Australia
Movie Review
"Australia"
Review by Eric D. Snider
Grade: B-
Rating: PG-13
Released: Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Directed by:
Cast:
Can it be that "Australia" is only Baz Luhrmann's fourth film? His uniquely Australian style, which mixes broad comedy and campy performances with sweeping romance and beautiful photography, is so clearly defined that it feels like it must have taken more than just "Strictly Ballroom," "Romeo + Juliet," and "Moulin Rouge" to establish it.
But nope, "Australia" is only No. 4 for Baz, and it's easily his most ambitious project to date, a 165-minute epic adventure that's part Western, part war drama, all Aussie. It incorporates the country's notorious treatment of its aboriginal peoples -- until the 1970s, children, especially those of mixed race, were still being taken from their homes by the government -- into a lively, rollicking, overlong, overstuffed movie that tries my patience as much as it entertains me.
It begins in 1939, which for much of Australia apparently looked and felt a lot like the American Old West of 60 years earlier: cowboys, saloons, dusty prairies, and a cattle-based economy. Like many American Westerns, "Australia" concerns a prim aristocrat lady teaming up with a rough-and-tumble cowpoke, whereupon hilarity and opposites-attract romance ensue. Luhrmann has not exactly reinvented the wheel here; he has merely re-spun it (counterclockwise, of course, owing to the Coriolis effect).
The fancy lady is Sarah Ashley (Nicole Kidman), a Brit whose husband owns a ranch called Faraway Downs in northern Australia. Compelled by the family's crumbling finances to sell the place, Sarah heads south (dragging numerous pieces of luggage and hatboxes) and discovers that Faraway Downs has been the object of sabotage and treachery by the Carney Cattle Company, which has a near-monopoly on beef production and has sought to devalue the Ashley property in order to buy it cheap. Lady Sarah will not stand for this!
The task that must be accomplished in order to save Faraway Downs and the Ashley family is to drive 1,500 head of cattle all the way to the city of Darwin, where they can be sold to the army. To help, Sarah enlists a man whose name and occupation are both Drover (Hugh Jackman). He's a freelance mercenary in the old style, beholden to none, reluctant to help anyone other than himself, and so forth. You know the type. He and Sarah are opposed not necessarily by Carney Cattle Company's namesake, King Carney (Bryan Brown), but by his minion, Fletcher (David Wenham), who behaves nefariously and twirls his mustache, at least metaphorically.
The film is rife with stooge-like humor at first as the opposing characters are introduced, then eventually settles in to a more traditional Western sensibility. It remains distinctly Australian, however, with the inclusion of an aborigine boy, Nullah (Brandon Walters), a precocious lad who, like many of his generation, is the offspring of a black woman and a white, adulterous man who now lives it up in the city, his secret progeny safely hidden in the outback. Nullah and his mother have worked at Faraway Downs for who knows how long, and he's eager to help "Mrs. Boss" and Drover fight back against the goliath Carney company.
As a 90-minute old-fashioned Western, "Australia" is just fine. Alas, it goes on for at least another hour. Yes, once the Western portion of the evening's entertainment has concluded, "Australia" launches into its World War II segment, focused on the Japanese Navy's attack on Darwin not long after Pearl Harbor. Thematically, the film needs this chunk to fill out its Nullah-related ideas; from an entertainment standpoint, it really would have been better if it had just been a story about Sarah and Drover movin' cattle across the plains. The rest feels like an afterthought, an extension whose length is unjustified by its content.
Luhrmann has tried to tell too much of a story in one movie, and his enthusiasm far outpaces the audience's. Many of the special effects look plastic, which might be Luhrmann's style -- "Moulin Rouge" looks artificial, too -- but it's more likely the result of budgetary concerns and time constraints. Luhrmann was still tinkering with the film days before its release, further evidence of his overreaching ambition.
"Australia" turns out to be a little messy and a lot too long, and Nicole Kidman doesn't register much personality. Hugh Jackman is a lot more fun to watch, grinnin' and ridin' and horsin' around; so is 12-year-old Brandon Walters, in a very natural, unforced performance as Nullah. In the end, the big ol' goofy flick is more good than bad, a dazzlingly sunny attempt that may tide Baz fans over until project #5 comes along.
Grade: B-
Rated PG-13, a little mild sexuality, mild profanity, one F-word, some war-related violence
2 hrs., 45 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.



This item has 7 comments
December 5, 2008 at 9:01 am
While this may be only his 4th film, Baz Lurhmann has done a lot of theatre.
December 5, 2008 at 10:22 am
Your B- minus rating, coupled with the fact that I spent four months of my mission in Darwin and its surrounds (in fact, part of that time was serving with your cousin Nathan), has helped me make the decision to see the film. Thanks, it's a load off my mind.
Although I don't always agree with your reviews, I trust your movie reviewing judgment enough to breathe a sigh of relief that this was not a total bomb.
December 5, 2008 at 3:29 pm
That's "corriolis effect", not "corriolus".
December 5, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Oops. Drop an r. "Coriolis".
December 12, 2008 at 7:43 pm
Boy did I want to love this movie, and boy did I hate it! The characters(outside of Jackman)were paper thin and each scene looks like they took 2.5 days to get it lit perfectly, but that detracted from it, making it appear almost digital.I wasn't looking for flubs either, but one stands out- the kiss in the rain near the end.Hugh's shirt had these weird brown spots(probably make-up)on his shirt.Just as I noticed it, boom a starched clean shirt appears!Come on, who worked continuity?Who did the lighting? Who cast these bad actors?How much did they spend to make this?Someone ought to be ashamed.Never mind the soundtrack either.No grammy coming this way...
December 28, 2008 at 11:38 am
Who cares what all the reviewers and critics say? The bottomline is, Is the film entertaining? Any my answer is a resounding YES. It's worth every sen of my 10 ringgit ticket.
March 6, 2009 at 2:29 pm
I love Baz films---yes---all of the other three! But I found that I was a bit disconcerted with this one when it started---it felt a bit cheesy and sure, the backgrounds were more like something that would be in an old film noir picture.
But then, I happen to think that Baz did this on purpose. This was the look that he was going for and he definitely achieved it. After I accepted that, I settled in and enjoyed the movie----cheesiness and all. I happen to like the lead actors---two of my favs----so I can say nothing bad about them----they did the best with what they were given. Bad acting?---puh-lease---then you don't watch enough movies!
I would recommend this DVD to all, and will probably purchase it at some time. I own all the other Baz films----I still think that he is an amazing director....