Eric D. Snider

The Three Musketeers

Movie Review

"The Three Musketeers"

Review by Eric D. Snider

Grade: F

Rating: PG-13

Released: Friday, October 21, 2011

Directed by:

Cast:

Paul W.S. Anderson's version of "The Three Musketeers" is a wicked parody of the dumbed-down, tarted-up literary adaptations that Hollywood is famous for. The modern dialogue, the superhero-like physical abilities, the utter abandonment of logic in favor of inane spectacle -- what a hilarious exaggeration of Hollywood's lowest-common-denominator mentality! The only way the joke could have been driven home any better is if the film were called "The Three Musketeers: To the Exxtreme!"

Ah, but you'll have to forgive me, for I have employed sarcasm. In truth, "The Three Musketeers" is not a parody of terrible movies; it is an actual terrible movie, one that reinforces the stereotype that the way to get ahead in Hollywood is to come up with the stupidest ideas you can -- or better yet, stupidize someone else's smart ideas -- and pour money on them. Picture a comedy sketch where some hack pitches his awful ideas to an eager studio executive: "It's 'The Three Musketeers,' but with high-tech gadgets and a mid-air battle between two dirigibles!" It's one of those fake bad movies that people joke about, except that someone actually made it. I'm genuinely surprised that none of the characters turns out to be a robot.

I hardly know where to begin. I almost want to recommend that you watch it just so you can see firsthand how dazzlingly moronic it is, how stupefyingly dumb. Unfortunately, one of its myriad flaws is that it ends with a transparently cynical attempt to set up a sequel, and I cannot in good conscience advise you to do anything that would encourage this. So if you want to see "The Three Musketeers" out of morbid curiosity or due to a chemical imbalance in your brain, please do not pay for it.

Using Alexandre Dumas' novel the way a tobacco chewer uses a spittoon, screenwriters Alex Litvak ("Predators") and Andrew Davies create a version of early 17th-century Paris that is remarkably similar to early 21st-century Los Angeles in terms of people's vocabularies, accents, and attitudes. Our noble musketeers -- romantic Athos (Matthew Macfadyen), clever Aramis (Luke Evans), and brawny Porthos (Ray Stevenson) -- are out of work ever since the evil Cardinal Richelieu (Christoph Waltz) gained the trust of the king and put his own army in charge of keeping the peace. Adding insult to injury, the musketeers were double-crossed by the poisonous Milady de Winter (Milla Jovovich), who used them to break into Leonardo da Vinci's secret vault and steal a design for a flying war machine, then sold the plans to England's Duke of Buckingham (Orlando Bloom).

(Does Leonardo's secret vault have ingenious locking mechanisms and elaborate booby traps that can only be thwarted by someone with the same physical powers as the woman from "Resident Evil"? You better believe it!)

Soon the lads are joined by D'Artagnan (Logan Lerman), a smart-mouthed little bastard from the sticks who has come to Paris to be a musketeer. This cocky, mannequin-headed punk immediately starts picking senseless fights with people like Rochefort (Mads Mikkelson), the head of Richelieu's guard, as well as the musketeers themselves. He seemed like such a nice kid when he bade his parents farewell, but evidently the three-day journey to Paris turned him into an insufferable frat boy. He is the hero of the movie.

Richelieu wants to provoke a war with England so that he can usurp power over a destabilized France. To that end, he hires double agent Milady to plant evidence in London and Paris suggesting that France's queen Anne (Juno Temple) is having an affair with Buckingham. Anne's husband, King Louis XIII (Freddie Fox), is a vapid teenager whose primary concern is dressing more fashionably than Buckingham, and whose marriage to Anne was arranged for political reasons. Inexplicably, Louis becomes friends with D'Artagnan and seeks advice from him on how to gain the sincere affections of his queen. The entire film hinges on this one weird subplot.

Well, next thing you know, Buckingham has built one of those Leonardo war machines, and it's a zeppelin, and King Louis thinks it's really cool. Due to a complicated series of dumb events, D'Artagnan and the musketeers must go to England, break into the Tower of London, commandeer the airship, and have a fight with Rochefort's troops, who it turns out ALSO have an airship, because they hurried up and built one, secretly, while the four musketeers were crossing the Channel. Rochefort's zeppelin has been fashioned to look like a pirate ship, complete with an enormous skeleton carved on the prow.

