Julie & Julia
Movie Review
"Julie & Julia"
Review by Eric D. Snider
Grade: B+
Rating: PG-13
Released: Friday, August 7, 2009
Directed by:
Cast:
Meryl Streep and Amy Adams, already highly regarded by their peers and audiences alike, don't need a success like "Julie & Julia" to bolster their reputations. But Nora Ephron, the film's writer and director, does. It is she who has been on a losing streak for the last decade, the luster of hits like "You've Got Mail" and "Sleepless in Seattle" having faded, replaced by more recent debacles like 2005's "Bewitched" and 2000's execrable "Hanging Up." Ephron emerges as the victor in the breezy and thoroughly delightful comedy that is "Julie & Julia."
The film is of unusual provenance. It's the first movie I'm aware of to be based on a blog, albeit one that was later turned into a book, "Julie & Julia," about a woman's efforts to cook everything in Julia Child's first cookbook. It's also half-based on another book, Child's memoir "My Life in France." The result is a film that tells two separate but parallel stories, featuring women who live 3,000 miles and 40 years apart. The connective thread: food.
Julie Powell (Adams) is a frustrated writer in Queens, N.Y., in 2002, working as a low-level drone in a government office. Her escape is her love of cooking, which her husband, Eric (Chris Messina), is only too happy to encourage. At his suggestion, she starts a blog describing her page-by-page tackling of "Mastering the Art of French Cooking," with the goal of cooking all 524 recipes in 365 days. As she does it, she imagines her idol, the indomitable Julia Child, watching over her like a patron saint with a warbly voice.
Intercut with this story is the story of Child herself, played by Streep, living in Paris in the early 1950s with her husband, Paul (Stanley Tucci), who works for the U.S. State Department. Julia doesn't speak French and, despite her love of eating, has no natural inclination toward cooking. But she sets out to learn (to speak French and to cook), unfailingly supported by her adoring Paul.
There is not much more plot than that. It was around the one-hour mark that I noticed the film hadn't introduced any major conflicts. Not that it matters -- watching Adams stumble endearingly through Child's recipes while Streep waltzes through the Cordon Bleu cooking school is entertainment enough. When the conflicts do finally arrive, they are dealt with handily, as if Ephron didn't want to dampen the good time we were having.
This is reflected in the two marriages on display. Neither woman cooks alone, after all, and it's the husbands who get to help with the eating. Paul and Julia Child, if the film is to be believed, never had so much as a minor tiff. Whether that's true or not, watching them interact as an adoring couple without a single unkind word to say to each other is a pleasure -- aided, of course, by Streep and Tucci's fine performances. (As always, Streep embodies her character with complete mastery. And since Child was 6'2", Ephron avoids shooting Streep's feet, lest we see the platform shoes she's wearing.)
Julie and Eric are an enviable couple, too, playful and honest and in love. Their obligatory fight over her obsession with the project and her neglect of him mercifully lasts only two scenes. It's the sort of thing that you know technically needs to be in the story, but why dwell on it? Get back to the cooking!
I don't think the film has any great truths to share about food, marriage, or anything else, nor do I think it means to. It's nothing more than two light tales about two plucky women, structured as a series of scenes in which we get to watch them enjoy themselves. When Julia's sister Dorothy (Jane Lynch), who's as tall and loud as she is, comes to visit in Paris, I'm thinking: I would watch a weekly TV series about the misadventures of Julia and Dorothy as played by Meryl Streep and Jane Lynch, with Stanley Tucci tiptoeing around as Julia's bemused husband. When Julie is discovering the joys of being a blogger who has devoted readers and fans, I'm thinking: What a rewarding thing for her to experience! I'm happy for her. I'm happy for Mrs. Child. And I'm happy for Nora Ephron, too.
Grade: B+
Rated PG-13, a little mild profanity, brief sexual vulgarity, one F-word
2 hrs., 3 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.



This item has 7 comments
August 7, 2009 at 10:48 pm
Consumer warning: This movie contains less than 50% of Julia Child. The rest is mostly corn syrup and plywood. The problem is not with the acting (Streep and Tucci are both A++) but with the source material - unfortunatelly the Julie Powell character is closely modeled after real Julie Powell - an atrocious writer with chip on her shoulder, a self-absorbed unhappy shallow chick who happens to be also devoid of sense of humor and perspective. In every way she is the opposite of Julia Child.
I would have been commendable of the (otherwise sensible) boyfriend to dump her from the rooftop - to add a much needed sense of closure to this uneven movie that runs good thirty minutes overlong - but no such luck. Spoiler alert: Julie Powell, like, becomes totally a celebrity blogger and she even ends up writing a whole book about it and they even make a movie about it - imagine that!
August 8, 2009 at 2:06 pm
Thank you, milkshaken. I wanted to read your review of the movie, but wasn't sure where to find it. Luckily, you posted on Eric's website.
August 8, 2009 at 7:37 pm
This was a perfect evening at the movies. It doesn't have to be real or even true. It's heartwarming and comfortable. Never once did I squirm in my seat. Never once did my heart race. I was constantly relaxed, entertained, involved and envious. That's what the movies are for! These (almost) perfect characters are what our dreams are made of. If Streep and Adams don't at least get nominated for best actress and best supporting actress--you pick the order--there must be something truly spectacular coming in the fall.
By the way, in one of the later scenes in Julia Child's kitchen Meryl Streep is clearly depicted wearing dramatic heels, somewhere between 4 & 6 inches, but I'm no expert.
August 11, 2009 at 6:36 pm
I might actually see this movie after reading Eric's review. I wasn't impressed with the book at all - the book was overflowing with unnecessary and harsh obscenities that really detracted from the over-all story. I only got about halfway through the book before I skipped to the last 20 pages and then called it quits.
August 15, 2009 at 10:28 pm
I was left wanting for more Child's after I saw this as well. Also, I got the distinct impression that the Blogger one wasn't portrayed at all like she must be in real life. I mean, at one point her good friend cordially calls her a bitch, and as anyone can see, the version of her in the movie is clearly just the opposite. Similarly, she says that she can be very vulgar in her blog, yet the character is never vulgar. So in the end, it seems kind of odd that in the end Julie and Julia are said to not be that much alike, because the movie versions of them are probably a lot more alike than the real versions.
August 18, 2009 at 4:21 pm
This is the movie you want to go see after a bad work day. It was worth two viewings-I took my 93 yr old neighbor lady & then my husband. They were both delighted by it. I want my own copy when it's released on DVD. Masterful Meryl once again-you see her but she's Julia as I remember Julia. I don't think I'll bother with the JP book if it indeed has such foul language. Thank Goodness, the screenwriter was wise enough to leave it out. Amazing how one misplaced sex scene or foul language can ruin an otherwise commendable film. Spend the money-go see this movie.
August 23, 2009 at 5:44 pm
I enjoyed the movie, but I too am in the camp of wanting more Julia Child! I thought Meryl Streep inhabited her brilliantly, as she always does with her characters, & would've loved it if the whole movie had been about her, without the Julie distraction.