The Karate Kid
Movie Review
"The Karate Kid"
Review by Eric D. Snider
Grade: B-
Rating: PG
Released: Friday, June 11, 2010
Directed by:
Cast:
Look, I don't want to be difficult here, but at no point in the new "Karate Kid" does anyone learn karate. It's kung fu. The characters call it kung fu. The film is set in China, which is where kung fu is practiced. Except for a brief instance of the kid watching some karate instruction on television, "The Karate Kid" contains no karate whatsoever.
I don't ask for a lot in life. The idea of remaking a beloved film doesn't offend me. I'm not one of those geeks who insist that remakes somehow retroactively destroy the originals. But if you're going to remake "The Karate Kid," it had DAMN WELL BETTER HAVE KARATE IN IT.
You would think this would be non-negotiable. You would think that if the screenplay replaced karate with kung fu, someone would say, "Oh, we'd better change the title to 'The Kung Fu Kid.'" And everyone would say, "Right, right, obviously." There wouldn't even be a discussion.
Yet somehow it went like this:
FIRST STUDIO EXECUTIVE: It's a remake of "The Karate Kid," but instead of a high school student learning karate from an old Japanese man in Southern California, it's a 12-year-old boy learning kung fu from an old Chinese man in Beijing!
SECOND STUDIO EXECUTIVE: Brilliant! What's it called?
FIRST STUDIO EXECUTIVE: "The Karate Kid"!
SECOND STUDIO EXECUTIVE: I see no flaws in this!
(Remove clothes; roll around naked in money; end scene.)
Apart from THAT, it's a pretty faithful remake of the 1984 favorite. The original writer, Robert Mark Kamen, gets story credit, and the screenplay (by newcomer Christopher Murphey) hits most of the same plot points, even approximates some of the dialogue. I guess if they'd called it "The Kung Fu Kid," people would have thought it was a rip-off of "The Karate Kid, rather than an authorized remake of it. Plus there's the name recognition. People are predisposed to liking a movie called "The Karate Kid." The fact that it DOESN'T HAVE ANY KARATE IN IT is beside the point.
Sorry. I'm trying to hold it together. Never mind the backstory. Let's pretend you never heard of the original "Karate Kid" and went into this one cold. How is the movie itself? Eh, fine. Its greatest asset is Jaden Smith, son of Will Smith, who seems to have inherited his dad's effortless charm and likability. He plays Dre Parker, a 12-year-old Detroit boy who's uprooted when his mother (Taraji P. Henson) is transferred by her company to Beijing. Dre is soon set upon by a bully his age, Cheng (Zhenwei Wang), whose kung fu instructor preaches the "no mercy" method of fighting. Moving to another country is bad enough. Now he has to get beaten up by a jerk whose language he doesn't even speak?
Along comes Mr. Han (Jackie Chan), the maintenance man at Dre's apartment building. He is reclusive and taciturn and not at all Jackie Chan-like. He knows kung fu, though, and he offers to train Dre so that he can face off against Cheng in an official venue, a junior tournament being held some weeks hence.
There are no surprises from that point forward if you've seen the original "Karate Kid," and probably even if you haven't. Dre learns lessons about life and kung fu, bonds with Mr. Han (no mention is ever made of Dre's absent father), and we all go home happy, if not exactly overwhelmed.
The film, directed by Harald Zwart ("The Pink Panther 2," "Agent Cody Banks"), was shot in China and makes some genuine effort to make the location part of the story, rather than just a Generic Exotic Backdrop. Most of the Chinese characters speak Mandarin, not English, adding to Dre's sense of alienation. Meiying (Wenwen Han), a sweet girl Dre's age, is driven by her austere parents to practice the violin constantly, suggesting the high expectations placed upon modern Chinese youth.
The only real problem with the film, other than its utter lack of karate, is its length: almost two and a half hours! Meiying, pleasant though she is, adds nothing to the main story, and a scene explaining Mr. Han's tragic past is maudlin and unconvincing. All of that should have been cut, and the whole movie tightened up, to prevent the rambling, lackadaisical tone it wound up with. If you must remake "The Karate Kid," and if you must do it without including any karate, the least you can do is get us in and out of there in two hours.
