be revealed at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric D. Snider</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2010/07/30/friday-movie-roundup-july-30/comment-page-1/#comment-236922</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-236922</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad Russ came back to mention again that people who like &quot;Inception&quot; -- or, apparently, who even *see* it -- are dumb and gullible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad Russ came back to mention again that people who like &#8220;Inception&#8221; &#8212; or, apparently, who even *see* it &#8212; are dumb and gullible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2010/07/30/friday-movie-roundup-july-30/comment-page-1/#comment-236918</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-236918</guid>
		<description>The Town looks terrible. I can&#039;t agree with the premise, it sounds impossible, unlikely, and contrived.

Though I guess the same people that have seen this trailer are watching Inception, so naturally they wouldn&#039;t notice or have the ability to realize how absurd The Town will be.

Yea, 300 bank robberies a year? Everyone lives in the same place? The tough bad guy falls in love with the pretty girl that he kidnapped? A 12 year old could come up something less cliche than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Town looks terrible. I can&#8217;t agree with the premise, it sounds impossible, unlikely, and contrived.</p>
<p>Though I guess the same people that have seen this trailer are watching Inception, so naturally they wouldn&#8217;t notice or have the ability to realize how absurd The Town will be.</p>
<p>Yea, 300 bank robberies a year? Everyone lives in the same place? The tough bad guy falls in love with the pretty girl that he kidnapped? A 12 year old could come up something less cliche than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jettboy</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2010/07/30/friday-movie-roundup-july-30/comment-page-1/#comment-236886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jettboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-236886</guid>
		<description>here is my comment that may or may not have shown up on the &quot;The Town&quot; comments, depending on if I did it right::

Its called &quot;The Town&quot; for a reason. Good to know. Now how was anyone supposed to know that who isn&#039;t from Boston, unless that is the only expected audience? As for the idea that you can&#039;t knock a movie you haven&#039;t seen, again that is a silly argument. The whole idea of a trailer is to bring you in (as it has done for some who have commented), and if they don&#039;t do it correctly then people won&#039;t watch. The fact people are all excited for this means that, well, the movie has been judged by people who haven&#039;t seen it yet. Your a hypocrite unless you watch every movie regardless of your thoughts on the trailer.

Besides, most here are way too critical of the critic. He is known as somewhat of a comedian. Part of his &quot;act&quot; is to find the humor in movies. My guess is he is laughing (as he does) at the deadpan seriousness of the trailer&#039;s defenders. Not that you would know this, but do your homework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here is my comment that may or may not have shown up on the &#8220;The Town&#8221; comments, depending on if I did it right::</p>
<p>Its called &#8220;The Town&#8221; for a reason. Good to know. Now how was anyone supposed to know that who isn&#8217;t from Boston, unless that is the only expected audience? As for the idea that you can&#8217;t knock a movie you haven&#8217;t seen, again that is a silly argument. The whole idea of a trailer is to bring you in (as it has done for some who have commented), and if they don&#8217;t do it correctly then people won&#8217;t watch. The fact people are all excited for this means that, well, the movie has been judged by people who haven&#8217;t seen it yet. Your a hypocrite unless you watch every movie regardless of your thoughts on the trailer.</p>
<p>Besides, most here are way too critical of the critic. He is known as somewhat of a comedian. Part of his &#8220;act&#8221; is to find the humor in movies. My guess is he is laughing (as he does) at the deadpan seriousness of the trailer&#8217;s defenders. Not that you would know this, but do your homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sue-bob</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2010/07/30/friday-movie-roundup-july-30/comment-page-1/#comment-236830</link>
		<dc:creator>sue-bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-236830</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to nominate US Marshals (1998) for Eric&#039;s bad movies. It&#039;s the sort-of-sequel to great action movie The Fugitive (1992) and it has Tommy Lee Jones reprising his Oscar winning role, but it&#039;s depressing (and kind-of pointless).

There are definitely dumber movies out there, but few I wish I could somehow un-watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to nominate US Marshals (1998) for Eric&#8217;s bad movies. It&#8217;s the sort-of-sequel to great action movie The Fugitive (1992) and it has Tommy Lee Jones reprising his Oscar winning role, but it&#8217;s depressing (and kind-of pointless).</p>
<p>There are definitely dumber movies out there, but few I wish I could somehow un-watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/2010/07/30/friday-movie-roundup-july-30/comment-page-1/#comment-236784</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericdsnider.com/blog/?p=5437#comment-236784</guid>
		<description>I never thought I&#039;d disagree with you one one of your Bad Movies, but I do...to an extent, at least. Sure, &quot;Sgt. Pepper&#039;s&quot; is one gigantic clustershmozz of a mess of a film. It&#039;s very weird, and most of the ideas don&#039;t pan out very well. But I never found it boring, or dull. There was enough insanity going on to at least keep you watching, if not totally entertained. And I actualy liked the music, so much so that I tracked down the soundtrack (Steve Martin doing &quot;Maxwell&#039;s Silver Hammer&quot; is probably my all-time favorite Beatles cover). The whole movie&#039;s a train wreck, sure...but it was never a boring train wreck, at least not to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I&#8217;d disagree with you one one of your Bad Movies, but I do&#8230;to an extent, at least. Sure, &#8220;Sgt. Pepper&#8217;s&#8221; is one gigantic clustershmozz of a mess of a film. It&#8217;s very weird, and most of the ideas don&#8217;t pan out very well. But I never found it boring, or dull. There was enough insanity going on to at least keep you watching, if not totally entertained. And I actualy liked the music, so much so that I tracked down the soundtrack (Steve Martin doing &#8220;Maxwell&#8217;s Silver Hammer&#8221; is probably my all-time favorite Beatles cover). The whole movie&#8217;s a train wreck, sure&#8230;but it was never a boring train wreck, at least not to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

