Eric D. Snider

Brüno

Movie Review

"Brüno"

Review by Eric D. Snider

Grade: B

Rating: R

Released: Friday, July 10, 2009

Directed by:

Cast:

It would be difficult to recapture the magic of "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan," Sacha Baron Cohen's fearlessly offensive satire of American culture, not least because the character is now too famous to fool innocent bystanders the way he used to. So instead of a sequel, Baron Cohen has perpetrated a similar series of pranks using a different character from his HBO series "Da Ali G Show," an over-the-top, flamboyantly gay Austrian fashionista named Brüno.

"Brüno" is a worthy follow-up to "Borat" in the sense that it's just as outrageously vulgar and just as liable to cause cringing and gasping in the audience. You will see things in this movie that will make you wish you'd been born sightless. You will probably also laugh until tears render you blind anyway. All of which is fine, but I can't shake the feeling that "Brüno" is a couple pegs below "Borat" in overall genius. Funny, yes. Astute in its satire, not as much.

We are introduced to Brüno -- who's so flamboyantly, over-the-top gay he almost sets off sprinkler systems -- as the host of "Funkyzeit," Austrian TV's most important style show and a forum for Brüno to demonstrate his cheerful shallowness. (The "In or Out" segment declares autism to be "in," while chlamydia is "out.") But after causing a disaster at a fashion show -- a real one that Baron Cohen, in character, really did disrupt -- Brüno is fired. In his own words, "For the second time in a century, the world had turned on Austria's greatest man."

Brüno's goal now is to become rich and famous, which means coming to Hollywood and going into show business. That is the overarching theme in the film: Brüno will do whatever it takes to get famous, whether through acting, philanthropy, adopting an African baby, making a sex tape, getting kidnapped by terrorists, or some other method not yet discovered. Through it all he is accompanied by his devoted assistant, Lutz (Gustaf Hammarsten), who fills the same thankless role as the portly, dark-eyebrowed Azamat (Ken Davitian) in "Borat."

A lot of the pre-written material (Baron Cohen and three others are credited for the screenplay) is extremely funny -- I love the Germanized versions of Hollywood celebrities' names -- and often spot-on in its parody of vapid American TV content. Brüno's obscene pilot episode for a TV style show is hilarious, more so because we view it through the eyes of an unwitting focus group whose members don't know it's all joke.

And that's where the real meat is, of course, those improvised scenes with regular civilians who are unaware that Brüno is a character. (If nothing else, Baron Cohen is alarmingly adept at transforming himself physically. You could put Borat, Brüno, and Baron Cohen next to each other and still need several seconds to realize they're all the same person.) At their best, these scenes give people enough rope to hang themselves, as in the horrifying sequence where parents eager to turn their toddlers into cash cows indicate their willingness to put their children into all sorts of dangerous situations. That desire for fame and fortune is what "Brüno" is really satirizing.

Still very funny but quite a bit less effective from a satiric standpoint are the scenes where Brüno behaves outrageously and bystanders are outraged. Brüno, who has a thing for black guys, adopts a black baby and then appears on a TV talk show with a mostly black studio audience to talk about the woes of single parenthood. The things he says and does, and the audience's reaction to him, are hysterical. (Once, anyway. We were shown this scene at a special preview during South By Southwest and I laughed until I cried. Seeing it again, with the element of surprise gone, takes a lot of the oomph out of it.) But so what? They aren't overreacting or behaving like bigots. Their response to Brüno is natural and appropriate. It's satire without a target.

This becomes more of a problem later, when the film finally gets around to addressing what you thought it was going to address all along: homophobia. Brüno and Lutz run into a group of those "God Hates Fags" pseudo-Christians from Kansas who protest at funerals, and you think, "OK, here we go." But nothing comes of it. In another scene, Brüno, trying to de-gay himself, goes camping with three stereotypical Southern rednecks, but the way he provokes them into action makes HIM the idiot, not them. In legal terms, it's entrapment. Yeah, they get angry with him -- but only after he makes aggressive sexual advances on them. A better tack would have been to put Brüno among homophobes and let their innate bigotry emerge without having to drag it out of them. The film has almost none of that.

