Eric D. Snider

Inglourious Basterds

Movie Review

"Inglourious Basterds"

Review by Eric D. Snider

Grade: B+

Rating: R

Released: Friday, August 21, 2009

Directed by:

Cast:

Though his imitators' films must number in the hundreds by now, Quentin Tarantino himself has made only seven features, and the latest, "Inglourious Basterds," demonstrates what should be an obvious truth: No one does Tarantino better than Tarantino.

The gleefully hip dialogue that gushes from his brain is still a pleasure to hear -- good thing, since it still gushes in 150-minute torrents. The only reason it doesn't seem as fresh as, say, "Reservoir Dogs" and "Pulp Fiction" is that, well, it isn't: "Basterds" has the disadvantage of not being Tarantino's first movie. But the things you sign on for in a QT work -- lengthy monologues, maiming, mutilation, cinephilia, and foot fetishism -- are here in spades.

The title, misspelled in the style of the hillbilly character who coins it (and bearing no relation to the similarly titled 1978 film), refers to a group of U.S. Army soldiers who have made it their business to slaughter as many Nazis as they can while World War II rages in Europe. The eight original members of the squad are Jewish, making them personally invested. One of the later additions, Stiglitz (Til Schweiger), is German, recruited by the Basterds after he singlehandedly killed 13 of his fellow S.S. officers. The Inglourious Basterds admire that kind of spirit!

Their leader, Tennessee-born Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt), who bears a scar on his neck that suggests he may have been on the wrong end of a noose at some point, pursues killing Nazis ("Nat-sees") with the enthusiasm of a kid in a sandbox. One of his favorite pastimes is to have Sgt. Donny Donowitz (Eli Roth), aka the Bear Jew, deploy a baseball bat against a Nazi's skull while the other Basterds observe. "Watchin' Donny beat Nat-sees to death is the closest we ever come to goin' to the movies!" he declares.

The Basterds have successfully struck terror in the hearts of the Germans, with even Hitler himself (Martin Wuttke) eager to meet the Nazi officer who survived one of their attacks. (If they let you live, it's only so you'll serve as a warning to others. No one escapes from the Inglourious Basterds.) But the Nazis have their own fearsome weapon, too, in the form of Col. Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz), better known as the Jew Hunter.

Let me tell you about Col. Landa the Jew Hunter, and about Christoph Waltz, the Austrian actor who plays him. Landa is Tarantino's greatest character since Samuel L. Jackson Jheri-curled his hair and yelled made-up Bible verses at deadbeats. He is terrifyingly pleasant as he asks a French dairy farmer questions about a missing Jewish family, who we know are hiding beneath the floorboards. Waltz plays the Jew Hunter to the hilt: funny, lighthearted, then frightening; serious and businesslike, then pulling out a comically oversized pipe to smoke. But Waltz is never campy -- Col. Landa is larger than life but still lifelike, thoroughly captivating to watch every time he's on the screen.

The Basterds and the Jew Hunter disappear for a while as the film moves to another subject, setting up for a convergence in the last act. In this other story, a beautiful young French Jew named Shosanna (Melanie Laurent) has escaped the Nazis, changed her name to Emmanuelle, and now operates a movie theater in occupied Paris. A Nazi soldier, Fredrick Zoller (Daniel Bruhl), takes a liking to her. Young and handsome, he's a war hero ("the German Sgt. York") and the subject of a rousing new Nazi propaganda film, "Nation's Pride," in which he plays himself. Because of his affection for Emmanuelle, he lobbies for the gala "Nation's Pride" premiere to be held at her theater. All the major Nazi leaders will be in attendance, maybe even the Fuhrer himself. All those Nazis in one place at one time, and all that anger in the heart of the proprietress....

In typical Tarantino fashion, there are juicy cameos (Mike Myers as a British military strategist?) and major characters not introduced until late in the game, like British Lt. Hicox (Michael Fassbender) and German film-star-turned-traitor Bridget von Hammersmark (Diane Kruger). Lesser members of the Basterds team, including B.J. Novak from "The Office," emerge in beefier roles as the multi-angled story builds toward its outrageous and insane climax.

Though Tarantino's visual and verbal styles are his trademarks, his very best work is really all about story, not flair. The most entertaining aspect of "Inglourious Basterds," as in "Pulp Fiction" and most of the others, is seeing what happens next. How it happens, and what the characters say while it happens, are less important -- stylistic icing on the story cake. (Mmm... story cake....) And in this case, the story is wildly, daringly imaginative, the sort of thing that very few filmmakers could even conceive, let alone execute.

But apart from Col. Landa the Jew Hunter, none of the personalities in "Basterds" stand out as great characters -- no, not even Lt. Aldo Raine. Brad Pitt is energetic and funny as the revenge-minded hillbilly, but it's a one-note character, like a minor figure in a Coen brothers movie. Donny the Bear Jew has his moment in the sun and then fades from the film; most of the others come and go and do their business capably but not very memorably.

