Home Blog Page 72

I Feel Eric Move under My Feet

0

As the above headline so boldly proclaims, this week’s topic is, indeed, EARTHQUAKE SAFETY.

People who concern themselves primarily with weather (called “meteorologists,” or, sometimes, “dorks”) have informed those of us who are either interested or who have to write a column on the subject because they have been receiving threatening phone calls from their editors telling them to quit messing around because The Readers are getting sick of picking up the paper faithfully each and every week expecting to see earthquake safety but instead seeing some lunatic subject like “Presidents’ Day,” and — Oh, shoot. I seem to have gotten off track. I’ll have to start that one over.

All right, let’s try it again. Meteorologists have informed us that unlike other natural disasters (fires, hurricanes, Jimmy Carter, etc.), which are usually found during one particular time of the year, earthquakes are permitted in their contracts to strike wherever and whenever they please, thus earning them the distinction of being Nature’s Most Obnoxious Disaster.

It’s a good idea, then, to be prepared for “The Big One,” which, according to “seismologists” (Greek, meaning “people who study seismos”) will absolutely, positively occur sometime between now and a zillion years from next Thursday. With a major catastrophe looming in the near future like that, you should make sure you have plenty of food, or anything else relatively edible, in your house. This will be important if, after an earthquake, the Domino’s Pizza cars can’t get through.

Also, be sure to have a video camera on hand. What good is a natural disaster unless you can get some good shots of people falling down and/or being hit in personal areas by steel girders from nearby collapsing buildings? Who knows — maybe you’ll even get to meet Bob Saget!

Okay. Now that you’re fully prepared, we may as well have an earthquake. When one hits, you MUST:

1. Run around and scream as though your vital organs were being violently removed. This is important, as it makes the news footage look good.

2. Drive your car into what’s left of the lake. Nothing is more boring than an earthquake where no one is hurt and no damage is done. I take that back. “Charles in Charge” is more boring.

If you get the urge to protect yourself, try holding household pets over your head. Almost anything will do, but large dogs work the best. Yappy little dogs with names such as “Fifi” and “Boofy” are pretty much worthless, but I guess that goes without saying.

When the shaking stops, you are required BY LAW to say, “Wow. Was that an earthquake?” Everyone must then pretend that you are not an idiot for asking such a stupid question and reply, “I think so.” Of course, it will be obvious that an earthquake has occurred because any old people who may be present will be laying on the floor, mumbling incoherently to their dead spouses. But you must ask the question anyway.

The next step, once you’ve established that everything at your house is okay, is to turn on the TV to make sure that some damage WAS done somewhere, because, as I mentioned earlier, an earthquake without damages is like a rap concert without stabbing victims.

If the quake was a major one, perhaps you’ll be fortunate enough to see some “expert” opinions on television. I remember how after the San Francisco earthquake, before official results became available, the reporters spent a good half hour asking World Series fans — the same World Series fans who had compensated for the “One-Beer-at-a-Time” rule by getting good and drunk before they got to the stadium — how big THEY thought the quake was on the Sphinctor Scale.

I’m sorry. Richter Scale.

Anyway, so there were all these intoxicated baseball fans attempting to sound like they knew what they were talking about (or, at the very least, to sound coherent). One man placed the quake at five, another at eight, and yet another at 12. This last man was most drunk, and, I think, most amusing.

One interesting fact about earthquakes is that animals can predict them.

No, wait. That’s not interesting. Come to think of it, NONE of this is interesting. I don’t even know why I wrote it.

Advice for the Lovelorn

0

There are a couple of things that I’ve been wondering about lately. First, what should one do in case of an earthquake? Second, why is Valentine’s Day in the winter instead of the spring? I’ll cover both topics today.

I think Valentine’s Day should be in the spring because spring is, after all, the time of year when “a young man’s fancy turns to love,” while winter is when “a young man’s legs turn to ice because, in the interest of preserving his tan, he refuses to wear long pants.”

So Valentine’s Day should definitely be in April or May sometime. I would suggest April, since there aren’t any holidays there already, except for that Religious Holiday Whose Name You Can’t Mention in Public Schools Because It Implies Religious Preference, So We Just Call It “Spring Break.” I think everyone should write a letter to their friendly neighborhood congressperson and tell them that if Valentine’s Day doesn’t get moved immediately, they will begin finding dead animals in their mailboxes.

