Shut up & Sing (documentary)
Movie Review
"Shut up & Sing (documentary)"
Review by Eric D. Snider
Grade: B+
Rating: R
Released: Friday, October 27, 2006
Directed by:
Cast:
All Natalie Maines said was that she was embarrassed George W. Bush was from the same state she was. For that she and her band, the Dixie Chicks, were pilloried and vilified. Bill O'Reilly said "they deserve to be slapped around." Pat Robertson called them "the dumbest bimbos." People burned their CDs. They got death threats. All this for expressing disapproval of the president?
Of course, as the fine new documentary "Shut Up & Sing" demonstrates, "We're ashamed the president of the United States is from Texas" implies so much more than mere disapproval of Bush. Maines said it at a concert in London, and while it's one thing to criticize the president here, it's something else to do it on foreign soil. Don't air your dirty laundry in front of the neighbors, you know? Furthermore, this was in March 2003, days before America invaded Iraq, when patriotism was running high and Bush's approval rating was soaring. It wasn't just that a lot of people liked Bush. It was that a lot of people ADORED him. How could anyone possibly think otherwise?!
"Shut Up & Sing" cuts back and forth between 2003 and 2005/2006. It is ironic and amusing to see how much things have changed since Maines' fateful declaration and its aftermath. Bush's approval ratings are in the toilet now, with ever-larger percentages of Americans believing the war in Iraq was a mistake and that it has been badly handled. If Maines were to say now what she said then, no one would bat an eye.
But at the time -- heavens, what a crapstorm! The Dixie Chicks -- frontwoman Maines, Emily Robison and her sister Martie Maguire -- were the best-selling female group EVER. They had millions of followers, but not much crossover success. They were a country group, and most of their fans were country fans. And most country fans are conservative Republicans. For the Chicks to speak out against Bush and the war in Iraq was a slap in the face to much of their constituency.
Country radio stations stopped playing them. The ones that didn't suffered boycotts by listeners. The filmmakers, Barbara Kopple and Cecilia Peck, were following the Chicks at the time and have footage of the infamous statement itself, as well as the behind-the-scenes discussions that followed. The sponsor of the group's international tour, Lipton Tea, threatens to pull out. The girls are increasingly perplexed and amazed that something as simple as not liking President Bush could inspire such a strong reaction.
Kopple and Peck include scenes with Dixie Chicks fans and ex-fans, too, to give us a sense of what the mood was at the time. "If you're supporting the Dixie Chicks, you're supporting communism," says one passionate ex-fan in a statement that, no matter how many different ways I think about it, never makes any sense.
All of this is fascinating to watch, partly to see how much things have changed in the interim, partly to witness the delicate inner workings of the three-woman band. Maines was the one who made the offensive remark, but the Dixie Chicks as a group are punished. How do Robison and Maguire feel about suffering for Maines' sins? Do they even agree with her? How do they get back on track afterward?
Somewhat less interesting are the scenes set in 2005, with the group working on a new album. To be frank, the material dealing specifically with the Dixie Chicks as a musical act is probably intriguing only to Dixie Chicks fans. It's when the focus is on the controversy, on how everything is political these days, that the movie feels fresh and alive.
The Chicks returned from their international tour wondering how the reception would be in their homeland. Their first U.S. date after the brouhaha was in Greenville, S.C., where a statue of Strom Thurmond sits proudly in the center of town. Hilarious paradoxes like that -- liberal singers in a conservative genre, concerts by pariahs being held in a city where a statue honors one of the nation's most notorious racists -- are what make "Shut Up & Sing" a remarkably entertaining look at politics in the 21st century. America is a crazy place, and we love it. The Dixie Chicks do, too.
Grade: B+
Rated R, a lot of harsh profanity, some sexual references
1 hr., 33 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.



This item has 5 comments
December 1, 2006 at 2:41 pm
I just wanted to publicly say that the Dixie Chicks are dead to me. Not that I cared much about them before.
Peace out!
December 2, 2006 at 1:08 pm
FWIW, I think a lot of people were more turned off by how they reacted to the criticism, rather than the initial comment. I mean, if folks don't want to listen to music made by people with whom they disagree, that's their right, even if it seems a little silly to me. But to say that those folks don't believe in free speech or are censoring the Chicks, that's more silly. Sillier? more sillier? Whatever.
December 2, 2006 at 9:03 pm
You should hear their new album; a complete watershed project for them. The controversy infuses every song, either explicitly or implicitly. To be honest, it's their best album ever, as well as their most personal. And it is censoring to refuse to play their music on the radio because of politics, not content of the songs, and when their lives or safety are threatened because of their political beliefs, it's not all that silly. The title of the film comes from a death threat letter they recieved, that told them to shut up and sing or they would be killed.
December 2, 2006 at 10:10 pm
"And it is censoring to refuse to play their music on the radio because of politics, not content of the songs..."
I'm pretty sure that refusing to play their songs because of their content would technically fit the bill of "censorship" more than refusing to play their songs because the vast majority of your listening audience doesn't want to hear them.
That said, yes, it is ridiculous that anyone would threaten someone's life because of a harmless political opinion. That said, the Dixie Chicks made millions off a song about killing some guy named Earl, so they should have had some clue that the people who listen to their music are fans of the redneck violence.
I don't understand why anyone in the world cares more about what the Dixie Chicks or Tim Robbins or Curt Schilling think; does fame really automatically qualify them for intelligent political discourse? If you like what they have to say because it is intelligent, great; if you like what they have to say because they sing good songs or make good movies or play good sports, you're a moron.
I outgrew the Dixie Chicks, but it had nothing to do with politics. I outgrew Toby Keith, too.
January 3, 2007 at 3:01 am
Anyone who doesn't understand that this was indeed a First Amendment issue involving free speech should see this movie, if only for the scene in which Senator John McCain corners some little weasel boy of a radio executive who says that the disc jockies operate autonomously; while having only earlier admitted that the word went forth from corporate to dump the Dixie Chicks' music. If the people who have supported this bloody fiasco in Iraq really believed their own BS, they'd understand that the right to disagree with the president is a fundamental right of being an American, and the right of anyone in democracy. Senator McCain, while a believer in the war, understood that and does. Beyond that, this movie shows that the Dixie Chicks is one of the most talented groups performing what we used to call "country rock" in the world. I just kept thinking about how far they'd taken the roots started by bands such as the Byrds (back when Roger McGuinn took them into the "Sweetheart of the Rodeo" era) and people such as Gram Parsons. I want the Dixie Chicks to do a cover of "Drug Store Truck Drivin' Man" on an upcoming album. This is an outstanding movie.