Adam
Movie Review
"Adam"
Review by Eric D. Snider
Grade: B
Rating: PG-13
Released: Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Directed by:
Cast:
If I told you that "Adam" was about a man with Asperger syndrome, a form of high-functioning autism, you would instantly lose all interest in seeing it, right? Yeah, that's what I thought. If Fox Searchlight's marketers are smart, they'll keep a lid on that aspect of the film, because it's actually a humorously bittersweet story buoyed by likable performances, and not an oh-geez-here-comes-another-film-about-a-saintly-disabled-person movie.
The Adam in question, played by Hugh Dancy, is an electronic engineer whose current job has him working on a toy company's new talking doll. Adam's father has just died, leaving him alone in the spacious Manhattan apartment they once shared, with Harlan (Frankie Faison), a family friend, to keep an eye on him.
Adam can mostly take care of himself, though. People with Asperger -- Aspies, as Adam calls them -- take things literally and have trouble knowing what other people are thinking, and they tend to misread facial expressions. Aside from that, they do OK. Adam is happiest when following a routine, and he gets particularly excited by astronomy. He doesn't seem much different from your average nerd.
The new tenant in his building is Beth (Rose Byrne), an elementary school teacher who is immediately fascinated by Adam's quirky personality, not realizing it's an actual mental disorder -- and after all, where is the line between "interesting" and "diagnosable"? Adam and Beth begin a tentative friendship and eventually a romance, though both are aware that such an arrangement will be difficult at best. Beth's father (Peter Gallagher), a corporate accountant who's just been indicted for shady bookkeeping, is adamantly anti-Adam for that reason.
Beyond addressing the elements of Asperger that I've already mentioned, the film doesn't dwell on the particulars. It's a story about two people, one of whom happens to have the condition, and while Asperger plays a part in how they interact, it isn't the focal point. This isn't some cheesy TV movie about a wise "special needs" person who teaches life lessons to those around him. On the contrary, writer/director Max Mayer (whose only other film, "Better Living," was a decade ago) is not afraid to show Adam in a negative light on occasion, or to have Beth lose her patience with him. I don't know if "realistic" is the word I would use to describe the plot -- it is at heart a romantic comedy about cute people behaving cutely -- but it does break free from some of the stereotypes, and the characters are believable.
Central to the film's success is Hugh Dancy's smiling, earnest performance as Adam, a role that easily could have turned one-dimensional and sappy. There is much to admire in Rose Byrne, too, who has chemistry with Dancy and a girl-next-door sexiness of her own. As a pair, Dancy and Byrne are easy to like.
The subplot involving Beth's father feels like a tangent, contributing little to the movie's major themes (though it does give us a chance to enjoy Amy Irving as Beth's mother). It isn't a life-altering movie, nor an overwhelmingly powerful one -- but neither is it trying to be. Rather, it's a simple, light comedy with dramatic underpinnings, and a pleasant way to spend an evening.
Grade: B
Rated PG-13, moderate profanity
1 hr., 35 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.



This item has 4 comments
March 25, 2009 at 10:25 pm
I have Asperger. Should be interesting to see how we Aspies are portrayed. "Mozart and the Whale" did a good job.
July 29, 2009 at 3:49 pm
As someone with Asperger Syndrome, I'm looking forward to this one. A lot of people assume that aspies are largely asexual and not interested in romantic relationships, when really, I (Can't speak for other aspies) am very much interested in bonding romantically. We just have a harder time connecting, so I'm excited to see a film about and Aspie handling the pitfalls and joys of neurotypical dating. It's about time we had a film portray us as anything other than the blank-staring "rain man".
December 28, 2009 at 2:13 am
I finally got a hold of this film and watched it (didn't play in theaters around here - and geez it took forever to get out on DVD!).
I'm wondering if anyone with Asperger could still comment on what they thought of this film.
It almost seemed to me like they came on kind of strong. I can understand not recognizing what people think, but he should be able to drive and talk without stuttering, right?
I'm not sure what to make of the ending. On one hand, the "sheeple" part of me is angry that they didn't tie everything up in typical Hollywood style (I guess I'm more of a romantic than I'd like to think), but on the other hand, it's really impressive that they actually managed to end it in a way that is NOT typical (for the most part).
The movie was kind of hot and cold for me. I suppose it was a success in that regard, since I mostly hated it when Rose Byrne was being a bitch, and liked it when she was understanding. (The exception being a few painfully awkward scenes that I cringed at while watching.)
Overall, I think Eric's rating is very fair, and I agree with it.
December 28, 2009 at 2:21 am
Well about 30 seconds of research on Asperger corrected my previous train of thought. I guess they were more faithful than I thought.
I suppose that, unlike Eric, I *would* have been more interested in the movie if they had focused on letting us know more about the disorder. I didn't realize that there were physical and linguistic problems that went along with the other stuff in reality (it seemed like something the movie put on to make it more sympathetic).
Just saying that I only feel that way because the movie never seemed to address it! Stupid American mainstream's purchasing power and their forced "dumbing down" of complex issues because you'll never make back production costs if you don't. :(