The year is 1981. The Rubik's Cube is all the rage. Newly elected President Reagan is on TV talking about the lousy economy and what he plans to do about it. And Chris Gardner has to take his son to a daycare center where they let the kids watch TV all day and where the word "happiness" is misspelled in the window.
That errant "y" is a symbol of all things mediocre and unacceptable in "The Pursuit of Happyness," a genuinely uplifting and appealing dramedy starring Will Smith as Chris Gardner and his real-life son Jaden Christopher Syre Smith as his little boy. The film was Based on a True Story, yet, as written by Steven Conrad ("The Weather Man") and directed by Gabriele Muccino (whose excellent "L'Ultimo Bacio" was recently non-excellently remade as "The Last Kiss"), it avoids being heavy-handed or preachy like so many Based on a True Storys. The important life lessons aren't overdone, nor are the Kleenex moments hammered incessantly.
Chris and his son, Chris Jr., live in San Francisco, initially with Chris' wife (Thandie Newton), though she isn't in the picture for very long. Chris thought he'd found a way to make a good living, selling bone-density scanners to doctors and hospitals, but it turns out the devices are expensive and their advantages over x-ray machines not terribly clear. More unfortunately, Chris has to lug one around with him all the time as a sample.
With almost no income being derived from the bone-density scanners, Chris suffers one setback after another, first with his wife, then with his apartment. One of the scanners -- which Chris already paid for and must sell to recoup his investment -- gets lost. Figuring he's good with numbers and good with people, he works hard to get into a broker-trainee program with Dean Witter, only to discover it's an unpaid internship. But if he can excel at that and become a stock broker for real, then maybe things will finally begin to go right.
What "The Pursuit of Happyness" does better than most by-your-bootstraps films is to make us root for the protagonist as if he were our own flesh and blood. Every situation Chris finds himself in could go either way, positive or negative, with no foregone conclusions, no obvious paths the story "has" to take. We see him nearing the end of his rope, still caring deeply for his son, trying to shield him from their complete poverty, spending some nights at a shelter and some nights on the floor of a train station bathroom, and through it all, we honestly WANT him to succeed.
This can be attributed to Will Smith's famed likableness, of course, and to his refreshingly unaffected performance here. His action-star catchphrases ("Aw, HELL no!") are absent, and so are the mugging and posturing that have often been part of his more larger-than-life characters. Chris Gardner is nothing more than a decent man -- an astonishingly honest, decent man. (Smith's son, 8-year-old Jaden, shows signs of becoming as charismatic as his old man when he grows up. But can he rap about growing up in West Philly?)
Part of me cringes a little to realize the film seems equate the pursuit of happiness (which Chris often refers to) with the pursuit of money. Chris is unhappy now; he'll be happy when he starts collecting a paycheck. But I don't think that's really the point. Chris doesn't want to be rich. He just wants to support himself and his son. I don't think it's too grossly capitalistic to suggest that it might be a source of happiness to have a place to live other than the train station bathroom.
The film, doggedly optimistic and upbeat, suggests that the American Dream really works sometimes. The fact that Chris is a minority (he's black, of course, though the film never refers to it) doesn't hinder him. He is never shown applying for welfare or food stamps, even though he would surely qualify for both. No, instead he just keeps trying. His stamina and determination are amazing, and the film is truly inspiring.
Grade: B+
Rated PG-13, one F-word, nothing else
1 hr., 57 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.
This item has 7 comments
December 18, 2006 at 7:44 am
You want him to succeed SO MUCH, that at the end of the movie, when he is bouncing exuberantly along amidst the lifeless throng you just want to jump up out of your theater seat and go high-five the screen. Yeah!!! (Meanwhile, Eric, you did not adequately explain why you only gave the movie a B+. What did it lack?)
December 18, 2006 at 11:01 am
Good film, made very good by Smith's performance. I thought his son did a great job as well, and he has a great sense of timing, particularly on the comedic stuff.
I will say one thing. Although Chris' emotion at the end of the film is the extraordinary relief he feels to be able to provide for his son, Chris does want to make money. He does want to be rich. And there is nothing immoral about that. When he sees the Dean Witter broker and the Ferrari, he wants that. Nothing wrong with wanting it either. I do agree that what he wants most, and most urgently, is to take care of his son.
Good film.
December 27, 2006 at 12:54 pm
I agree with Eric's rating, I thought the movie was above average, but not great. I thought that Thandie Newton's performance was so artificial and her character had one characteristic: bitchiness. Most of the movie is us feeling bad for Will Smith, or watching him run and scream at crazy people alot. It was one big ameba of depression. I never saw any love between him and his wife, so it was hard for me to feel bad about their seperation, in fact I was almost happy about it. I was happy for him at the end, but I would have been happier for him if we were to see better interaction and dialogue between he and his wife and son earlier in the film. Great acting by Smith and his son. And some great moments in the dialogue, but these characters could have been written better. Still, above average.
December 30, 2006 at 8:10 am
The movie has a bit of sappyness but it was still effective. It was nice to see something other than the usual trashyness Hollywood usually has to offer. For those who are not obsessive-compulsive enough to be severely bothered by the title's intentional misspelling, the movie should provide a fair dose of dramatic happyness.
Actually, I haven't seen the movie and just wanted to try those dumb puns.
January 3, 2007 at 5:31 am
Actually Brian, I'm sure that it was the intent of the filmmakers to make everyone happy about their separation. They didn't want to make his wife a sympathetic character. If they did, they would have casted a prettier actress and made her a non-smoker. It was better this way as it was more about a father taking care of his son instead of a complete family struggling.
January 31, 2007 at 2:51 pm
I disagree. I think that the purpose was to make us sympathetic towards his character having to deal with a divorce, and being a single father, but we weren't. We were happy that he was away from this psycho cow. I agree that she is not supposed to be a sympathetic character, but she is supposed to be a human being.
April 20, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Do you believe there's a father and also a man could be that patient and strong?? Well, if it is a real story, anyone who could be like that, i'm sure he is a great dad and a great man. I mean, for real, i never seen anyone like that before. It's only in the movie. But i'm not hoping i'll be like that. Well, maybe this movie taught me many lessons. And i think (this just what i think) this movie should get an A+ for the strength and spirit and other good things in life. Go fight!