Max Payne
Movie Review
"Max Payne"
Review by Eric D. Snider
Grade: C-
Rating: PG-13
Released: Friday, October 17, 2008
Directed by:
Cast:
For a movie based on a video game, there's a curious dearth of action in "Max Payne." I know we've often complained that these movies were ALL action and NO substance, but this one has gone in the opposite direction. Well, except there's not really any substance, either. So it went in the opposite direction, but only part of the way. It stopped in the middle and is now a one-dimensional detective noir rather than an exciting shoot-em-up.
By the way, I have never played the Max Payne video game. Does this disqualify me from reviewing the movie? Then stop reading now! Cuz I'm totally about to review the hell out of it anyway.
Mark Wahlberg takes a break from his talking-to-animals duties to play the title character, a New York City police detective whose wife and baby were murdered three years ago by three assailants, one of whom escaped and was never identified. (The other two are dead and thus unhelpful.) Max now works in the cold case bureau of the department, basically pushing papers around all day so he can focus his efforts on his real objective: finding the guy who killed his family.
Following a lead, he winds up in the company of a sultry Russian named, like all sultry Russians, Natasha (Olga Kurylenko), whose sister, Mona (Mila Kunis), is a villain of some kind. (Assassin? Gangster? At one point Mona reminds Max, "You know what I do for a living," and I thought, "Well, that makes one of us.") Natasha winds up dead with Max's wallet nearby, making him a suspect. The subsequent death of a police officer in Max's apartment makes things look even worse. At this point, rather than cooperating with the Internal Affairs detective (played by Chris "Ludacris" Bridges) and explaining everything he knows, Max becomes surly and combative, acting exactly like a guilty person would even though he genuinely has nothing to hide.
Connected to all this is a new street drug called Valkyr, a serum that comes in little vials, and when you drink it you get terrifying hallucinations that frequently lead to your death. (Yeah, I don't understand the appeal either.) The drug is affiliated somehow with Aesir Pharmaceuticals, a massive company that Max's late wife worked for, where the head of security, BB Hensley (Beau Bridges), is an ex-cop and a friend of Max's.
The conspiracies and secrets run even wider than I have suggested, and perhaps you are wondering where, in all this, is there a place for Max to run around shooting people? And that is a good question! Director John Moore ("Behind Enemy Lines," the "Omen" remake) stages it like a classic film noir, particularly in the visuals: lots of shadows, slits of light coming through window shades, smoke and steam everywhere -- cinematographer Jonathan Sela has photographed everything quite gorgeously. Occasional bursts of red remind us that there was recently a movie called "Sin City," too. Max, a hard-boiled detective falsely accused of murder who has to find the real doer to clear his own name, is an archetype. There are femmes fatales. You get the idea.
All of this would be a lot more useful if the story surrounding it were better, and if it made more sense. A Valkyr-addicted maniac named Lupino (Amaury Nolasco) is allegedly relevant to the matters at hand, but why, exactly, is he doing what he's doing? What DOES Mona do for a living -- and, for that matter, why is she even in the film? The movie over-explains some things ("The one you're looking for is Lupino!" someone says, whereupon the movie gives us three brief flashbacks of Lupino, in case we forgot who that was), then leaves a lot of other things piled up like a train wreck.
In the last 10 minutes, after numerous lurching plot twists and unsatisfactory explanations, you finally get the gunfights and vengeance you came for, including some of that super-slow-motion stuff that I understand is quite popular in the video games that the kids play on their iPhones or their Googles or wherever. But until then, it's merely a lukewarm police procedural, with very little of the adventure that the video game presumably provides.
Grade: C-
Rated PG-13, some profanity, a fair amount of moderate violence, mild sexuality
1 hr., 35 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.



This item has 10 comments
October 17, 2008 at 5:08 pm
that was a terrible review. if it wasn't on google i wouldn't have wasted my time. but this was very ininformative.
the movie was actually really good for those of you who see this
October 17, 2008 at 7:51 pm
You have to play the game, and considering you haven't; your opinion is invalid.
Awesome game awesome movie.
October 17, 2008 at 8:10 pm
To balance out the above silliness: a lukewarm review has exactly zero influence on your enjoyment of a movie (or whatever), provided you're actually capable of forming your own opinions (Harry Knowles fans need not apply).
Or, shorter: I love the games and I'll see the movie regardless, and probably like it more than Eric since I already know who the characters are and what they do.
October 18, 2008 at 3:48 am
You guys are so predictable. Every single review of a movie based on a video game gets the same response. When will you learn that Eric reviews movies and not video games?
October 18, 2008 at 3:23 pm
Alright. I played not only the games, but flat out loved them. I went into the movie not expecting much, because with past game to movie adaptations...Well, the results hadn't been very good. Maybe if you had never played the game, yes, you could enjoy some of the past mistakes, but even then not playing Max Payne wouldn't help you in enduring the movie.
I was saddened by how shallow, predictable, and poorly done the movie was. It's representing a game classic that deserves better. The movie's characters felt flat, and the storyline had horrible pacing. The game doesn't transfer well to the big screen, or maybe it's just the director and actors chosen.
Regardless I was not a fan of this movie. Yes I played the game, but tried to look at the movie as separate from it. Even then the movie wasn't that great. Just as a movie, simple and plain - Max Payne was not remarkable or really memorable.
I'll just pop my game back in the cd drive next time I want to experience a game for how it's meant to be.
October 18, 2008 at 4:27 pm
If it's video game reviews you want and you don't mind some rated R content, Yahtzee's Zero Punctuation reviews are fantastic. I won't link to it due to the aforementioned rated R content, Google it. He hasn't done Max Payne but he has done games from quite a few other franchises that were turned into films: Silent Hill, Tomb Raider, Alone in the Dark and some others.
My husband wants to see Max Payne, but meh... I don't think I'm gonna let him drag me to it.
October 18, 2008 at 5:08 pm
I've never played the game, but I was really looking forward to the movie. It's the kind of movie I would usually love, but I have to agree with Eric. It had some great visuals, but otherwise it was slow and poorly written.
October 18, 2008 at 9:48 pm
I loved the game and liked the movie but i have to agree that some of the parts felt flat and some parts were a bit to slow especially in some conevrsation, the pre-ending, the part were max payne became a crazed shooter, wasnt as exciting as i thought i should have been, and im not saying beacuse of the game im saying it more beacuse of the character mainly. In the end they fitted the characters, as in the description of the character but felt them a bit short and flat playing as them.
Oh, and some key parts of the video game werent entirely there, though i think they tried to separate that but i dont think it worked for them in this movie...
October 21, 2008 at 8:20 pm
You listed Chris "Ludacris" Bridges in this review, but in others you just put Ludacris. So now when I click on his name I won't see all of his movies. This is not tolerable. Correct it, please.
January 15, 2009 at 9:24 pm
I'm shocked that this review got higher than an F...I thought it was one of the top five worst movies I have ever seen in my life! Bad acting, bad directing (visuals could have been cool if it was consistent), horrendous plot, cheesy...it was just plain awful.