Eric D. Snider

Horton Hears a Who!

Movie Review

"Horton Hears a Who!"

Review by Eric D. Snider

Grade: A-

Rating: G

Released: Friday, March 14, 2008

Directed by:

Cast:

Yes! At last! This is how you make a good Jim Carrey comedy -- by leaving his forced physical mania behind and including only his voice! "Horton Hears a Who!" succeeds where previous Dr. Seuss adaptations have fallen short, most notably by using animation -- fluid, elastic, genuinely Seussian animation -- to tell the story. Carrey's shtick has always felt cartoonish anyway; now that he's playing a cartoon, it actually fits.

How the idea of reinventing Seuss' delightful drawings as cartoons failed to escape the makers of "How the Grinch Stole Christmas" and "The Cat in the Hat," I don't know. Carrey's performance as the Grinch was very good -- I guess hiding him under a ton of makeup and costumery works as well as removing his physical presence altogether -- but the movie itself was uninspired. And the less said about Mike Myers' live-action desecration of the Cat in the Hat, the better.

No, Dr. Seuss' stories should be cartoons, and they should be as pleasantly energetic and funny as this one, directed by Pixar veteran Jimmy Hayward and newcomer Steve Martino, from a script by Ken Daurio and Cinco Paul (a duo whose previous efforts, "Bubble Boy" and "College Road Trip," would not have inspired much confidence). Here the good doctor's gently whimsical, subtly insane vision is preserved, as is the story. Only the Whoville scenes have been beefed up (there was almost no backstory in the original) -- and even there, the rhyming narration, read by newsman Charles Osgood, is written in such a convincingly imitative style that I had to double-check that it wasn't actually from the book.

Carrey is the voice of Horton, the childlike elephant who hears a tiny cry for help come from a speck of dust floating by one day in the jungle. Horton is imaginative and playful, and not a little naive (Carrey's tapping into his inner Canadian, I think) as he tries to convince everyone else in the jungle that he's not imagining things. There really are tiny people on this speck, and it really does need protecting!

On the speck itself, Steve Carell provides the voice of the Mayor, a befuddled family man rendered useless by a powerful city council that is staunchly opposed to bad news. When the Mayor tries to warn his people that their world is spinning out of control and may soon be destroyed, he is ignored or derided. When he tries to convince them that a giant invisible elephant that he's been talking to is trying to save them, he is laughed off as a false prophet.

Seuss' original didn't indicate that the Mayor had any trouble convincing his fellow Whos of Horton's existence, but the revision fits Seuss' style. The story already lends itself to numerous interpretations -- the "a person's a person no matter how small" theme has already been co-opted by the anti-abortion crowd -- so why not add another dimension? Part of what makes "Horton" timeless is that it can be read either as a parable with a variety of possible messages, or as nothing more than a fun story.

Back in Horton's world, his chief opponent is the Kangaroo, a judgmental snob who "pouch-schools" her son and single-handedly enforces the jungle community's anti-imagination standards. ("If you can't see, hear, or feel something, it doesn't exist!" she says, the exact opposite of what you'd expect a right-wing home-schooler to believe.) Voiced by Carol Burnett -- Carol Burnett, ladies and gentlemen! -- the Kangaroo is a marvelously imperious antagonist, and she's joined in the story's unforced merriment by a mean Russian buzzard (Will Arnett), a bunch of banana-crazed monkeys, and several other bizarre creatures.

The addition of Horton's mouse pal, Morton (Seth Rogen), is unnecessary, and the inclusion of an REO Speedwagon musical number, while funny, is strangely out-of-place. Yet other changes, like the Mayor's devoted wife (Amy Poehler) and 96 daughters, blend as seamlessly with the Seussian worldview as if they'd been there from the start. Surely Dr. Seuss himself would approve of this lightheartedly wacky interpretation of his work. Let's hope other filmmakers use this as an example and get future adaptations right, too.

Grade: A-

Rated G, nothing more objectionable than a single poop reference

1 hr., 25 min.

This item has 10 comments

  1. Chocolatestu says:

    THANK YOU!!! I've been waiting for this review! I'm so glad that it's got an A-, I had high hopes! I love Dr. Seuss.

  2. Jenn says:

    I really liked this one too, & even saw it without my usual excuse of taking my nephews! It was a fun movie to watch & didn't screw up Seuss, which is a sacrilege as far as I'm concerned!!!

  3. Clumpy says:

    This might seem strange, but my fears were gone as soon as I saw the quality of animation in the trailer. Nobody who gave a care would have gone to that detail. In other words, somebody besides the usual Disney tools had to be behind it.

    Lassiter, in charge of animation? Pah - make him Disney CEO, with Brad Bird in charge of animation.

  4. Christina D says:

    I went and saw this movie anyway on Saturday evening, because I couldn't stand waiting for your review. :D I agree with your analysis, but I have to say I was disappointed that it wasn't funnier... I laughed a fair amount of times, but not as much as I was hoping to. Some of the jokes kind of fell flat with me, or were too obvious. However, it was cute overall and Jim Carrey wasn't overwhelming, like he is sometimes.

    And then there was the hyena sitting across the theater from my husband and I, who howled at everything. At first we were sitting right in front of her, but when she started laughing in a loud and annoying way, and commenting loudly during the preview for Kung-Fu Panda, we moved as far away from her as possible. But we could still hear her during the whole movie, because she laughed very loudly and annoyingly at EVERYTHING. I hate people like that.

    Beside that though, the movie was good!

  5. Melissa says:

    I kept waiting for the review to mention the crazy Anime sequence - that really set the tone of the movie for me...that and the crazy yellow fuzzy animal thing...

  6. Wanda Sue says:

    Melissa, that fuzzy yellow thing cracked me up too! She reminded me of my little sister.

  7. Kalyn says:

    Horton hears a who was a great moviee.like one of my favorite movie this year so far.I cant wait til it comes out on dvd.Because its a great childrens movie,and great for anybody to watch reallyy.Well i just wanted to sayy,i could go see it like 10 more times and still not be tired of watching it.

  8. Alice G. says:

    I found the movie charming and well done, other than the snide reference to "pouch-schooling" by the dogmatic kangaroo. It seems this reviewer has no problem taking pleasure in the slight, and adding one of his own about "right-wing homeschoolers" just to drive the point home. Since when have parents who school their kids at home become targets for attack by liberal entertainment media types? Too bad Dreamworks chose to reveal a predjudice against homeschooling families and portray them as being unwilling captives at home, shut away from society and learning about the world. This predjudice reveals great ignorance of how well-adjusted and successful homeschooled students are, as opposed to their public school counterparts who are failing to even graduate high school more than 30% of the time.

  9. Eric D. Snider says:

    The film also provides an opportunity for home-schooling parents to remind us how dour and humorless they can be.

  10. Wanda Sue says:

    LOL Eric!

Add your comment:

The following HTML elements are allowed: <strong>, <em>, <a>, and <img>.

Before posting, please read the rules.

 
Come read about baseball and web development at www.jeffjsnider.com