Now, some advice for all you misguided teenage boys who need some help on Valentine’s Day. This is, after all, the best time to try to acquire a girlfriend, because it is when girls are feeling the most romantic, agreeable, and, most importantly, desperate. The nearest male emotion to this Valentine’s Day sentimentalism is when a male can emit a belch of such a velocity that his car windows fog up.

It is a strange thing, though. Girls have some kind of gland — I believe it is the same gland that enables them to dance — that gives them the foolish notion that just because it’s Valentine’s Day, they should have someone (preferably a guy, though some women, such as Madonna, are less discriminating) to be lovey-dovey with. Fellas, this is the perfect time for you to move in. Now that I have ended two consecutive sentences with prepositions, I shall move on. Make that three sentences.

“But how do I go about asking a girl out?” I hear you cry, making it four sentences. Well, I happen to be an expert on the subject, having asked a girl to “go with me” when I was in the fifth grade. Actually, I guess I had someone ask for me, but that turned out to be good, because she said “no,” and if I had been right there, I probably would have killed her.

The point (I think) is, you should just ask her. Just walk up to her, put your arm around her, and say, “Hey, baby –” (girls love being called “baby”) “–you’re a babe, I’m a stud, we’re both alone…need I say more?” She will undoubtedly be so overwhelmed that she will lunge into your arms, shrieking, “Oh, yes!” Or maybe she will laugh viciously in your face. I can’t be sure.

Anyway, if she says “yes,” that is a legally binding contract that allows you to walk around with your hands and various other parts of your anatomy firmly clenched to various parts of hers, and also to proclaim in a loud, yet respectful voice to your semi-nude friends in the locker room that you do, in fact, have a girlfriend, and they don’t, so NYAH, NYAH, NYAH.

Oh, yeah. Beginning tomorrow and going through Saturday, the Elsinore High School drama department will be performing scenes from “Romeo and Juliet,” “Macbeth,” and “Taming of the Shrew,” along with a fifteen-minute version of “Hamlet” (which has to be seen to be believed). The shows will begin at 7:30 p.m., and tickets are $5 at the door. The dialogue in all four plays will remain the way Shakespeare wrote it, but the sets and costumes have been altered, so if you are an English teacher, I would strongly advise getting drunk before watching it.

The reason I mention all this is that I, Eric D. Snider, will be playing the part of Benvolio in “Romeo and Juliet,” and the part of Hamlet in “Fifteen-Minute Hamlet.” We’ve all been working hard, and the cast is simply wonderful, so please come out to Elsinore High and watch us make fools of ourselves. And after it’s over, feel free to come backstage and meet the performers. We’ll be happy to sign autographs, take pictures, accept cash donations, and sell copies of “The Unedited Eric, Volume I” (which is NOW available) for only $8. See you there!

Next week: Earthquake safety. Probably. But don’t count on it.

Pavane for a Dead President

0

It is at times like this (that is, 25 minutes before our deadline) that we philosophers stop to think about the important things in life, particularly when we are in need of something to write about.

Let’s see. Important things in life. Family, friends, wisdom, George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, earthquake safety… Ah ha! Earthquake safety!

But before I get to that, let me mention the other topic — Washington and Lincoln. Their birthdays are coming up this month, and they were two very remarkable men, although they would be even more remarkable if they were alive today, as they would be a couple hundred years old each and could probably get real low airline fares.

Nonetheless, they are both dead, and we are celebrating their birthdays. But how much do we really know about our two greatest presidents? Not much, we’re hoping, because if you do know a lot, then you will probably notice that we have made up most of the facts in this extremely informative column, which is actually about earthquake safety.

George Washington was born February 22, 1732 in Westmoreland County, Virginia. For reasons not mentioned in the encyclopedia in which we found our information, at age 11, George went to Mount Vernon to live with his half-brother, Lawrence Olivier. (We are not sure of Lawrence’s last name; we thought “Olivier” looked good. We are journalists, so we can do that.)

