Eric D. Snider

The Kingdom

Movie Review

"The Kingdom"

Review by Eric D. Snider

Grade: B+

Rating: R

Released: Friday, September 28, 2007

Directed by:

Cast:

"The Kingdom" offers the satisfaction of a crowd-pleasing police procedural -- the mystery is solved; the bad guys are caught -- tempered with the uneasiness of a terrorism thriller. It suggests that evil-doers can be tracked down and punished, which is comforting. But it also suggests that if both sides are convinced they're right and are willing to die to prove it, the battle might never end.

It begins with a devastating attack on a housing compound in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where American oil company employees and their families live. The Saudi government, after initially insisting that U.S. investigators stay out to avoid looking weak before the Saudi people, grudgingly allows a small team of FBI personnel into Riyadh, just for a few days, and only if they promise to follow instructions.

The team is led by Ronald Fluery (Jamie Foxx), a seasoned FBI commander and "CSI"-worthy detective, with medical doctor Janet Mayes (Jennifer Garner) and investigators Adam Leavitt (Jason Bateman) and Grant Sykes (Chris Cooper) rounding out the squad. Their Saudi contact is Col. Al-Ghazi (Ashraf Barhom), a military officer who is disgruntled at being saddled with babysitting the FBI. He's more than happy to follow his orders, which are to prevent the FBI from actually doing anything.

His reluctance wears off, of course, and Al-Ghazi and Fluery establish a sort of friendship based on mutual respect as the investigation goes forward. Al-Ghazi is a good man and an observant Muslim who cares for his aging father and genuinely wants to root out the terrorists who have blemished his country's (and his religion's) reputation. His and Fluery's relationship borders on being a buddy-cop odd-couple scenario, though fortunately it never quite succumbs to that cliche.

The prime suspect in the attack is Abu Hamza, an "Osama wannabe" whose whereabouts are difficult to ascertain but whose followers are numerous and devoted. After some clever clue-finding on the part of the Feds (marbles are a factor), the film shifts into its more suspenseful act, in which militants work to kill the FBI crew if possible, or to thwart their investigation at the least.

This is director Peter Berg's fourth film, following "Very Bad Things," the surprisingly entertaining "The Rundown," and the mature sports drama "Friday Night Lights," and he continues to defy expectations. "The Kingdom" is packed with information and characters, and features the you-are-there handheld camerawork that can be unnerving when it's overused. It's a smart film with deep themes. Yet Berg allows it to work as entertainment, too. Matthew Michael Carnahan's script finds places for the lead actors to occasionally do what they're best-known for, whether it's Jamie Foxx cracking a joke, Jason Bateman being dryly sarcastic, or Chris Cooper giving someone a withering look that indicates he is not interested in any nonsense.

The entire film is effortlessly compelling, with a natural mix of lighter moments, white-knuckle tension, and crime-solving nitty-gritty, but it's bookended by two unforgettable scenes. At the beginning is perhaps the most educational opening credit sequence I've ever seen, with swift graphics summarizing the last century of U.S.-Saudi relations. It's not absolutely vital to know all of that before you watch the film, but it certainly enhances the experience.

And at the end of the film is an emotional, haunting denouement that resolves an earlier thread while perfectly encapsulating the film's message. The last line of dialogue in a movie is almost never very important, so you notice it all the more when it is. This one stayed with me for days. So did the rest of the movie.

Grade: B+

Rated R, a fair amount of harsh profanity and very strong violence, some of which is rather brutal

1 hr., 50 min.

This item has 6 comments

  1. Tim Kunkel says:

    It also has the integrity (unique for Hollywood) to have Muslim fanatics as primary antagonists (shocka!), instead of rolling out some tired 'bad guys' like communists or nazis.

  2. milkshake says:

    My 9 bucks were not wasted on this movie - there is plenty of drama, bombs going off and shoot-outs all over, the acting is decent and the plot makes sense. The story is unfortunately all too relevant.

  3. Rob D. says:

    Very good review Eric. I thought the movie was very good. I'm really shocked that so many reviewers didn't like it. Jamie Foxx proves again that he is one of the best young actors around.

  4. Rob D. says:

    After reading some other reviewers take on The Kingdom (many negative), it seems that this wasn't good politcally for them as it shows the terrorists to be crazy religious fanatic Muslims (which they are). I honestly thought that the movie took a lot of shots at the U.S.A. and it would make liberal critics happy. It basically blamed us for 9-11 in the first minute. It said that the first Gulf War and our need for Saudi oil was the reason that Bin Laden had his men attack us. There were a few other subtle jabs but nothing that bad. Still, it wasn't good enough for the critics who gave it poor reviews because of their political bias. I guess they think we should sit down and try to talk and reason with our enemy when they are trying to film a beheading.

  5. David Manning says:

    Yes, I was surprised to see so many negative reviews when I finally checked this movie's status on RottenTomatoes, more than two weeks after I had seen it at the theater. I certainly think it's worthy of a B+.

  6. Heidi says:

    I saw this last night and sadly missed the first 10 minutes, which made it a little hard to follow. I think I will brush up on my Saudi history and knowledge and then I'll see it again.

    The end really was amazing.

Add your comment:

The following HTML elements are allowed: <strong>, <em>, <a>, and <img>.

Before posting, please read the rules.

 
This site created and maintained by Jeff J. Snider