The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Movie Review
"The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"
Review by Eric D. Snider
Grade: B+
Rating: PG-13
Released: Thursday, December 25, 2008
Directed by:
Cast:
The subject of death has been addressed so often in art and entertainment that it's hard to find anything new to say about it. "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button," which is all about Life and Death, doesn't come up with any new insights, perhaps, but it does put a new twist on the cradle-to-grave journey that we all take. It also tells a grand, eloquent tale full of romance and melancholy, the kind of old-fashioned love story that would have been produced during Hollywood's Golden Age if they'd had the right technology for it.
The title character is born, in New Orleans, just as the horrifically deadly First World War is ending, and there is something peculiar about him: He is a normal size for a baby, but he has all the health symptoms of an 80-year-old man. Abandoned by his father, his mother dead in childbirth, Benjamin is taken in by a barren black woman named Queenie (Taraji P. Henson) who cares for the elderly residents at an old folks' home -- a good environment, you'd think, in which to raise a little boy who looks like a little old man.
As Benjamin gets older, he starts to look and feel younger. He has all the natural curiosity and immaturity of a youth, stuck in a body that borders on decrepit. Through it all, he is played by Brad Pitt, his makeup-aged face seamlessly attached digitally to bodies of the appropriate smallness. The effect is mesmerizing, almost distracting: How did they DO that? And how did they do it so well? Special effects are now so common in movies that we hardly notice them anymore, but these stand out as exceptional.
But back to the story. When he's about 15 (and looking 65), Benjamin meets Daisy, the granddaughter of one of the old folks he and Queenie live with. She realizes it's only his body that's old, that his mind and soul are her own age, and they become partners in mischief. Later, when she is grown up and played by Cate Blanchett, there will be love between them.
In the meantime, Benjamin's life -- already like that of a Dickens character for being an orphan who narrates his own story -- becomes even more Dickensian as he sets out to see the world. He joins a tugboat crew run by the affably drunk Capt. Mike (Jared Harris), goes to Russia, attracts the admiration of a British envoy's wife (Tilda Swinton), then becomes part of the U.S. war effort after Pearl Harbor is bombed and Capt. Mike's ship is enlisted by the Navy. Daisy, meanwhile, becomes a dancer in New York and gets caught up in the worldliness of the post-war era, reading D.H. Lawrence and hanging out with beatniks.
The director is David Fincher, whose previous films -- "Seven" and "Fight Club," to name the two most famous -- have not exactly been tenderhearted ruminations on love and mortality. (On the other hand, they've always featured plenty of death.) "Benjamin Button," inspired by an F. Scott Fitzgerald short story with a screenplay by Eric Roth ("Forrest Gump," "Munich"), combines Fincher's well-known fondness for technology -- this film wouldn't have been possible even 10 years ago -- with a previously unseen compassion and wistfulness. What could have been a freak show about a man who ages backwards is instead a beautifully sad and often very moving story.
It's a long film, though, and it's hard not to wonder, once something exceeds the 150-minute mark, whether the length is justified. Benjamin's early life receives more attention than it needed, maybe; it's not until he and Daisy are both adults, meeting in the middle of their opposite lifespan trajectories, that the story really comes to life. The film is punctuated by scenes of an elderly Daisy, in the hospital just as Hurricane Katrina hits New Orleans, having Benjamin's diary read to her by her daughter (Julia Ormond) -- which suggests all the more that the parts of the film that are Daisy-free are tangential to the real story.
Pitt and Blanchett are excellent, of course; it's been years since Pitt gave a bad performance, and I don't know that Blanchett ever has. Pitt gets to relive every part of his career (including the parts that haven't happened yet), from young heartthrob to old dignitary, all the while playing Benjamin as a soft-spoken Southern gentleman with an endearing touch of fragility about him. Blanchett, I need hardly tell you, is graceful and magnificent in all she does.
The only surprise is how much we are able to care for their characters despite their peculiar circumstances. I think Benjamin's attitude toward life is inspirational: "We can change or stay the same. There are no rules to this thing." He was dealt an unusual, perhaps cruel, hand by fate, but it's still up to him to determine his destiny. And if he can find a way to be happy in spite of his extraordinary situation, well, then what's stopping you?