In 1753, Virginia governor Robert Dinwiddie (we are sure of that last name, although we kind of wish, for Robert’s sake, that we had made it up) sent a 21-year-old George to the Ohio Valley to warn the French that they were encroaching on British territory. The French, of course, knew good and well they were encroaching on British territory; in fact, they were encroaching all over the place, and enjoying it, but they still told George (in French) “Your mama.” On his way back, George had to walk most of the way, an Indian shot at him, and he almost drowned in the Allegheny River. We’re not sure what he was doing, swimming in the Allegheny River in the middle of winter, but he sure was.

In the 1770’s, Great Britain began enforcing the “Intolerable Acts,” so called because they were intolerable. George wrote, in a letter to someone, “Shall we supinely sit and see one province after another fall prey to despotism?” Loosely translated, this means, “Are we gonna sit on our butts and let England push us around?”

The colonists’ answer was resounding. “Probably not!” they resounded. The rest, of course, is history. George led the colonies to victory in the Revolutionary War, and if he hadn’t, we would all be speaking English now.Then he was president for a while and died.

Abraham Lincoln was born February 12, 1809 in a log condo in Kentucky. As a boy, he loved to read and greatly desired an education. Unfortunately, he lived in Kentucky, where it is illegal to be educated. Not that he didn’t try. He would sometimes walk 20 miles through the snow just to get to school. People would say, “Abe, why do you walk 20 miles through the snow to go to school? Why don’t you go to the one downtown?” Then Abe would get this thoughtful look on his face and start babbling something about “Four score and seven years ago.” His family thought he was nuts.

In 1842, he married Mary Todd, who, in keeping with the current trends in ugliness among women, looked like Moe, of “The Three Stooges.” She and Abe had four sons, three of which died shortly after looking at their mother, whose face alone ended the Civil War by frightening General Lee into surrender.

Abe was elected president in 1860. Before he knew it, the Southern states were seceding right and left. There was only solution to the rebellion — grow a beard. This caused the Civil War.

In 1863, Abe issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which only freed the Southern slaves. The Northern slaves, who had been pretty smug about living in a part of the country where the government hated slavery, were pretty ticked about this, and in response sent Abe two tickets to see a play at Ford’s Theater. While Abe was enjoying “Cats” with his wife, a weird Confederate actor named John Hinckley, Jr. snuck up behind him and shot him in the head. If he had snuck up in front of the couple, where he could see them both clearly, he probably would have shot Abe’s wife, and the evening wouldn’t have been spoiled. As it was, she couldn’t even get a refund on Abe’s ticket.

Next week: Earthquake safety. I promise.

Going Downhill Fast

0

Today’s topic, as promised last week, is earthquake safety. Before I get to that, though, there is something I think you should know about snow-skiing: it makes you stupid.

I have scientific research to back up this claim, but quite frankly, you probably wouldn’t understand it, since I made it up. So instead, I’ll give you the non-scientific evidence.

I went skiing for the first time last winter for two reasons:

1) I was invited. I will do almost anything if I am invited.

2) It looked like so much fun. On those commercials for ski places, they always show action shots of large, rugged men falling off cliffs and skidding along the snow on their bellies like some kind of deranged otter, and I thought that sliding around on packed ice with eight-foot long skis and sharp-ended poles with which to poke out the eyes of innocent bystanders would be an enjoyable experience. “Hey!” I could be heard telling people. “I’m going to go up in the mountains and try to lose the use of my major appendages!”

So I went, and I didn’t have an ounce of fun. It was too cold, I fell down a lot, and I really didn’t know how to ski, having refused to take the free lessons on the grounds that I was “Too Macho.” After about three hours, I quit for the day on the grounds that I was “Too Wet.”

Now, if I had any common sense, I would have never ever ever in a million years agreed to go skiing again. But that one time — those three short hours — affected my intelligence to such a degree that I soon found myself planning another ski trip with the very same people I had gone with the last time.