Maybe it's inevitable for a second film, but "Brüno" (directed again by Larry Charles) doesn't have quite the same gleefully anarchic spirit as its predecessor, "Borat." The new film feels more calculated and contrived, at least in part because the character himself is more cynical. Where Borat was an earnestly dumb but enthusiastic foreigner who simply wanted to experience America, Brüno has the specific motive of wanting to become famous. Thus, his actions -- and by extension the behind-the-scenes work of making the film -- seem less free-spirited, more agenda-driven. ("Borat," the film, had an agenda too, of course -- it just wasn't as obvious about it.)

But while "Brüno" lacks focus and may not be as sharp as it could be, it still offers plenty of smart, raucous entertainment. Whether it holds up on repeat viewings is beside the point; that first time is a doozy. Don't forget the eye bleach.

Grade: B

Rated R, a lot of graphic sexuality and nudity, abundant vulgarity and profanity

1 hr., 23 min.

Digg! Stumble It!

This item has 7 comments

  1. Daryn says:

    "Their response to Brüno is natural and appropriate. It's satire without a target.... the way he provokes them into action makes HIM the idiot, not them. In legal terms, it's entrapment."

    To be fair, Borat also has a large amount of that as well, including:

    Norat going to a fancy, etiquette dinner and offering the hostess his poop in a bag, badly insulting the ladies, and inviting an alarmingly sleezy prostitute.

    Borat meeting with feminists and insisting that woman, scientifically, have brains the size of walnuts.

    Borat masturbating in public.

    Borat running naked through a hotel and convention, while also screaming and fighting with another fully nude man.

    In all of those cases (and perhaps a couple of others), I felt the people in "Borat" were provoked into action that was reasonably natural and appropriate.

  2. Greg says:

    Boycott Bruno.

  3. Hans says:

    I didn't take Greg's advice and saw this last night. It didn't seem quite as fresh as "Borat", but it was still pretty fantastic. It's one of the funniest movies I've seen in a long time... And yes, there were images I never wanted to see, and which I'll now never be able to get out of my head.

  4. Rob D. says:

    I agree with Eric that the satire was missing. I also thought Bruno would target homophobic people and let them make a fool of themselves. Some of the people in the movie might have been homophobic.......but they were put in a situation that would have got a similar reaction from the most open minded people. I also thought too much of the "reality scenes" felt scripted. I mean, does Richard Bey even have a show anymore? Was he at least in on the joke? I hope the audience wasn't acting......but I think that scene would have been tough to pull off and fool everyone. It left me wondering and confused if what I was watching was real. With all that beings said, the movie was still really funny! It's definitely worth watching.....even with it's flaws. It doesn't compare to Borat but it will still be funnier than most of the other comedies this summer.

  5. matt says:

    So what would make it a boycott, exactly? You not seeing the movie for some kind of political reason rather than not seeing it because you're not interested?

    From now on every time I pass on a movie because it looks dumb I'll say it's a boycott so that I'm being Important and Influential, and not because I just don't want to waste my money.

  6. Greg says:

    I just don't care for this ambush comedy style.

  7. adam says:

    this movie was painfully boring. had some funny moments, but not enough.

Add your comment:

The following HTML elements are allowed: <span class="spoiler">content</span>, <strong>, <em>, <a>, and <img>.

Before posting, please read the rules.


Subscription Center

Eric D. Snider's "Snide Remarks"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly humor column, "Snide Remarks." For more information, go here.

Subscribe

Eric D. Snider's "In the Dark"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly movie-review e-zine. For more information on it, go here.

Subscribe
 
Come read about baseball and web development at www.jeffjsnider.com