Mission: Impossible -- Ghost Protocol
Movie Review
"Mission: Impossible -- Ghost Protocol"
Review by Eric D. Snider
Grade: B+
Rating: PG-13
Released: Friday, December 16, 2011
Directed by:
Cast:
For a director to make the switch from animation to live-action is no small task, but nobody should be too surprised that Brad Bird's first flesh-and-blood effort has the best action sequences, hands down, of any movie this year. Have you seen "The Iron Giant," "Ratatouille," and "The Incredibles"? Those films, with their smooth, masterful action scenes, might as well have been storyboards for "Mission: Impossible -- Ghost Protocol."
In fact, animation might be the best training of all for this kind of movie. A cartoon has to be meticulously planned and carefully laid out, especially when it comes to busy scenes with a lot of characters and movement. You can't just slap it together. Many live-action directors cheat by using choppy editing to cover their mistakes or create artificial excitement, but someone who has overseen cartoons will have the patience and discipline to do it right. Or at least that's my theory at the moment. We'll see what happens when Bird's Pixar cohort Andrew Stanton ("Finding Nemo") makes the same leap with "John Carter" next year.
At any rate, "Ghost Protocol" may lack an interesting villain, but it has just about everything else you could possibly want in a high-tech spy caper. It begins with IMF agent Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) getting busted out of a Russian prison, moves quickly to a mission to prevent nuclear launch codes from falling into the hands of a madman, and after that barely pauses to catch its breath before people are dangling from skyscrapers and leaping out of trains. Yet instead of feeling chaotic and exhausting, as movies that seem to feature nonstop action often do, this one is breezy and invigorating, the action fluid and logical. Not to pick on the "Transformers" movies, but the incoherent action in them is a big part of why they're terrible. Brad Bird lays everything out perfectly, ably assisted by editor Paul Hirsch and cinematographer Robert Elswit, who won Oscars for their respective work on "The Empire Strikes Back" and "There Will Be Blood."
Ethan's partners this time are Benji (Simon Pegg), his old I.T. buddy who has graduated to field agent, and Jane (Paula Patton), whom Ethan has not worked with before. Jane is a skilled agent but is currently hot under the collar because of what happened in a botched mission involving fellow agent Hanaway (Josh Holloway) and devious French assassin Sabine Moreau (Lea Seydoux). The fourth member of their team -- and this chapter is all about the importance of teamwork -- is Brandt (Jeremy Renner), a pencil-pushing assistant to the IMF Secretary (Tom Wilkinson) who's dragged into the middle of the action.
The screenplay, by "Alias" writers Josh Appelbaum and Andre Nemec, is marked by dialogue that's more efficient than memorable -- functional, rather than clever -- and a story that's twisty enough to be "Mission: Impossible" without being impossible to follow. The stakes are clearly delineated, and we know what the objectives are. None of it is remarkable, though it's always nice to see the old classics played with enthusiasm and skill. (And I do wish the bad guy had more to him than this one does.) The real meat is in the execution of the stunts, and the way they're seamlessly integrated with the scenes in between. Bird doesn't do anything just because it looks cool. He does things that make sense within the story, and that look cool.
Everyone's going to be talking about the sequence set at the world's tallest building in Dubai. And with good reason: it's one of the most breathtakingly suspenseful and shrewdly crafted segments I've ever seen. You don't even need to be told that it was actually shot there, and that Cruise did most of his own stunts; you can tell by looking. More importantly, the sequence works not because it's BIG and HUGE -- it's not like they blow up the building, or outrun a tidal wave, or knock a bridge over -- but because it operates on simple principles and slows down enough to let us see, and thus care about, what's going on.
That's the movie in a nutshell: thrilling, charismatic, fun, and not too ludicrous. If Brad Bird chooses to accept the mission of making more live-action films as vigorously entertaining as this one, I'll never disavow him.
Grade: B+
Rated PG-13, moderate action violence, a little mild profanity
2 hrs., 13 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.



This item has 4 comments
December 16, 2011 at 11:53 pm
I was wondering if Eric would be able to give a good review to this movie. When I saw Brad Bird as the director I thought, "Surely it can't be the Pixar guy." IT IS! Hooray! I loved his Pixar work and I'm looking forward to seeing this movie now.
December 17, 2011 at 11:09 pm
If the marketing people really want me to see it they should have advertised the movie: "Mission Impossible 3... or is it 4: Directed by Brad Bird." I prefer to avoid Tom Cruise. I have no dedication to the Mission Impossible franchise? But Brad Bird? He has yet to really fail me.
December 18, 2011 at 3:54 pm
**** yea! I got immediately excited the moment the theme played the very first time I saw the trailer for this one, can't wait to see it!
Soooooooooo glad that it got a good review from you. I would have still considered it if it was awful, but it's a done deal with a B+.
MI 1 & 2 (especially 1, but I am struggling to remember which plot is which atm) are some of my favorite action movies. (Of course, they came out when I was at that age where young boys love every action movie they see, but still.)
It's refreshing to see movies like this reversing the trend of bad follow-ups. Speaking of which, did everyone see that *Men In Black III* is coming out next May??? :D :D The trailer gave me CHILLS when I realized it wasn't fan-made.
December 20, 2011 at 10:04 am
I just saw it in IMAX last night. The villain is a definite let-down and the characters sort of lack any kind of emotional resonance with the possible exception of Benji who's always good for a laugh). Pretty awesome movie though. The 2nd act (Dubai) was incredible. The 3rd act was a bit of a let down after that. Overall impression: better than I and III; far far better than the MI:2 POC.
For all the Tom Cruise haters, yes he's a nut, but at least he's not a nut in a hateful way (Mel Gibson) or in a destructive way (most of the rest of Hollywood). Give the guy a break.