So I went again with the exact same people, except that my father tagged along, too. He had never skied in his life, but he was smart enough to take the lessons before he tried it. Unfortunately, the one thing they don’t teach you in skiing school is how to keep yourself from breaking the sound barrier as you go down the hill. So here was my father, who had never been on skis before, rocketing down the mountain, jumping off the “moguls” in his “fast” clothes, “spearing” little kids like “shish-ke-bobs” with his “poles” to get them out of his way.

The thing was — he wasn’t falling. My friends and I didn’t like this, so we called his name as he sped past us, disrupting his concentration and causing him to plunge headlong toward the bottom of the mountain. That was almost all the fun we had that day, making my father fall down.

I eventually got tired and went down to the lodge to rest for a while. From the deck, I had a clear view of the ski slopes, and it was at this point that I made my discovery. I was just sitting there, drinking my $1 can of soda and eating my $2.75 slice of pizza, when I decided that I would observe the skiers at the very top of the mountain.

The very top of the mountain is called the Insane Person’s Slope because 1) there are moguls all over the place, 2) it is very very steep, and 3) that is where the snow-making machines are, and if the wind blows just right, you’ll get caught in a snow flurry and you won’t be able to see that there are moguls all over the place and that the hill is very very steep. Despite all these adverse conditions, however, there were still quite a few people up there, most of them clinging to the lift machine and sobbing about how they didn’t want to go down after all.

But I began watching the ones who were brave and/or stupid enough to actually attempt to ski down the hill. What I noticed was that when they finally landed at the bottom of the mountain, the ones whose leg bones were not protruding from their flesh would get up and go do it again! I could not understand this.

After about an hour of observing, I made my startling discovery: The snow from the snow machines was going inside people’s ears, crystalizing in their heads, and preventing their brain cells from functioning properly. This is why, even though they had all ready nearly killed themselves, the skiers would go and try it again. The fake snow was killing their brain cells!

Then I realized — I was one of those people! I had gone skiing once before, hated it, and GONE AGAIN ANYWAY!! The fake snow had infected my brain, just as it was infecting these poor, unaware people’s brains! It was like being in that movie “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” and suddenly discovering that you were one of the pod people! It was horrible.

So I’m going again this month.

Next week: earthquake safety.

Life of a Columnist Not Too Earth-Shaking

0

This column is about earthquake safety. But before I get to that, let me tell you what it’s like being a columnist.

There are several things that we columnists have to do frequently. The first thing is, we have to write columns. This is sometimes a big pain in the rear, particularly when we’d rather be out on a date with an attractive girl who thinks we’re funny, but NO! We have to sit in this cramped little newspaper office and attempt to type and keep some semblance of a train of thought despite that fact that whoever owns the portable radio has it permanently tuned to an oldies station that only plays Elvis Presley and whoever did “Duke of Earl” and it is driving us nuts and we are just about ready to stomp out the door in search of gainful employment without even storing our work on the computer first. That is how angry we are.

The second thing we have to do is suffer through conversations with people who don’t think that writing is an actual profession, which it’s not, but who are they to say so? I had to deal with one of these people a couple years ago, when I planned out my class schedule for my sophomore year. My regular counselor was busy, presumably with more important students, so my parents and I instead met with a woman whose name I won’t mention because 1) she has access to my transcript and 2) I don’t know how to spell it.

In the course of this meeting, she asked me what I planned to do when I graduated from college. I told her, just as I would tell anyone who cared enough to ask, that it was none of her dang business, and where was my real counselor. But I eventually told her I want to be a writer.

When I said that, though, she chuckled in the patronizing manner you might use if a relative came up and told you that he or she was going to fly off the roof of the barn. “A writer,” she said to my parents. “Yeah, my son always wanted to be a writer…”

My mother, offended by this obvious lack of faith in teenagers, attempted to choke the counselor to death with the strap of her purse and had to be restrained by my father. I found the whole thing pretty amusing.

The third, and perhaps most important thing we have to do is get paid. If it weren’t for the money, we columnists would probably chuck it all and get a real job. “Chuck it!” we would say. “I’m going to go get a real job.”

