As one of the worst directors currently working, German half-wit Uwe Boll is under a lot of pressure. Sure, "House of the Dead" was a harmlessly stupid zombiefest, and yeah, "Alone in the Dark" was an even stupider, less harmless rehash of creature/sci-fi cliches. But can "BloodRayne," his latest, continue to lower the bar? Can he continue to make each movie worse than the last one, or will he eventually bottom out?
I am pleased to announce that "BloodRayne" (which, like the other two, was based on a video game) is, in fact, worse than "Alone in the Dark." It's dumb, incoherent, and demonstrates Boll's remarkable knack for getting even good actors to give bad performances.
The Internet Movie Database says the film is set in the 1700s in Romania, but neither of those details is apparent in the film. It could be medieval times, but it could also be a timeless "Lord of the Rings" kind of fantasy land. And Romania? Well, OK. Not sure why the accents range from American to British, then, including a hilarious one from noted non-Brit Michelle Rodriguez, but whatever you say, movie.
Anyway, wherever it is, and whenever it is, it's about a carnival freak named Rayne (Kristann Loken) who is half-vampire, half-human, or "dhampir," as such people are known. Her father, Kagan (Ben Kingsley), has long, girly hair and looks like Dame Maggie Smith and is also the most powerful vampire in all the land. I guess he'd have to be, to get away with having long, girly hair and looking like Dame Maggie Smith. Since Rayne was the product of rape, and since Kagan eventually killed Rayne's mother, she is not keen on the old man and wants to destroy him. In fact, she wants all vampires dead, despite being half of one herself.
Also in the vampire-destroying business is a society, or maybe it's more like a club, called Brimstone. A trio of their representatives -- rugged Vladimir (Michael Madsen), pretty-boy Sebastian (Matt Davis) and not-English Katarin (Michelle Rodriguez) -- meets up with Rayne, and after some initial skepticism on both sides, the four join forces to take down Kagan, and also to allow Rayne and Sebastian to have a comically inept sex scene.
Kagan is looking for three artifacts left over from some old vampire from centuries ago, and if he gets them, he'll be super-magical-powerful or something. So Rayne and her posse are trying to find the artifacts first, even as Kagan's armies are pursuing them, and so forth.
Much of the film's unintentional humor comes from the fact that every lame line in Guinevere Turner's screenplay is spoken with either complete apathy (as with Michael Madsen) or over-the-top melodrama (e.g., Ben Kingsley). Only Billy Zane, as Katarin's father, tries to breathe life into his dialogue -- and he's only in the film for a couple scenes and serves no purpose anyway.
It goes without saying that the movie is neither exciting nor suspenseful (nor even interesting), but I think the chief flaw is that we feel nothing for any of the characters. They're one-dimensional movie buffoons, not people, and their problems and crises -- so confusingly conveyed by the ramshackle film -- bounce off a viewer's mind like ping pong balls. It never occurs to you to think of the film as anything other than a silly swords-and-castles tale, and a particularly ineffective one at that.
Grade: F
Rated R, abundant bloody violence, some very strong sexuality, a lot of nudity
1 hr., 36 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.
This item has 4 comments
August 11, 2007 at 5:11 pm
"As one of the worst directors currently working, German half-wit Uwe Boll is under a lot of pressure. Sure, "House of the Dead" was a harmlessly stupid zombiefest, and yeah, "Alone in the Dark" was an even stupider, less harmless rehash of creature/sci-fi cliches. But can "BloodRayne," his latest, continue to lower the bar? Can he continue to make each movie worse than the last one, or will he eventually bottom out?
I am pleased to announce that "BloodRayne" (which, like the other two, was based on a video game) is, in fact, worse than "Alone in the Dark."
Eric, you slay me; couldn't get past the first paragraph. lol
March 24, 2008 at 2:33 pm
This movie is the one that finally convinced me that Uwe Boll knows absolutely nothing about his source material. See, the Bloodrayne games were 100% honest about themselves (i.e. hot, bitchy, vampire chick messily slaughtering bad guys mostly because they're in the way). No pretense, no full-of-itself seriousness (even in the second game, when vampires pretty much take over the world and kill everybody), just stabbing and shooting snarly things and Nazis. And, really, when does that get old?
May 18, 2008 at 6:50 pm
Why the hell do they keep making movies based on video games? They're always bad, never really resemble the video game, and always bomb at the box office. I can't imagine that dvd sales would even recoup the cost of this movie. I would put this movie on par with Manos: The Hands of Fate in pure cinematic torment. I caught this piece of crap on cable and couldn't sit through 10 minutes of it. Anyone I know that has seen it has remarked how bad it was with words like unwatchable, ludicrous, and my favorite, craptacular. I wonder how much of the movies' budget went into the producers' pockets because it looked extremely low-budget.
June 1, 2008 at 2:30 pm
Yes, it was bad, I only saw about 1/2 to 3/4ths of it on cable one time, but damn was Kristann Loken pretty hot in this.
Disclaimer: I have never played the game, I didn't even recognize this was the movie I'd seen most of once until half way through the review, yes I play a lot of video games overall. And yes, I laughed with this review. I love your F's!
Very inane movie, but nicely hot leading actress, for a movie based on a video game. ;)