Eric D. Snider

Eric D. Snider's Blog

Shocking twist to the Paramount ban: Paramount had nothing to do with it!

For readers unfamiliar with the saga of the Paramount ban, I will recap it briefly before moving on to the surprising recent developments.

In July 2006, I went on an all-expenses-paid press junket for the film “World Trade Center.” I then wrote a column making fun of the whole shady practice, in which “journalists” are essentially wined and dined in exchange for fluffy, favorable coverage.

Paramount got mad at what I wrote and banned me — not just from future junkets (which I had no interest in anyway; this was a one-time thing), but from its press screenings, too. Press screenings are held, for most films, a few days before they open theatrically. All film critics in the major U.S. markets are invited to attend them. I was now removed from this list.

Now, the way these press screenings work is that they are handled in each market by a local public relations or advertising agency. In Portland, where I live, Paramount is handled by the Seattle office of Allied Advertising, which has branches around the U.S., most of which focus on film publicity. No one from Paramount ever contacted me directly. Instead, they had their Seattle publicist at Allied tell me I’d been banned. It was this Seattle office that had set up the junket I attended.

This Allied publicist also said that, in solidarity with Paramount, they were banning me from their other clients’ screenings too. Luckily, besides Paramount, Allied in Seattle only handled the Weinstein Company and Miramax. The other big studios were handled by other Seattle agencies, and none of them cared. (One of the other publicists even called me to say how funny and dead-on she thought the article was.)

So ever since then, my understanding has been that Paramount was mad, and that Allied in Seattle had removed me from their press list entirely. I kind of assumed that Paramount had strong-armed Allied into the latter decision.

But now new facts have come to light. Last week, I was going to be in Salt Lake City for a few days, and I wanted to attend the press screenings of “The Incredible Hulk” and “The Happening” while I was there. They are Universal and Fox pictures, respectively, not Paramount. And in Portland, neither of them is handled by Allied, so I was invited to the screenings at home.

However, in SLC, those studios are handled by the Denver branch of Allied. I had a moment’s pause when I called that office to find out about the press screenings, but then I thought: That’s silly. It was only the Seattle office that I ever had trouble with, and really only with Paramount. Surely Allied doesn’t have some company-wide no-fly list with my name on it.

“Hulk” was to be a public screening. They tape off a row for critics, but the rest of the theater is filled with regular folks, mostly people who won passes by calling in to radio stations or by picking them up somewhere in town. Plus, critics are allowed to bring guests. So there was no need for me to ask permission to attend. I could just go as the “guest” of one of my local critic pals.

“The Happening,” though, was a press-only screening, no guests, so I’d need to be invited. The publicist handling the account at the Denver Allied office ducked my calls. She didn’t respond to my e-mail, either. I didn’t want to get paranoid. I figured it was a Fox thing, not allowing online critics to its press screenings, which that studio has done before. Sure, I’d been invited up in Portland, but maybe Denver and Allied were going by an old set of rules. No big deal.

Then one of my critic pals in SLC told me this: The Denver Allied office had told him that I was not allowed at “The Incredible Hulk,” either. The screening that was open to the public. The screening that could be attended, literally, by a homeless guy who lives in the park, as long as he stopped by the radio station to pick up a ticket. THAT screening, I wasn’t allowed to attend.

As it turns out, Allied DOES have a company-wide no-fly list, and my name IS on it. I am not allowed to attend any Allied screening anywhere in the country, regardless of which studio it is.

Now the facts were starting to seem a little lopsided. All of this in response to one article that made fun of Paramount in Seattle? How does that translate to me not being allowed at a Universal screening in Salt Lake City?

A little more digging confirmed what I’d begun to suspect, the twist ending to this crazy story: It was never Paramount that wanted me banned. It was Allied. We had the wrong villain all along!

Oh, I don’t doubt that someone at Paramount was mad and called someone at Allied to yell at them. But Paramount probably got over it five minutes later. Think about it: Why would the oldest movie studio in America, a multi-billion-dollar company with holdings all over the world, care what some blogger they’d never heard of said about their press junkets?

Allied, on the other hand, is who actually deals directly with the press. They’re the ones who would have felt angry and betrayed by the column. They’re the ones who would hold a grudge for this long, and actively seek to enforce a ban that Paramount would have forgotten about a long, long time ago.

And remember, no one from Paramount ever contacted me. It was an Allied rep in Seattle, who passed it all off as Paramount’s decision, not hers. (In fairness, it wasn’t the Seattle branch of Allied that made the call. It was someone higher up in the Allied hierarchy.)