The only problem with the getting paid part is when you’re a “free-lancer” (or, in layman’s terms, “large pile of worthless gravy skin”), which means that you are not on the actual staff; you just write for the paper in your free time. The problem with this in regards to getting paid is that for a free-lancer to get any money, he has to write out a list of what he’s written and figure out himself how much he is owed by the large, faceless, company and then mail it off to the Payroll Department and wait for the Payroll Persons to send him a check, which sometimes takes several weeks, and the poor writer keeps putting off his Christmas shopping because he doesn’t have any money yet, and he FINALLY gets the check THE DAY BEFORE CHRISTMAS and has to rush out and buy things at the last minute for his friends and loved ones, who have been telling him since he got this creepy job last May that he should find a slightly more stable occupation, such as time bomb deactivating, but did he listen? NO!! He’d rather rush around like a crazy person on Christmas Eve!

The fourth thing we columnists have to do sometimes is write columns in advance, which is what I’m doing now. I knew I would be busy about this time with finals at school, as well as my involvement with the school play, so back during Christmas vacation, I wrote a few spare columns, including this one, which is about earthquake safety. I tried to pick a topic that would be appropriate at any given moment, but then I got to thinking: What if, just the day before this column appears, a major earthquake strikes Southern California, one so large that vice-president Quayle flies out in a helicopter and frowns at what’s left of the area and makes an official statement such as “Golly!” or, perhaps, “Wow!”? Won’t I appear insensitive, making fun of earthquakes just the day after a big one hits?

Then I remembered the last thing we columnists must do sometimes, the thing that makes the world realize that we are, in fact, caring, responsible journalists with rational human emotions.

Sometimes, we have to say, “So what?!?” and do it anyway.

Next week: Earthquake safety. No matter what.

I Was Lucky, Butt….

0

Last Tuesday was a very eventful day for me, because I witnessed something that pertains to the First Amendment and Freedom of Expression, and so forth, something that could rock the Constitution at its very foundation. But even more importantly, I saw a Bob’s Big Boy statue plummet to the earth from an airplane.

This was apparently in honor of Elvis Presley’s 56th birthday. Mark Thompson and Brian Phelps, from KLOS’ popular “Mark and Brian Show,” were at Skylark Airport to drop a Big Boy statue dressed as The King out of a plane. He had a parachute, of course.

I found out that this was going on the day before, and I really wanted to go, but there was one minor problem. School.

The obvious solution, of course, was to ditch. Everyone else ditches all the time, but I never had, and plus, I really needed to go to my first two classes. Besides, I didn’t know HOW to ditch.

Or so I thought. As it turns out, all I had to do was follow this simple one-step process:

1. Walk out the gate.

For some reason, I thought it would be much harder than this. I just naturally assumed that ditching school would involve deception and sneaking around and wearing dark clothing and, perhaps, gunfire, but it didn’t. I just walked out.

(Before you get upset over my juvenile delinquency — I know a lot of you look up to me — I think I should tell you that they want us to ditch. The fewer kids they have to take care of, the more they can concentrate on organizing faculty luncheons.)

Anyway, I drove to the airport and saw, by my count, A MILLION other people who should have been in school. I guess ditching isn’t really that hard after all.

Just after I got there and pushed my way to the front, pretending to be a journalist, Lucky Butt came out, much to the surprise and enjoyment of the crowd. Lucky Butt is a man whose rear end has some kind of magical charm, so he displays it for everyone to see whenever something big is about to happen, such as building a shopping center or dropping a statue out of an airplane, but I guess you knew that, since you were there. EVERYONE was there. Don’t try to tell me you weren’t there, because you were. You probably had some young children who kept running across the runway, and you probably had a camera so you could take detailed pictures of a bunch of people crowding around what may well have been Mark and Brian, and you were probably smoking right in my face. Admit it. You were there. Your high school-aged kids were probably there, too.

So they dropped Elvis-Bob out, and everything was fine, and I got back to school just as lunch was starting. I went to the snack bar to buy what passes for food, and that’s where I saw the aforementioned First Amendment violation. There was this sophomore standing there whose T-shirt read “Kick Some Butt.” I’m not even editing that for you sensitive-eyed readers. That’s exactly what it said.

One of the campus aide persons, whose name I think is Bubba, or at least it should be, didn’t think this slogan was appropriate, however, so he made the poor sophomore take it off and put it back on inside-out so that no one could read it. I guess I don’t really care about the First Amendment thing (I just put that in the first paragraph so you’d keep reading), but there are two things about this T-shirt incident that I find silly.