And so on. Look, it's not that I think "The Three Musketeers" shouldn't be desecrated. It's an old book, and it's in French, and what do I care? You want to add grappling hooks and razor wire and secret passageways and chubby comic relief characters and people being pooped on by birds and ornate flying machines that can be built in less than a week, hey, be my guest. All I ask is that you do it well.

Paul W.S. Anderson, who possesses technical skill but is a terrible storyteller, doesn't do it well. He flings everything he can at this pile of garbage in a doomed effort to shape it into something coherent, and fails utterly. It's no surprise that he's made a bad movie -- he's done it before ("Death Race," "Mortal Kombat," "Alien vs. Predator") and will probably do it again -- but it is a little surprising how this one manages to be bad in so many different ways. This pointless, ill-conceived, brain-dead train wreck might supplant "Battlefield Earth" as society's favorite you-gotta-see-it-to-believe-it cinematic disaster. Nondescript characters, flat acting, bland dialogue, contradictory plot points, lethargic sword fights, illogical motivations, wasteful misuse of Christoph Waltz, that damnable airship battle -- it's all just so stupid, so very very stupid. And every time you think it can't get any stupider, it gets right up in your face, calls you "bro," and gets stupider. The only thing that makes it stop getting stupider is that it finally ends, and even then you can see it still struggling.

Grade: F

Rated PG-13, a little mild profanity, swashbuckling action violence

1 hr., 50 min.

Digg! Stumble It!

Notes:

Contrary to regular industry practice, this film was not screened for critics before opening.

This item has 13 comments

  1. Jack B Nimble says:

    This movie brought to you by the planet Jupiter, the source of all things stupider.

  2. DaveW says:

    Eric, tell us how you *really* feel about this movie. lol

  3. Thoughtful Observer says:

    I am so glad that this movie is as bad as I was expecting. I am one who hates it when someone in Hollywood takes the title of a book that they never read and turns it into a movie based on a drunk frat-boy's half-remembered Cliff-notes version of the plot. It fills me with glee when these turn out to be so terrible on so many levels. Oh, and I chortled at the end of this review.

  4. Euphrasie says:

    The real question is: can it possibly be any stupider than the Barbie Three Musketeers version? I'm not sure that's humanly possible. Maybe with superhuman superstupid powers...

  5. WeirdMovieFan says:

    Fantastic review. (Not that I expected any different.) Almost makes the existence of this movie worth dealing with... I feel a deep surge of rage whenever I see commercials for this, so awful does it look. I dearly hope this is a flop on "Bucky Larson" levels, as that was only other movie out this year that made me feel more angry than this.

  6. WeirdMovieFan says:

    But is it worse than the Demi Moore version of The Scarlet Letter? Can anything be worse than that?

  7. Dan says:

    But when you re-watch this in ten years, are you going to revise it to a C-?

  8. Hoss says:

    I scoffed every time I saw an ad for this on TV, though for some reason I initially thought it was Rachel McAdams in this, perhaps because recently she's taken over Keira Knightly's role as the only woman allowed to star in period pieces. Then when I realized it was Milla Jovovich I wondered why anyone would cast her. Knowing it's Paul W. S. Anderson answers all my questions. Sort of amused to hear it's even worse than it looks.

  9. Rachel says:

    Sounds delightfully awful... but I still am not convinced that it will be worse than the inane "Mission to Mars" .

  10. Bret says:

    I can't wait to see this Rifftraxed! I wonder if I should watch it first without or not...

  11. Argus_Skyhawk says:

    I seem to recall that the 1993 version of The Three Musketeers was lame, the 2001 version called The Musketeer was dull, and what little I saw of the 1997 version of The Man in the Iron Mask was nothing great. It seems Hollywood has been having trouble adapting these characters in recent years.

  12. Josh says:

    It sounds like that Simpsons episode where they watched "The Poke of Zorro" where Zorro had to defeat the Three Muskateers and the man in the iron mask to restore King Arthur to his throne! At the end of the movie the credits showed a character called Robot Zorro, lol. Back in the days when The Simpsons was still funny...

  13. Russ says:

    @Argus_Skyhawk: might I suggest Wishbone?

Add your comment:

The following HTML elements are allowed: <span class="spoiler">content</span>, <strong>, <em>, <a>, and <img>.

Before posting, please read the rules.


Subscription Center

Eric D. Snider's "Snide Remarks"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly humor column, "Snide Remarks." For more information, go here.

Subscribe

Eric D. Snider's "In the Dark"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly movie-review e-zine. For more information on it, go here.

Subscribe
 
Visit Jeff J. Snider's website