Grade: B+
Rated PG-13, some profanity, one F-word, a little sexuality, a little violence
2 hrs., 45 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.



This item has 13 comments
December 23, 2008 at 6:51 pm
That's the second time I've heard the term "Dickensian" this month. I need to lie down.
December 25, 2008 at 11:27 am
2 hrs., 45 min.!? :0
December 28, 2008 at 4:59 pm
This movie for me was like Forrest Gump meets Big Fish meets The Notebook, but not as engaging, story-wise, as the first two. It was however, gorgeous to look at, but needlessly overlong.
December 29, 2008 at 10:38 am
It WAS long, but it was mesmerising. It felt like I was reading a novel, with time enough to develop characters, time to watch them grow and change. Lots of texture, and New Orleans was lovingly portrayed as the dangerous hussy she is...LOL
December 30, 2008 at 10:59 pm
I thought the movie was interesting but slow in places because the main character needed to DO SOMETHING....overcome an obstacle or achieve something other than simply growing young.
December 30, 2008 at 11:10 pm
Even though the movie was really long and parts were a little boring, the entire thing overall was simply amazing. I liked that all of the sexual scenes were classy, and that Pitt and Blanchett played their roles perfectly. I love this movie.
January 3, 2009 at 2:11 pm
I personally take a half point for any movie that is over 2 hours and 15 minutes long so the best that a movie this long can ever really hope for on my scale is an A-. With that said, this one was unnecessarily long. I think the movie ended with a wrap up when he left and their daughter opened all of the cards. I don't think I needed to see the end, it was apparent that he was going to grow younger.
January 4, 2009 at 3:02 pm
Much too long. Not a love story. The main character was not interested in engaging himself in anything in life. He should not have been born old in a baby's body. That makes no sense. He should have been born old and as an adult. How distracting to watch Button physically grow taller and yet he was aging backwards! What? Roger Ebert nailed it.
Was this movie suppose to be about missed opportunities? The main character may have gone through the motions in life but was not engaged in life at all; it was like Button/Pitt was sleep-walking through the movie. Melancholy? Yes, but that does NOT mean one should see this movie. Julia Ormond was very good in her role and perhaps should have been in Blanchett's role instead. The stereotyping of Button's mother was not pleasant to watch (I saw the movie in Nashville, TN and quite a few audience members laughed frequently when his mother spoke). Also ,there was NO chemistry b/n Pitt and Blanchett.
I wonder what the movie would have been like if 1) the main character had motivation in life to do something, 2) there was no "love story,", 3) it was edited a good hour!
Finally, people are confusing Brad Pitt's attractiveness and celebrity (however unwanted) with acting. He was as flat as cardboard here - but perhaps that was suppose to be the point of the character - don't know. Overall: yawn, zzzzzz!
January 18, 2009 at 7:03 pm
Is this filmed in two parts? Good grief. I paid to see the first half and then came back a week later to see the second.
January 18, 2009 at 10:53 pm
Cate Blanchett with a southern accent FTW; but Benjamin Button kept dragging on, always pausing dramatically on Brad Pitt's face, a lot like Meet Joe Black, FTL
June 1, 2009 at 9:10 am
What was the deal with the clock? It's only purpose seemed to be to explain how it happened that someone was born and aged younger. If we're going to accept the premise that it's possible for a kid to be born like that, does there really have to be some weird explanation for it?
June 6, 2009 at 1:10 am
I just wasted almost three hours on this movie....WAAAAYYYYY too long, not particulary interesting and the growing old in reverse gets old after the first....10 minutes. Plus the two main characters love story if you call it that .....all they did was have sex. Eric calls it an "old-fashioned love story." I couldnt sense an ounce of chemistry between the characters other than...
Daisy: "Sleep with me!"
Benjamin: "Absolutely!"
Yes, that is actual dialogue from this long, boring, stupid movie. (Did I mention LOOONG!!!)
March 12, 2010 at 6:09 pm
I agree with Wintergreen - I really felt like I was reading a memoir or an epic novel. I really enjoyed the movie. As someone from Baton Rouge (about 45 minutes away from New Orleans), the accents got to me - I don't know anyone who talks with that dainty southern accent. That's my only complaint, though, and it's more of a movie-pet-peeve of mine than a complaint. Other than that, it was a great movie.