1. The guy had to take it off and put it back on inside-out RIGHT THERE in the snack bar line. I wonder which is more “obscene” — the word “butt,” or a shirtless young man standing in the middle of a high school quad. (I checked, by the way, and being without a shirt on campus is against the rules, unless you’re in a locker room, which this guy was not. If Bubba had made him walk over to the locker room, though, there was a chance that some more students’ minds may have been polluted by the shirt on the way there, and they might have grown up to become mass murders or high school vice-principals or politicians or something horrid like that. So I guess Bubba did what was in everyone’s best interest. Way to go, Bubba!)

2. It’s rather ironic that less than two miles away, half the school was watching a man called Lucky Butt moon a crowd of Mark and Brian fans and no one seemed to care, nor will any of those students be punished for ditching school, but back at good ol’ Elsinore High, a student was being harassed for having a shirt that said “butt.” Maybe he should have ditched, like the rest of us. It’s not very hard, and no one ever gets in trouble for it.

When I Think about You, I Interview Myself

0

EDITOR’S NOTE: On this special occasion — that of Eric’s 25th column — we thought it might be nice to have a question/answer session with the award-winning columnist.

Q: You never won any award.

A: Shut up.

Q: How did you start writing “On the Light Side?”

A: I wrote a really funny letter to the editor-in-chief, with whom I have since become very close — I think his name is Bob, or something like that — telling him that if he didn’t hire me as a columnist, he would never see his children alive again. After I threatened to scratch the paint on his car, too, he gave in and hired me. This is more or less that way people get themselves elected to public office. They tell you that if you don’t vote for them, all these terrible things will happen to the Economy and the Government in General, when everyone knows that the only consequence of them not getting elected would be that they would have to go out and find real jobs, which might be difficult, since many of them have the brains of a phone book.

Q: Have YOU ever been elected to public office?

A: No, but I’m considering running for Student Body President in May, just to see if anyone really votes for me.

Q: What if you win?

A: Heck will have frozen over, so I don’t think anyone will care who Elsinore’s A.S.B. president is.

Q: Why did you say “heck” instead of “hell?”

A: After my October 24 column, in which I said “hell” twice, my father told me to say “heck” from now on.

Q: What else did he tell you?

A: To clean my room.

Q: Did you?

A: No.

Q: When you started writing this column, what previous writing experience did you have?

A: When I was in the fifth grade, I wrote about the happenings at Elsinore Elementary for one of the other local papers whose name I won’t mention, but it involves the name of a very hot heavenly body, and then the word “Tribune.”

Q: You wrote for the “Julia Roberts-Tribune?”

A: What are you, a moron?

Q: I’ll ask the questions around here. What am I, a moron?

A: Yes.

Q: Did anything else interesting happen when you were in fifth grade?

A: Yep. I asked this girl I liked if she would “go with me,” the primary result of which would have been that I would have been able to honestly say that I was going with someone, and do you know what she said?”

Q: What?

A: She said, “Go find a stray dog.”

Q: Oh, my. What did you do?

A: My lawyer told me not to answer if you asked me that.

Q: Has anyone ever become really upset over something in your column, I mean so upset that they wanted to burst through your bedroom window one night and set fire to your pajamas and feed your carcass to wild forest animals?

A: Oh, my, yes. Back in October, I talked about how football was going to be the destruction of western civilization, as well as my social life, because all the girls I ask out can’t go because they’re either a football player’s girlfriend or else because they’d rather spend their Friday evenings watching a bunch of athletic guys in tight pants run around and sweat, I have no idea why. I also subtly suggested that all football players and football fans are drooling idiots with IQ’s somewhere between “artichoke” and “Geraldo.”

After I wrote this, I was surprised to learn that not only had a lot of football players read it (and I won’t make any “football player/literacy” jokes here), but that most of them liked it! There was, though, one guy (whose name I won’t mention in the interest of me not having to flee to Mexico) who DIDN’T like it. What he said was, “It’s funny and all, but, you know…don’t do that kind of thing.” I believe he belched once or twice, too. I didn’t know it was blasphemy to make fun of football.

