There's nothing in "Death at a Funeral" that's any funnier than the tagline that appeared in some of the advertising: "A family that puts the F U in funeral." That's gold!
The movie, a madcap British farce from director Frank Oz ("Dirty Rotten Scoundrels," "In & Out," the voice of Miss Piggy), offers a few solid laughs and is generally fun, but it's nothing great. I kept thinking it was taking its time to set up characters and scenarios that would later pay off in a frenzy of hilarity, only to realize the frenzy wasn't coming. It's more a mild torrent of hilarity. Scattered hilarity with a chance of guffaws.
The action occurs all in one afternoon at a picturesque English country home where a funeral is to be held for the family patriarch, Edward. His oldest son, Daniel (Matthew MacFadyen), is in charge of the arrangements, while the other son, Robert (Rupert Graves), a successful novelist now living in New York, is waltzing in at the last minute to make an appearance. Daniel, a natural-born worrier, wants to be a novelist, too, and is highly conscious of the fact that everyone's expecting his brother the wordsmith to give the eulogy, not him.
The family and friends arrive, all bringing baggage of their own. Cousin Martha (Daisy Donovan) is secretly engaged to Simon (Alan Tudyk), but is fearful her father, the stern doctor Victor (Peter Egan), won't approve; Simon's accidental ingestion of a hallucinogenic drug disrupts the funeral and makes Victor's disapproval all but certain. It's Martha's brother Troy (Kris Marshall) who's responsible: He is "studying to be a pharmacist," which in his case means concocting and selling drugs.
Then there are the friends, Howard (Andy Nyman) and Justin (Ewen Bremner). Justin has the hots for Martha; Howard is a hypochondriac and a worrier who gets stuck tending to vicious old wheelchair-bound Uncle Alfie (Peter Vaughan).
Also present is a man no one knows (Peter Dinklage), calling himself Peter and claiming to be an old friend of the deceased. I bet you can figure out what kind of "friend" he was if you think real hard, or if you watch the movie's trailer.
Dean Craig's script produces a lot of characters but doesn't give them all enough to do. The Justin/Martha thing doesn't go anywhere, for example. Edward's bereaved widow, Sandra (Jane Asher), makes a few comments suggesting she doesn't get along with her daughter-in-law, Jane (Keeley Hawes), but that's rather pointless, too, although I do like her response when Jane offers her a cup of tea: "Tea can do many things, Jane. But it can't bring back the dead."
There is a professional, shiny polish on the movie, with everything running smoothly and coming off as an unforced lark. Whether the players all have anything interesting to do or not, at least Oz can jump from one subplot to another without losing steam, and the story's confinement to one setting -- the house -- never feels claustrophobic.
The movie is not always laugh-out-loud funny, but at least it never becomes tiresome or aggravating -- and that's more than a lot of comedies can say. I do question the wisdom of going to the toilet for jokes, as "Death at a Funeral" does in one memorable scene. But then again, death and poop are the only things we all have in common, so why not make jokes about them?
Grade: B-
Rated R, a lot of harsh profanity, a guy's naked butt, brief mild violence, brief gross-out humor
1 hr., 30 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.
This item has 1 comment
August 24, 2007 at 7:37 am
I love the kind of slapstick evident in "Death at a Funeral" (less so the kind one gets in Mr. Bean), but I think that the long-suffering, world-weary "stiff upper lip" of Matthew Macfayden's Daniel was also great fun in its own way.
I have made up a personal "quote-whore" tag for this film which is: "The funniest British film about a funeral since 'The Wrong Box.'" Very pleased with myself, I decided to see if the "Recommendations" one gets on imdb.com agreed with me. As usual, they were bizarre. (If you liked "Hairspray," why not try "Shampoo"?)
If you enjoyed The Wrong Box (http://imdb.com/title/tt0061204/), the imdb.com database also recommends:
Lock, Stock & Two Smoking Barrels (http://imdb.com/title/tt0120735/)
Four Rooms (http://imdb.com/title/tt0113101/)
O Lucky Man! (http://imdb.com/title/tt0070464/)
Twin Town (http://imdb.com/title/tt0120394/)
Around the World in 80 Days (1956) (http://imdb.com/title/tt0048960/)
To be honest, I can't make much of a connection between "The Wrong Box" and any of these other films. (Although, "The Wrong Box" was based on a novel by Robert Louis Stevenson & "Around the Word in 80 Days" is based on a Jules Verne novel--maybe the whole 19th C. novelist thing connects them?)
So let's look at the recommendations for people who liked "Death at a Funeral" (http://imdb.com/title/tt0795368/):
The Upside of Anger (http://imdb.com/title/tt0365885/)
Eulogy (http://imdb.com/title/tt0349416/)
The Human Stain (http://imdb.com/title/tt0308383/)
Heaven (http://imdb.com/title/tt0246677/)
The Constant Gardner (http://imdb.com/title/tt0387131/)
These choices are, if anything, even more baffling ("The Constant Gardner" ??).
Does anybody know exactly how imdb.com (or amazon.com or any of a number of equally horrible examples) comes up with these so-called "recommendations". I rarely ever see one where I think, "Oh, of course!" My response is usually more like "WTF ??"