This is what prevents the movie from achieving true greatness. It's loads of fun, to be sure, and certain sequences are as brilliantly enjoyable as anything Tarantino's ever done. But who, in the end, are we meant to care about? We're dying to see where the story will go, yes. Seeing where the characters wind up? Not so much.

Grade: B+

Rated R, pervasive harsh profanity, a lot of very graphic violence, very brief strong sexuality

2 hrs., 33 min.

Digg! Stumble It!

This item has 10 comments

  1. Marty says:

    Caught the matinee today and absolutely loved. It's about as much fun as you can have with 60 strangers surrounding you. Though it's long, it moves very rapidly. I couldn't believe the time when I looked at my phone leaving the theater. I, unlike Eric, took personal interest in what happened to Aldo Raine, although that may simply be due to the fact he's played by Brad Pitt, and he was incredibly witty. Tarantino fans will love it, but it's not for the faint of heart.

  2. Rob D. says:

    I agree 100 percent about Christoph Waltz. He totally made the movie and every scene he was in was a delight. QT gave him great material and he reminded me of Daniel Day Lewis in "There Will Be Blood". QT's best character is still Ordell Robbie from Jackie Brown but Jules is a close second. I guess we can put Col. Landa third.

  3. Jenn says:

    Caught this tonight, & I agree with everything Eric said. I really enjoyed this movie for the most part. I expected some blood & guts, because it is a movie about war, but pretty much abandoned my popcorn around the "Bear Jew" baseball bat part!! It does get pretty graphic, just as a warning! I didn't think it was going to be as witty as it was, as I've never really been a Tarentino fan. Christoph Waltz really stole the movie!

  4. Buckeye says:

    I saw this movie the other day and I like it even more now. I think it was more about language than any other Tarantino movie--specifically, about the manipulation and exploitation of language. Language serves as many characters' downfall. Some critics are missing this.

    It was also remarkable how the action was set in an alternative reality and the events were drawn out to a logical conclusion in that reality.

  5. Peter says:

    I also liked this movie. QT is a genius. Although, if you're going to make a revenge fantasy, couldn't the fantasy all be in english? I find that there is nothing more frustrating than having Tarantino's lush and snappy dialog constantly interrupted by characters translating it to other characters or by me reading the subtitles, after the comedic or dramatic timing of the line has passed. I'm going to see it again and try to get past this.

  6. milkshaken says:

    After a very promising start (super-polite Landa on the dairy farm!!) the unrelenting and cheerful sadism of the good guys and the alternative history ending made it less than enjoyable for me.

    I understand that Tarantino is a twisted creep who likes to see his characters tormented in the most lurid ways imaginable - and lace it with absurdly witty dialogues - but WWII was rather dreadful time to live through.(My parents grew up during Nazi occupation of Eastern Europe - marching HJ bands with flutes and drums, in shorts and white socks are forever in their memory, more terrifying than the SS, night arrests and mass executions). Even a Jewish revenge commando is not supposed to have that much fun in WWII...

  7. Rob D. says:

    I actually think all of the different languages were great Peter. I guess he could have made it all in English since it was a crazy fantasy but it wouldn't have been as good. Landa's character being such a great linguist is what made this movie different than the others. It separated him from other cool villains. Just watch it again and you won't have to read the subtitles as much.

  8. Russ says:

    I'm going to break from the mold and say that it was OKAY.

    I didn't really enjoy the over the top characters and plot as much as the rest of you. Especially Aldo Raine. Sorry, but that's not a Southern accent. Especially not the one some skinny, pasty white guy with a tiny mustache would have.

    Overall the unrealistic characters and the massive, massive plot holes detracted from my enjoyment of the film.

    -

    I'm not saying that it should have been just like real life. I'm saying it would have been nice if the characters had be CONSISTENT, if they'd reacted within the rules that the movie had set up for them, rather than random, thoughtless actions.

    -

    Of course it was an "artistic" movie, designed to be cinematical, not realistic. I don't feel those categories are mutually exclusive though.

    It's taking the easy way out to make it THAT nonsensical, imo.

  9. Eric D. Dixon says:

    milkshaken:
    The moral underpinnings of this movie were a lot more complicated and layered than I think you realize:

    http://www.reason.com/news/show/135691.html

  10. A Trainee says:

    Sorry, but I think everyone kind of missed the boat on understanding this film. If anyone is genuinely interested in developing a better understanding of it, and doesn't mind a long and difficult (but rewarding!) read, you might want to try here:
    http://burthurts.blogspot.com/2009/08/quentin-tarentinos-exceptional-states.html

    Yes, it's a tough blurb to read itself, but it really helps in reading the film. Good luck!

Add your comment:

The following HTML elements are allowed: <span class="spoiler">content</span>, <strong>, <em>, <a>, and <img>.

Before posting, please read the rules.


Subscription Center

Eric D. Snider's "Snide Remarks"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly humor column, "Snide Remarks." For more information, go here.

Subscribe

Eric D. Snider's "In the Dark"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly movie-review e-zine. For more information on it, go here.

Subscribe
 
Come read about baseball and web development at www.jeffjsnider.com