Q: It is.

A: Oh. The next time I really annoyed someone was just two weeks later, on Halloween. I made a comment about a certain group of girls at school called “Death Rockers” who apply their make-up with paint sprayers, and, naturally, they didn’t take it too well. I got a few death threats, but I knew that if they ever came near me, all I’d have to do is throw water on them and they’d melt. They never tried anything.

Q: Are you afraid of them?

A: No. I am afraid of that football player, though. Hey, guy! Don’t take all that football stuff seriously! I love football the way I love my editor, Jim!

Q: Which of your columns do you like the best?

A: Why do you keep asking me all these questions?

Q: It’s my job.

A: Oh. I think the one from July where I talked about the school administration and how I thought they’d made some ridiculous decisions is my favorite one. It was very funny (if I do say so myself, and I do), but it had a message, too, although for the life of me I can’t remember what it was.

Q: Which of your columns do you like the least?

A: I’m beginning to not like this one, if you get my drift.

Q: I’ll ignore that. What is the toughest part of writing “On the Light Side?”

A: Probably dealing with all the people who, anytime something remotely amusing happens, quickly turn to me and say, “You should write a column about that!”, apparently thinking that even though I am very funny in writing, I have no idea when things in real life are humorous and that they should take it upon themselves to tell me.

Q: What does the “D” in your name stand for?

A: I don’t know.

Q: Liar.

A: Your mama.

Q: Why, you–

A: Bring it on, pal.

EDITOR’S NOTE: At this point, Eric and the interviewer began trying to poke one another’s eyes out. After the fight was broken up, the interview resumed…

Q: Is it true that you have a book out?

A: Why, yes. Funny you should mention that. It’s a collection of all my columns so far, including this one.

Q: Why should people buy this book?

A: So I can make money.

Q: But what is the major attraction of the book?

A: Well, from time to time (like every week), something gets cut out of my column either because of space limitations (very often) or because of taste limitations (not so often). But in this book, all of the columns have been restored to their original, pure forms.

Q: If someone got really rich or really stupid or really drunk and actually wanted to buy this book, how would they go about it?

A: It will be on sale at Bits, Bytes, and Books, a new bookstore near Builder’s Emporium in Lake Elsinore, for $8 later on this month. The title is “The Unedited Eric, Volume I.” Ask for it by name.

If you’d rather, you may send $8, plus $2 for shipping and mishandling, to Eric D. Snider, “The Unedited Eric, Volume I”, [my home address followed, but I’m not putting it here on the Internet, or else you’ll all just send harassing letters to my parents]. Please don’t call or write this newspaper about it. The receptionists have enough to worry about.

Q: Are you serious about all this?

A: Very.

Q: Well, thank you for the interview.

A: You’re welcome. Now who are you?

Tardiness Never Was Happiness

0

Ihad to serve a detention recently because I had three tardies to chemistry class and public floggings are no longer permitted in school. This was only the second time that I’d been given that punishment (the detention, not the flogging); the other time was last year, after Ed Farrell and I accidentally walked out of Algebra II class fifteen minutes early.

That was an honest mistake though. Everyone else was sneaking out, and Ed and I naturally assumed that twelve wrongs make a right, so we left too. Mr. Hamilton began to suspect that something was up, though, when he poked his head out of his grade book and discovered that he was alone in the room. So we all got in trouble.

Anyway, I got this chemistry detention because of my inability to walk the 17.4 km from English to chemistry in the allotted time (8 minutes). I apparently failed to run the race on three separate occasions, because one day I walked into class and my teacher said, “Okay, class. Before we do some lunatic thing with a bunch of possibly explosive chemicals, Eric needs to go to the B.I.C.!”

Oh, didn’t I mention that? B.I.C. (Behavior Intervention Center) is the room where detentions are served. Last year we had a room called the “Penalty Box,” also for detentions. The B.I.C., however, is entirely different from the Penalty Box in that in the Penalty Box, all of the words on the signs were spelled correctly. Some semi-literate person whose salary is paid by your tax dollars did the signs this year, and it makes me question the school’s intent to really educate us when the people in charge don’t know the difference between “your” and “you’re.”