How intent is Allied on holding this grudge? Someone from the Denver office called the representative who was running the “Hulk” screening in SLC on Monday and told him not to let me in. “Eric Snider’s in town!” she said. “He is not allowed to attend any screenings!” Not as a guest, not as a guy off the street, not at all.

I am not making that up. She actually called to WARN them.

Luckily, there were midnight screenings of “The Incredible Hulk” on Thursday in Las Vegas (where I went after my SLC stop), and I could still write my review in a relatively timely fashion. I paid to see “The Happening” on Friday in Las Vegas, contributing $8 to that film’s “money we stole from innocent moviegoers” fund.

I had no idea Allied Advertising had extended its Eric D. Snider ban to cover the entire country, much less that the organization was still clinging to the grudge so tightly almost two years later. Too bad the whole brouhaha wasn’t over the movie “The Grudge.” Then at least it would have been funny rather than pathetic.

20 Responses to “Shocking twist to the Paramount ban: Paramount had nothing to do with it!”

  1. Andrew D Says:

    I didn’t see that one coming.

  2. Dave Says:

    Talk about your unexpected twist endings! (Take THAT, M. Night!!)

  3. Dave Dorr Says:

    No, the ultimate twist ending would be one where you got a job with a large media group (say, the Chicago Tribune) as their critic and got Allied fired by Paramount through your investigative reporting. That would be AWEsome.

  4. Ampersand Says:

    Touche, Dave. Touche.

    And wow, Allied. Anal retentive much?

  5. ClobberGirl Says:

    That’s incredibly pathetic and petty on Allied’s part. I wish there was something your readers could do about it, but I can’t think of an easy way to put pressure on Allied other than to spread the story of their petty and pathetic behavior as much as possible. Hopefully one day they’ll feel embarrassed enough to grow up.

  6. mommy Says:

    That is just amazing that someone would go to that much trouble! What were you going to do in that screening of the Hulk anyway that they had to call the theater? Did they question everyone going in…Are you Eric Snider? Just silly.

  7. GWGumby Says:

    I doubt they had to question everyone. They just had to pass out lots of “Wanted” posters with Eric’s mug shot on them. Meanwhile, Eric could have put on a thick moustache and sombrero and could have totally sneaked in.

  8. Heli Says:

    Why would they have to ask? Doesn’t everybody recognize Eric by now?

    I mean, he’s on THE INTERNET.

  9. Aaron Says:

    I wonder what other kind of unsavory characters are on this Allied blacklist? Do they have your photo up in their cubicles, like wanted criminal photos in post offices?
    “Warning, these critics should be considered satirical and dangerous.”

    It’s probably just you and everyone from Aint it Cool, though. That’s depressing company.

  10. David Cornelius Says:

    And here I thought Allied was unreasonably crappy and unapologetically rude to online writers locally. Turns out they’re tools nationwide! Must be their mission statement.

  11. Savvy Veteran Says:

    I’ve secretly known this entire time that it was actually TIM NASSON

  12. David Manning Says:

    I guess someone needs to update the Eric D. Snider entry on Wikipedia, then.

  13. gossie21 Says:

    I was thinking it was going to be Tim Nasson too. What benefit does Allied stand to gain from banning a film critic from press screanings? I just don’t get it.

  14. Billy Bob Thorton Says:

    If you can’t be famous, be infamous?

  15. CattSith Says:

    Allied is being completely ridiculous. Their reaction to your column is complete overkill.

    I must say though that you probably shouldn’t have mentioned names in that column. That might have been the straw that broke their overly sensitive back.

  16. Holly from DietCake Says:

    It seems to me that they gave your column far more exposure by banning you than it would have received had they just ignored you.

  17. Jenn Says:

    Wow!! You know you’re cool when you’re getting banned!!!! Way to go Eric!!!

  18. Randy Tayler Says:

    You really need a Digg widget so folks can click this article into popularity. Here’s a link, though: http://digg.com/movies/Movie_Critic_Banned_from_Critics_Screenings

    Do anchor tags work?
    http://digg.com/movies/Movie_Critic_Banned_from_Critics_Screenings

  19. Dave the Slave Says:

    ….I’m pretty sure I read somewhere that Allied’s OFFICIAL company motto is-

    “Allied Advertising: All Your Free Speech Are Belong To Us”

  20. AWOL Says:

    David Manning- I went ahead and updated the Wikipeda article. Please check it out. Eric- I wish I were cool enough to get 86′ed by an advertising agency.

Subscription Center

Eric D. Snider's "Snide Remarks"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly humor column, "Snide Remarks." For more information, go here.

Subscribe

Eric D. Snider's "In the Dark"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly movie-review e-zine. For more information on it, go here.

Subscribe
 
Visit Jeff J. Snider's website | Diamond Clarity Chart