Death Race
Movie Review
"Death Race"
Review by Eric D. Snider
Grade: D+
Rating: R
Released: Friday, August 22, 2008
Directed by:
Cast:
A movie like "Death Race," in which hardened prisoners drive tricked-out cars and attempt to cross the finish line without being killed by the other racers, has exactly one shot at being enjoyable: It must present the race in a thrilling, dynamic fashion, coaxing viewers into an attitude of "let's relax and watch these idiots murder each other."
The fact that "Death Race" can't even manage this one simple task is a testament to the incompetence of its writer and director, Paul W.S. Anderson ("Event Horizon," "Resident Evil"), who has never made a good movie and apparently isn't about to start now. The race itself doesn't start until 37 minutes into the movie -- and what could Anderson possibly think viewers would care about in those first 37 minutes? The backstories of the characters? Their hopes and dreams and motivations? No sir -- or, anyway, not the way that material is presented here, i.e., generically. This is a C-movie with delusions of B-movie grandeur.
A loose remake of the 1975 cult favorite "Death Race 2000," Anderson's film stars Jason Statham as Jensen Ames, a former racer who is elaborately framed for murder and sent to Terminal Island maximum-security prison. It's the year 2012, the economy is ruined, and prisons are run for profit by corporations. This particular prison, managed with ruthless precision by a severe woman named Hennessey (Joan Allen), has made a fortune televising Death Race, in which the inmates are given access to cars that they load with weapons and defenses and use to demolish one another in a three-stage race. If a driver wins the race five times without being killed, he's set free (theoretically, anyway; no one has done it yet).
Hennessey is quick to recruit Ames as a driver, making you wonder if, gee, maybe she had a hand in getting him here in the first place. (The audience picks up on this a lot faster than Ames does.) Each driver gets a crew to help him construct his vehicle, and Ames' is led by Coach (Ian McShane), a wise, philosophical guru who, like all inmates in movies about prisons, has astonishing access to a wide variety of things that you wouldn't think a guy in prison would be able to get his hands on so readily. Among them: a TV, VCR, footage of yesterday's race, a fancy gift box, and various detonators.
On race day, the drivers meet their navigators, who are invariably hot chicks bused in from the women's facility up the road. This is done for the benefit of Death Race's TV audience, which likes to look at hot chicks. It is also done for the benefit of "Death Race's" movie audience, which also likes to look at hot chicks. Ames' hot chick is named Case (Natalie Martinez). She's in prison because she killed a cop. Just FYI.
There are nine contestants in the Death Race, but only two of them matter to the movie. One is Pachenko (Max Ryan), a Russian dude with a prior connection to Ames. The other is Machine Gun Joe (Tyrese Gibson), who had a personal rivalry with the racer Ames replaced. Ames inherited that driver's public persona -- "Frankenstein," a masked, anonymous anti-hero -- and the rivalry with it.
The film takes way too long to tell us all this, then fails to redeem itself when the racing begins. The race is shot and edited in the chaotic, spastic style so fashionable these days, and when you can tell what's going on, what's going on isn't very creative: cars running into each other, cars spinning out of control, cars firing machine guns at one another, drivers gritting their teeth and saying tough-guy things, etc. All of this is intercut with shots of Joan Allen looking smug and imperious as she barks orders to underlings and oversees her dominion. No matter where someone is, Joan Allen always manages to be standing above them, observing. I bet Anderson spent three days doing nothing but having Joan Allen stand in various locations and getting shots of her looking coldly satisfied.
Anderson also gave Allen what may be the year's most bizarre bit of dialogue. Angry at Ames' attempts to fight against her, Hennessey says, "F*** with me and we'll see who s***s on the sidewalk!" I have no idea what that means, but I like it. The movie needs more of that -- more outrageously bad lines, more bloody deaths, more ingenious methods of dispatching enemies. Anderson offers nothing but crashes and explosions, apparently thinking we've never seen crashes and explosions before. He is wrong.
Grade: D+
Rated R, a lot of harsh profanity, plenty of car-crash violence and several brief gory moments
1 hr., 45 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.


This item has 8 comments
August 25, 2008 at 4:56 pm
How awesome a movie is this?! A man is falsley accused of a crime. He is then placed in prison for which he has to compete in a brutal reality TV gameshow in which the last survivor is given his freedom. Yes The Condemned is a wonderful movie.... oh I'm sorry I was thinking of something else.
August 25, 2008 at 8:21 pm
Funny, I was thinking of The Running Man.
August 25, 2008 at 11:43 pm
Funny, I was thinking of the time I watched The Shawshank Redemption and Quiz Show back-to-back at 4 a.m. while on an ice cream bender (cue Family Guy-style flashback).
August 28, 2008 at 2:22 am
I was thinking Running Man as well...
Anyhow, several years ago I blindly picked up the A vs. P dvd and took it home. I was excited about watching the collision of these two great franchises- their "in vitro" love child. But what a stinking pile of disappointment I was in for! I didn't even finish it it was so committed to going nowhere. I only get burned that bad by a director that bad once. That is, you don't have "some talent" that you just failed to tap for a year of planning and 6 months of shooting (or whatever those time frames are.) There was no talent of any kind evident and you only go totally bust like that if you have no real thought behind your creation. If there had been something redeeming maybe I'd take a chance and maybe get burned again but I knew this movie was going to be worthless as soon as I saw who directed it. Sorry, but good FX don't cut it any longer. If you have the money and hire the right people, you've got good FX. No questions asked. There has to be an intriguing idea. (Not to mention the best part was removed in the translation from the original to this bowel movement. That decision alone starts the whole project in "FAIL!" mode.)
O.K., I'm through ranting and now I got revenge for the $3.50 I wasted on that DVD rental four years ago. Take that, Anderson, you ball dropping dolt.
September 2, 2008 at 8:17 pm
Is it fair to say that Jason Statham has never made a good movie and apparently isn't about to start now?
p.s. Please see the original Death Race, it had it's slow moments but they got points for killing people! It doesn't get much better then that.
September 3, 2008 at 2:36 pm
Jason Statham was in Snatch. I enjoyed that movie a lot and I think he was pretty good in it.
September 3, 2008 at 3:10 pm
Jason was also in The Bank Job. That was a decent movie.
September 7, 2008 at 5:51 am
Not to mention Statham in "The Transporter". Silly plot, but some of the most magnificent car chase and martial arts sequences I've ever seen.
Anyhow, #4 there speaking of Aliens vs Predator, they shared the same boring initial act. It's common knowledge how Spielburg refused to show the shark in Jaws early, to build up suspense and get to know the characters better. Paul Anderson took this to heart and now always has an insanely boring first half-hour in his films. He apparently doesn't realize you also have to have a great script and competent actors for this to work.