Eric D. Snider

The Notebook

I have never read any books by Nicholas Sparks, but I have to believe they are not very good. "The Notebook" is the third one to be adapted for film, after "A Walk to Remember" and "Message in a Bottle," and the third one to be mediocre and treacly.

It is set in rural South Carolina in the 1940s. The wealthy Hamilton family of Charleston has a summer home in this tiny town, and local lumber worker Noah Calhoun (Ryan Gosling) immediately takes note of Allie Hamilton (Rachel McAdams), a beautiful 17-year-old with an infectious laugh. He convinces her to go on a date with him -- threatens to throw himself off the Ferris wheel if she doesn't, actually -- and soon teen love is in full bloom.

Allie's parents, including her absurdly mustached father (David Thornton) and her charm-and-good-graces mother (Joan Allen), do not approve of Noah, of course, since he is a common laborer with no money. But it is just a summer fling, and Allie is going to college in New York in the fall.

Due to tragic misunderstandings and both parties' fiery temperaments, Allie and Noah split on bad terms, and when he writes letters to her thereafter, her mother hides them from her. Noah goes off to World War II, and Allie meets a soldier whose family has money, Lon Hammond (James Marsden), whom Mom and Dad accept with open arms.

All of this is framed by a story set in the present, where an elderly man (James Garner) visits a woman (Gena Rowlands) at a nursing home every day and reads a story to her. It is apparently a device to help refresh her memory; we gather she has Alzheimer's or something. It's obvious that she is Allie.

The only question, if there is any question, is which man James Garner is: Noah or Lon. I don't think there's much suspense on that issue, but the movie, directed by Nick Cassavetes (son of Gena Rowlands and her late husband, the director John Cassavetes), withholds information about the elderly couple long enough to convince me they were hoping to surprise us.

The cast, which also includes Sam Shepard as Noah's craggy, down-to-earth father, is stellar, and the whole thing almost works. Gosling and McAdams make a nice couple, and Garner and Rowlands are both, even at this stage in their careers, as sharp as ever. Some of their moments together are legitimately touching.

But the movie is too simple-minded. When it doesn't know what to do with a character anymore, it has the character die. It allows its plot to progress almost entirely without opposition. The story of young love is charming, but it needs a real conflict, and "my parents don't approve of you and my mom hid your letters" doesn't count. Angst has been substituted for drama, and while it's a sweet movie, it's also drearily uninspired. I suspect the couples who would enjoy it thoroughly would equally enjoy sitting at home and gazing into each other's eyes for two hours.

Grade: C+

Rated PG-13, some mild profanity, a little sexuality, brief partial nudity

2 hrs., 1 min.

Digg! Stumble It!

This item has 5 comments

  1. Kristen Jones says:

    Hello, I have to say that I totally disagree with your review, and not because I'm a woman. The reason why this movie did so well with viewers is because it's a straight story. Many movies have too much crap in them and you get lost in the movie and when it's over you don't even know what the movie was really about. With the Notebook you get a straight story. Yes, half the stuff that happen in the movie are far from reality, but that's what we love and that's what a good movie should be. In most womens eyes that's how we see true love.

  2. Andrew D says:

    What part of the review do you disagree with again?

  3. Kristine M. says:

    I agree with Kristen,very much so, because it's very true. This is a great movie ... we don't always know what is going to happen but it adds a little twist in the end when they die together. Its a love story, what do you expect? Like the Titanic not everything is true and it was far from reality ....... but that's what makes a good movie and makes people want to see it again and again and again. But if you don't have the taste for it thats your perspecting,personally I thought this was a great story and I also see this as true love.

  4. beau says:

    I agree with #1 and #3, this movie is fantastic. It is suspenseful and succeeded in making me attached to the screen for a couple of hours and with Rachel Mcadams being as attractive as she is, it makes it even easier. She was fantastic, the realism of the situations between noah and her were highly believable. This movie took a different approach from other love stories, we were told this through them as they were old. The 1940's setting made it interesting aswell, aswe are taken inside the life of Allie, through her parents and how they lived in society during that era compared to other people whom her parents describe as "trash".

    A highly compelling and entertaining film.

  5. Seripa says:

    I must say I agree with Eric,

    My fiance and I did enjoy watching this movie, and, indeed, we would enjoy spending two hours sitting at home and gazing into each other's eyes.

    I also agree that the story was simplistic and tried to create suspense where there was none.

Add your comment:

The following HTML elements are allowed: <span class="spoiler">content</span>, <strong>, <em>, <a>, and <img>.

Before posting, please read the rules.


Subscription Center

Eric D. Snider's "Snide Remarks"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly humor column, "Snide Remarks." For more information, go here.

Subscribe

Eric D. Snider's "In the Dark"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly movie-review e-zine. For more information on it, go here.

Subscribe
 
Come read about baseball and web development at www.jeffjsnider.com