Eric D. Snider

The Kite Runner

Movie Review

"The Kite Runner"

Review by Eric D. Snider

Grade: C+

Rating: PG-13

Released: Friday, December 21, 2007

Directed by:

Cast:

"The Kite Runner" might be the year's best example of a well-meaning movie that doesn't have anything significantly wrong with it -- it just doesn't have anything significantly right with it, either. I feel just as bad criticizing it as I would recommending it.

Anemically adapted by "Troy" screenwriter David Benioff from Khaled Hosseini's bestselling novel, "The Kite Runner" was directed by Marc Forster. In tone, it falls somewhere between the two films he's best known for: It has alarming plot elements like "Monster's Ball," but it's toned down and glossed up like "Finding Neverland." Consequently, those traumatic events barely register, either with the characters or with the viewer.

It's an American production that was shot partially in China with dialogue mostly in Dari, a Persian dialect spoken in Afghanistan. It is in Kabul in 1978 that we meet Amir (Zekeria Ebrahimi) and Hassan (Ahmad Khan Mahmidzada), two young boys and best friends. Amir's father, called Baba (Homayoun Ershadi), is a wealthy politician, and Hassan is the son of their housekeeper. They are an expert kite-flying team (a popular sport among the children in their neighborhood), and Hassan -- an intensely calm boy -- is more than happy to be the one who fetches the kite when it falls.

Baba thinks Amir is weak and spineless; meanwhile, he dotes on the less-fortunate Hassan and his father, treating the lad like a second son. When bullies pick on Amir for having a "flat-nosed Hazara" for a friend (referring to Hassan's ethnicity), Amir's resentment grows. He later fails to act to prevent harm from befalling Hassan, then compounds his guilt by sabotaging his friendship with him. For all of this he cannot forgive himself.

We jump ahead 10 years. Everyone fled Kabul when the Soviets invaded in 1979; Amir (now played by Khalid Abdalla) now lives with his ailing old father in California, maintaining a booth at an open-air market while trying to become a professional writer. His ambitions aren't taken seriously, not by his dad, and not by Taheri (Qadir Farookh), a once-powerful Afghan general that Baba wants to impress. But Taheri's beautiful daughter Soraya (Atossa Leoni) takes Amir seriously, and they fall in love.

Eventually Amir must return to his homeland, now firmly under Taliban rule, to make amends with Hassan's family. It is meant to be his act of redemption, but the film's muted tone hasn't succeeded at conveying the enormity of his guilt, so the redemption doesn't feel as sweet as it ought to.

The children who play young Amir and Hassan are non-actors, and they give natural, unforced performances. It's hard to say whether two boys with more acting experience could have done more to bring the characters' complex emotions and motivations to light. I'm inclined to think yes -- though there's something to be said for the authenticity Forster got with these two.

Khalid Abdalla and Homayoun Ershadi are fine as the adult Amir and his father, with Shaun Toub giving a nice anchor performance as Rahim Kahn, a family friend who comes in and out of Amir's life. The movie's flaws are not large enough to make it unwatchable, or even "bad." It's the kind of film whose major accomplishment is to make you think, "Wow, the book is probably really good. I should have stayed home and read it."

Grade: C+

Rated PG-13, a little profanity, some moderate violence including a rape

2 hrs., 7 min.; mostly in Dari with subtitles

This item has 6 comments

  1. P V says:

    "...more than happy to be the one who fetches the kite when it falls."

    Please. You don't even know the cultural reference here - no one fetches the kite when it falls. Running after a kite cut loose is just as exciting as cutting someone's kite loose. It's the thrill of the chase, the prize of victory. Crowds of children run (in case you didn't notice this in the movie) after a kite.

    Don't undermine a cultural event if you know nothing about it. Your review totally fails to acknowledge important aspects of the film and is as self-important as your website. Might serve you well to visit a few countries before reviewing foreign films.

    As a brilliant man once said, "... and no matter what, don't bore your reader."

  2. ClobberGirl says:

    #1 P V: "Might serve you well to visit a few countries before reviewing foreign films." This statement is presumptuous as well as ridiculous. Presumptuous because, if you'd spent a bit more time perusing the site, you would know that Eric has been to "a few" countries, so if that's all you really meant then I guess Eric can review foreign films with your blessing. What you probably meant was that he ought to visit the country a foreign film is set in before he can review the film, and that's where you get ridiculous. It'd be like someone saying you can't critique "The Ring" (American version) unless you've been to the Pacific Northwest, or saying you can't critique "Rain Man" unless you have experience with ASD people.

    Bottom line, it's the responsibility of filmmakers to explain a movie to their intended audience, and *The Kite Runner* was made by Americans for an American audience. If they didn't explain the significance of the cultural references they were using, that's their own fault, not Eric's.

    As for your final quote, grats on the non sequitur. And merry Christmas.

  3. Phil says:

    I don't know why PV got so upset. That was a minor line in his review. I thought the movie was pretty good, but the book was far superior.

  4. Mandar says:

    I never felt that this was a kind of a book that could be made into a movie. The book does point all those "cultural events" but if you show all of that in the movie, it just gets boring.

    Haven't seen the movie yet, and this review doesn't make me want to see it either.

  5. ali says:

    hi.i am from afghanistan and this is gona be the story of my people . but when i saw the film i found it war from reality .and there is not pashton like showing on the film or hazara like showing on the film . you never know the real pashton or hazara or afghan people from this bull [swear word] movy. it why not accept by afghan peple.

  6. chris says:

    the resembalance of the book to the movie was amazing i also liked the book better than the movie because the book was more detailed and included for detail on events that took place.

Add your comment:

The following HTML elements are allowed: <strong>, <em>, <a>, and <img>.

Before posting, please read the rules.

 
This site created and maintained by Jeff J. Snider