Grade: B-
Rated PG, a little mild profanity, a lot of martial-arts fighting
2 hrs., 20 min.
Copyright © Eric D. Snider.
This work may not be transmitted via the Internet, nor reproduced in any other way, without written consent from Eric D. Snider.



This item has 7 comments
June 11, 2010 at 2:18 am
So weird.
Here in Beijing during casting, production, etc., it was always referred to as Kung Fu Kid.
Always.
From the original casting email, dated March 26, 2009: "PRODUCTION: Kung Fu Kid – a Hollywood remake of classic movie The Karate Kid. "
From a news clip, July 30, 2009: "Jackie Chan will play the wise kung-fu master in a Hollywood-Chinese remake of the 1984 hit, The Karate Kid, that kicked off filming in the Chinese capital this weekend, a movie company publicist said Monday. Chan's young disciple in Kung Fu Kid will be played by Jaden Smith... China Film Group spokesman Weng Li told The Associated Press.”
Perhaps it was a last-minute test audience or marketing switch.
Or maybe it was a legal thing, since most of the plot beats are apparently true to the original?
June 11, 2010 at 7:25 am
I think they should've just stuck to the Kung Fu kid title. Most people who see the movie will get it and understand it is a remake that is being faithful to the original's basic plot but retelling in a different way and the fact that the kid is being taught Kung Fu justifies the title change. There have been remakes made where the title was different from the original. I guess they were anxious to cash in on the brand name and entice fans of the original who are now grownup parents that will bring their kids to the movie but that would've happened anyway.
It's interesting that Eric complains about a scene where Jackie Chan's character history is explained a bit. I haven't seen the movie yet but it sounds very similar to the scene in the original where Daniel finds Mr. Miyagi drunk. The studio execs actually wanted that scene cut because they felt it took too much time and slowed down the movie. But the scene worked because it was important in the development of the main character where he sees his mentor in a moment of weakness and realizes everyone has their inner demons and personal struggles and not just him. But I'll see the movie and judge for myself if this new scene works or not.
June 11, 2010 at 10:25 am
Eric, you're the man. This was the funniest review for a movie rated above "D+" that I've ever seen. Bravo!
June 12, 2010 at 3:44 am
Seasider,
That was also the scene that got Morita the Oscar nom. :0
June 22, 2010 at 10:58 am
The discrepency in the title is there, of course, but honestly, how could they name the movie anything else after the fantastic success of the original film?
It surprised me that they those to film it in China instead of Japan, but it looks like Kung Fu is currently the most popular and recognized form of martial arts besides Tae Kwon Do, especially after the recent movie Kung Fu Panda.
Aside from the title, I thought the movie was very well done. They stayed true to the spirit of the original while changing the plot just enough to make it new and interesting.
[SPOILER!] My favorite part at the end was when Jaden Smith explains to Jackie Chan why he has to finish the tournament: "I'm still scared. Whatever happens out there, I don't want to be scared anymore." A line that delved deep into the character's psyche and provided a perfect motivation for the last scene. I also loved it because it showed that the character cared more about conquering himself than beating up bullies.
June 28, 2010 at 12:17 am
What's the big deal about the name. Aren't we all ignorant Americans who can't tell the difference between different nationalities of Asians, let alone their specific disciplines of martial arts?
Karate, Kung Fu, same thing. Doesn't change the movie.
It makes more sense to me to keep the title.
June 30, 2010 at 6:34 am
Eric,
I enjoy your reviews very much. One correction to your review of this movie, though: You say that "no mention is ever made of Dre's absent father." In fact, at the very beginning of the movie, the camera shows the lines marked on the door frame identifying how tall Dre was at different points in time; the tallest line (before Dre adds his own) indicates the date on which Dre's dad died.
Keep up the good work!