30 Days of Night
Movie Review
"30 Days of Night"
Review by Eric D. Snider
Grade: B+
Rating: R
Released: Friday, October 19, 2007
Directed by:
Cast:
We've all been disappointed by lousy thrillers that had cool ideas but didn't know how to execute them. "30 Days of Night" is the rare horror film that actually lives up to its potential.
Based on a comic book mini-series by Steve Niles and Ben Templesmith, the film's premise is so ingeniously simple you'll wonder why you didn't think of it yourself: A band of vampires targets an isolated Alaska town where there's no sunlight for 30 days at a stretch. That's a lot better than movies about vampires who live in L.A., which makes no sense at all.
These bloodsuckers are smart, making sure to cut off electricity and communication, and to sabotage the local helicopter. Tiny towns like Barrow -- population 563, except during the dark month, when all but 152 of the stalwarts move to sunnier digs -- need a chopper because the nearest community is 80 miles away, and the road to it is often impassable. Everyone lives here because they like the cold and isolation. They live here because "nobody else can," as one character puts it.
We begin in the waning hours of the last day of sunlight as town sheriff Eben Oleson (Josh Hartnett) is scurrying from place to place, making sure the town is ready for the month-long night. His estranged wife, Stella (Melissa George), a state fire marshal, is in town on regulatory business but doesn't want to talk to him. When she finally calls him, it's only to ask for a ride to the tiny local airport before it closes for the night -- so he sends his trusty deputy to chauffeur her instead. Two can play at this game.
Strange things have already begun to happen outside of Eben and Stella's marriage. Someone stole a cache of satellite phones and burned them in a field. A group of sled dogs were murdered at a kennel. There was the aforementioned helicopter vandalism. The likely culprit for it all is a man referred to as The Stranger (Ben Foster), a filthy, rotten-toothed little weasel who isn't a local resident and smugly refuses to tell Eben anything about himself or his activities. He warns that dark things are a-comin', and it ain't just the 30 days of night.
The vampires -- vicious, malformed, shrieking devils who speak their own Germanic-sounding language and have a clear pack leader (Danny Huston) -- beset the village in a hellish attack. Most victims are killed, though a few are turned into vampires themselves. (The rules governing when and how that occurs are not clearly established.) Eben, Stella, and a band of survivors alternate between fighting, hiding, and running. Guns aren't very effective against the beasts, but Eben discovers that an ax can be.
And there you go. There's your vampire movie, uncomplicated, straightforward, suspenseful, and clever when it needs to be. I find it interesting that it was directed by David Slade, whose first film was "Hard Candy," a sexual-predator thriller that was all about tension and apprehension rather than actual on-screen mayhem. "30 Days of Night" gets a lot of mileage from that same type of thrill, particularly in the calculated way the scenario is set, and in the strategic use of silence. Much of the film is eerily quiet, with very little musical accompaniment, and always the low howl of the wind in the background.
Then, gradually, the story becomes grislier and more visceral, though it never stoops to wallowing in the gore. By the end, everyone on both sides is grungy and blood-soaked, and you feel almost as worn out from watching it as they are from experiencing it. Not nearly as cold, though, thank goodness.
Grade: B+
Rated R, some harsh profanity, a fair amount of violence and gore
1 hr., 53 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.



This item has 6 comments
October 19, 2007 at 6:15 pm
When I saw the trailer for this film, I could have sworn it said "Sam Raimi's 30 Days of Night". Does anyone know if Sam Raimi has anything to do with this film, or was I just temporarily crazy?
October 20, 2007 at 7:02 am
Sam Raimi is the producer. According to IMDB, he was slated to direct it but chose to produce later on.
October 21, 2007 at 7:13 pm
"That's a lot better than movies about vampires who live in L.A., which makes no sense at all."
It's funny that you say that, since the sequel graphic novel is about Stella hunting vampires in L.A. I did think that the suspense got a little repetitive (you can only get excited about the characters risking their lives to move to a new hiding spot so many times) and the gore a little gratuitous, but it was still a very fresh, scary vampire flick.
October 23, 2007 at 6:57 am
Regarding the "turning": it seems the head vampire didn't want anyone turned, so I presume all such were actually accidental. In this particular vampire lore, it would appear that most any blood-exchanging physical attack (i.e. being clawed) resulted in the "infection" being spread unless the victim was killed immediately after. Note the guy whose wife was taken, and then was clawed (I think...it happened fast) in the knee, and who later shows up as a vampire.
[Spoilers!]
ClobberGirl, that Stella turns into a vampire hunter is of little surprise to me, since she has this determined look on her face at the end of this. Movie sequel set-up?
October 23, 2007 at 10:01 pm
The main Vampire says (in an early subtilted line) that he does not want anyone turned, so they need to chop off everyones heads after feeding on them. The few humans who "turned" were the ones who were first bitten (or where vampire blood got into their blood stream) and then were NOT beheaded.
At least that's how I understood it...
March 10, 2008 at 9:08 am
[spoiler]
Uhh.. how long could the sun possibly be up the first day after 30 days of night? They're safe for what ... an hour at the very most?