Even without having read the fantasy novel on which "The Golden Compass" is based, I can tell that the movie has drastically eliminated a lot of its material. The book presumably makes sense, whereas the movie is rushed and slapdash. I frequently had to ask myself, "What are the heroes trying to accomplish?" And I am a grown-up who watches movies for a living! I can only imagine how befuddled kids will be.
My but the special effects sure are fantastic, though! There are armored alcoholic polar bears galloping across the tundra, none of it real but all of it pretty darn convincing. There are smaller animals everywhere, all computer-generated and realistic (except, strangely, for a puppy -- for which they could have just used, you know, a real puppy). You can often be caught up in the magic of the movie and swept along with its story -- until you remember that, oh yeah, you don't really know what's going on.
Basically, it's like this. Lyra (Dakota Blue Richards) is a young orphan girl who lives in a parallel world where people's souls dwell not inside of them but in the form of animals that accompany them. They're called daemons (which is the archaic spelling of "demons"). Your daemon might be a dog, or a monkey, or a bird, or whatever. I guess you wouldn't have a fish for a daemon, because then you'd have to carry your soul around in a bowl. If you get hurt, your daemon feels it too, and vice versa.
Anyway, the rulers of this world have outlawed certain kinds of knowledge, including all talk of "dust," i.e., the magical kind that was once a way for humans to commune with other worlds. The Magisterium (as the ruling party is known) also got rid of all the golden compasses, which were also used to ... um ... learn ... stuff.
But there is still one golden compass, and Lyra is (probably) the long-prophesied girl who can read it! She gets whisked away by the tall, icily beautiful Mrs. Coulter (Nicole Kidman), who says she needs an apprentice on an expedition, but who's really in with the Magisterium. Lyra escapes her clutches and gets help from an American-style cowboy named Scoresby (Sam Elliott -- love him!) and an exiled polar bear named Iorek Byrnison (voice of Ian McKellen).
Help with what, you ask? Well, Lyra's uncle, Lord Asriel (Daniel Craig), has gone into the north country to try to make contact with another world, and Lyra wanted to go after him. I think. No, wait! Boogeymen called gobblers have been abducting children, and Lyra wants to find them because a couple of her friends were among those taken.
Also, there are witches.
The film was adapted and directed by Chris Weitz, who previously adapted and directed "About a Boy." You might think a task like this would be overwhelming, given his background, and I'd say you were right. Weitz has the narrative leaping around frantically, managing to set up some interesting sequences -- the polar bear fight is pretty thrilling -- but not much ongoing momentum.
Even with no prior knowledge of the story, you can tell where material has been removed or oversimplified. When Lyra first goes off with Mrs. Coulter to her fine house, about 10 seconds pass before Lyra is talking about how she's been there for "weeks," and there are all of these "rooms we're not allowed in." But that's the first we've heard of it. The film gives no indication that any time has passed -- and that's a movie-making mistake, not a story-structure one.
Contrary to the e-mail that was forwarded to you by the ladies at church, the film is not blatantly anti-religion or anti-God. There are certainly parallels that can be drawn between the iron-fisted Magisterium and, say, the Catholic Church -- especially since "magisterium" is a real word that means "the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church." But who knows that? The paranoid, free-will-crushing Magisterium reminded me more of the many fascist governments I've seen in other movies, and our heroes' attempts to fight against it are no more fraught with anti-religion symbolism than any other kids film about young people fighting authority (i.e., most kids films). It's certainly not going to make impressionable young viewers question their religious faith. They'll be too busy trying to figure out what's going on.
Grade: C+
Rated PG-13, some intense bear-on-bear violence
1 hr., 53 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.
This item has 9 comments
December 7, 2007 at 7:13 am
Question: I've been trying to determine the intensity of the PG-13 rating. I have two kids (6 & 7) who enjoyed Narnia and we've been wanting to take them to this all year as well. Atheism & story issues aside, any advice? Is it just for a polar bear fight?
December 7, 2007 at 11:11 am
GWGumby, you'll find a content review of this (and nearly every other) film at pluggedinonline.
http://www.pluggedinonline.com/movies/movies/a0003536.cfm
December 7, 2007 at 12:07 pm
Sorry about your daemon Eric, but at least your soul isn't a lump of coal.
December 7, 2007 at 2:29 pm
After reading your review, I think I've figured out what it was about the book that was so unsatisfying. There's no real motivation for any of the adult's choices. It's somehow rather hollow. I think it's there in the books, too, not just the movie. No significant motivation and no sense of responsibility.
December 7, 2007 at 7:56 pm
"I guess you wouldn't have a fish for a daemon, because then you'd have to carry your soul around in a bowl."
In the book it's explained that once a child reaches puberty, their daemon picks a permanent form to take on forever. One of the characters mentions one deciding to be a dolphin--the guy who had him could never leave the sea. He didn't like it much.
December 8, 2007 at 2:02 pm
Rated PG-13, some intense bear-on-bear violence
That sounds like the infomercials about Girls Gone Wild, only replace violence with action and . . . well, . . . never mind! I should stop writing now.
December 11, 2007 at 8:56 am
For the PG-13 rating, besides the bear on bear violence, a number of people are killed in the movie, and while no blood is shown, it's pretty obvious when they die, as you see their deamons turn into golden sparkles when anybody dies. Also, what happens to the children in Bolvanga is pretty horrifying, but again, no blood is spilled and there's no physical harm.
December 17, 2007 at 11:37 pm
You are completely right. The book had so much more meaning to it all. The movie raced through, leaving out important parts. It didn't show the depth of relationships between characters. But I must say that Nicole Kidman in this movie is very much how I imagined Mrs. Coulter in the book.
January 4, 2008 at 11:32 am
I thought the movie was entertaining, and I was able to follow it better than I expected after reading this review. I quite enjoyed it, except for the hideous song over the closing titles. That nearly spoiled my experience. It gets my vote for worst song ever.
P.S. I did find the daemons exploding and the "experiment" being performed on the kids rather disturbing, though.