Eric D. Snider

RockNRolla

Movie Review

"RockNRolla"

Review by Eric D. Snider

Grade: C+

Rating: R

Released: Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Directed by:

Cast:

You'd think that being married to Madonna, Guy Ritchie would have picked up on the value of occasionally reinventing oneself. But no, he keeps making the same movie, the same ultra-cool exercises in British gangster violence and stylish criminal shenanigans, and "RockNRolla" is the latest entry. Then again, the one time he did try something different, the result was "Swept Away," so maybe he's wise to stay in his comfort zone.

At any rate, "RockNRolla" inspires strong feelings of "meh" in me. It's not nearly as clever, funny, or stylish as "Snatch" or "Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels," though the accents are a lot less indecipherable this time around, so that's nice. It's also not as good as "Gangster No. 1" or "Sexy Beast" or many of the other gritty British gangster capers that have come around in the last several years. It feels like a rerun -- which isn't necessarily a bad thing, after all. People watch reruns all the time.

Our narrator is Archie (Mark Strong), who works as the calm, suave right-hand man to Lenny (Tom Wilkinson), the most powerful money-lender and underworld boss in London. Half the city's councilors, judges, and cops are in Lenny's pocket, and he has leveraged this influence into a massive fortune in real estate.

Lenny is not a figure to be messed with, but the Russians don't know that. A new mover and shaker named Uri (Karel Roden) has come to town to strike a deal with Lenny -- it involves paying Lenny to bribe city officials to get a construction project underway -- and he's a formidable figure himself. Lenny is old school; Uri is dangerously modern.

Tangled in this web is an assortment of unsavory characters (all characters in a Guy Ritchie movie are unsavory): Stella (Thandie Newton), a crooked accountant; a crew of robbers and thieves called the Wild Bunch, which includes One Two (Gerard Butler), Mumbles (Idris Elba), and possibly-gay Handsome Bob (Tom Hardy); and a junkie rock star named Johnny Quid (Toby Kebbell), who recently fell off a yacht and is presumed dead. Oh, and Johnny Quid's managers, played by Jeremy Piven and Ludacris. Oh, and a priceless painting. Oh, and a guy called Tank who does business out of an SUV and can find out anything you need to know.

It's amusing enough to see all these low-lifes steal from and double-cross one another, but Ritchie's usual bag of cinematic tricks (slow-mos, freeze-frames, flashbacks, etc.) isn't sufficient to breathe new life into this old formula. Most of the characters are just mildly colorful -- only Tom Wilkinson's wily old snake Lenny stands out as a truly memorable creation. It takes a consummate professional like Wilkinson to make Ritchie's well-worn paths seem fresh again; the rest of the cast, game though they may be, are just along for the ride.

I heard a lot of hatred expressed for this film when it premiered at the Toronto Film Festival last month, and that perplexes me. It doesn't strike me as the type of film that warrants any passionate feelings one way or the other. It's kind of fun but kind of repetitive; kind of stylish but kind of derivative. What's to hate? On the other hand, what's to love? It'll be a good movie for HBO, where it can be aired repeatedly and you can amuse yourself by watching 15-minute chunks of it here and there.

Grade: C+

Rated R, a lot of harsh profanity, a lot of violence

1 hr., 53 min.

Digg! Stumble It!

This item has 5 comments

  1. Chad Rehak says:

    You are a moron. Not only was this movie intelligent and one of Guy Ritchie's best works, but this was easily an A. It had everything you would want and expect from a Guy Ritchie film and being a consumer this is what you look for when you go to see movies like Snatch and RockNRolla and now Sherlock Holmes. This is what Guy RItchie does, this is his style and you being an avid "movie critic." (note the quotations) you should know that better then anyone.

  2. Rob D. says:

    I actually thought Eric was too nice giving this movie a C+. I'm not a big Guy Ritchie fan and I hate when people compare him to Tarantino who is a genius. Chad Rehak: Just because this fit Guy Ritchie's style doesn't mean that it's a good movie or as good as his others. Eric knows this is what Guy Ritchie does.......he just didn't like it as much as Snatch and Lock Stock.

  3. Chad Rehak says:

    Well Rob D... Even though I truly appreciate the fact that you can [OBSCENE EUPHEMISM] and type a rebuttal to me at the same time; impresses me but this is clearly all opinion-based. Because your well thought out response and shows me you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Guy Ritchie is one of the most influential directors of our generation, not sure how old you are. I'm very disappointed in not only your response but your outlook on life if the director that you aimed towards right away was Tarantino. I'd never take anything away from the guy, but when you go see a Tarantino movie, you pay for the Tarantino experience. The same exact thing you do for a Guy Ritchie film, and if you think that Rocknrolla didn't have every element in a Guy Ritchie film than I truly feel sorry that you don't know his directing style. But please think before you respond to this because you just [DIFFERENT BUT RELATED OBSCENE EUPHEMISM] makes you look like a unintelligent person.

  4. Rob D. says:

    Actually Chad, I still stand by the fact that Eric knows all about Guy Ritchie and what is to be expected in his films. He has seen all of those movies you mentioned and he definitely compares and contrasts. I don't always agree with Eric but he is very smart and not even close to a moron. I'm not saying that RockNRolla didn't have Guy Ritchie elements that you would expect and notice. I'm just saying that those elements alone doesn't make it a great movie. In fact, most critics would agree that this movie was just decent.

  5. Claude King says:

    "when you go see a Tarantino movie, you pay for the Tarantino experience. The same exact thing you do for a Guy Ritchie film, and if you think that Rocknrolla didn't have every element in a Guy Ritchie film than I truly feel sorry that you don't know his directing style."

    that was easily the best argument made here...

Add your comment:

The following HTML elements are allowed: <span class="spoiler">content</span>, <strong>, <em>, <a>, and <img>.

Before posting, please read the rules.


Subscription Center

Eric D. Snider's "Snide Remarks"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly humor column, "Snide Remarks." For more information, go here.

Subscribe

Eric D. Snider's "In the Dark"

This is to join the mailing list for Eric's weekly movie-review e-zine. For more information on it, go here.

Subscribe
 
Visit Jeff J. Snider's website