Anyway, I was handed this little white slip ordering me to goose-step on over to the B.I.C. and schedule my detention. I guess I can understand being punished for three tardies because if you add them up, I was probably an entire MINUTE late, and goodness knows that in that minute, my teacher could have TAKEN ROLL!!!!

What annoys me is that I didn’t even know I had two tardies! I don’t keep track of them; I happen to think that there are better uses for what brain cells I have than remembering how many times I’ve come into a class a few seconds late. I need a few of them, for instance, to remember where I parked my car in the student parking lot, which, by the way, often resembles the Indy Speedway, except that on the Indy Speedway, no one ever tries to cram more than seventeen people into the back of one pickup truck.

So I went to the B.I.C. and said to the woman at the desk, “Hello, I’d like a detention, please.” Rather than chuckle at my witticism, she looked at me as though I had just blown my nose on her blouse, and quite frankly, I had half a mind to do just that.

We scheduled my hour-long sentence for the next Tuesday, and she filled out the Official B.I.C. Detention Slip, which had the words “Penalty Box” crossed out and “B.I.C.” written over them in pen. She gave me a copy of the slip, presumably so that if I came in on Tuesday and for some reason they didn’t have my name down, I could produce my receipt and prove that I was, in fact, supposed to be there. I can see how a lot of people might sneak into the B.I.C. and try to serve detentions that they weren’t supposed to serve.

When I showed up to serve the detention, I was handed a sheet of paper that said (and I quote): “We are the best, we know it and we show it.” The large, burly B.I.C. lackey told me that once I’d written that a hundred times, I could leave.

Now, really! Not only is that a run-on sentence (I mean, where did these people go to school? Elsinore?), but making us write it a hundred times is propaganda if ever I saw it! I mean, I realize there’s a problem with school spirit, but is this how they intend to increase it? By beating it into our minds until we become weak, submissive jellyfish? If someone were to tell George Orwell (1984) about this, it would kill him, were it not for the fact that he’s all ready dead.

What’s more, I was told by the aforementioned Miss Congeniality that if I wanted to engage in some constructive, non-brain cell destroying activity such as, oh, say, doing my homework, I couldn’t. I HAD to do this.

But I guess it all makes sense, really. High school is supposed to prepare us for real life, and with the detention policies, it’s doing just that. There must be just THOUSANDS of jobs where the boss orders you to waste time and not do anything productive. And as for being late — I can’t tell you how many people I know have been fired for being ten seconds late! It’s a jungle out there, and the school is preparing us for it by enforcing rules that make us feel like we have the brains of retarded soup spoons.

I could go into more detail about the situation of universally-enforced rules that sometimes don’t make sense, but I can’t right now. The bell’s about to ring, and if you get FOUR tardies, they drag you out in the street and shoot you.

Yes, Virginia, There Is a Santa Claus. I Think

0

I get a lot of letters. Most of them begin, “Dear Mr. Snyder: We would like to send you several large piles of money, Mr. Snyder, because we are absolute loons. So, Mr. Snyder, just peel off the little tiny stickers that you have probably accidentally thrown away because you, Mr. Snyder, are a complete moron, and mail them to us, and we will will send you, Mr. Snyder, ten million billion hillion jillion Milli Vanillion dollars right to your home in Lake Elsinor, California.”

I assume this is because I did something to get my name on a mailing list, such as joining a record club, or being born. It was probably the record club, because I am almost certain that my name was spelled correctly on my birth certificate.

But the point of this column is not to talk about mail. No, wait. Yes it is. But not junk mail. Good mail. Like the letter I got recently…

“Dear Eric,” it began, “I have been reading your work since the dawning of time, and I trust you, both as a journalist and as a human being. So here is my question: Where did Zsa Zsa get all her money? I mean, it’s not like she has a job or anything.

“No, wait. That is not my question. My question is: Is there a Santa Claus?

“Your fan, Virginia, age 9.”

I was deeply touched by the frankness and openness of this obviously intelligent young person, and, since I had nothing else to write about this week, I thought I would answer her letter here in the column.

Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. Only he’s not an actual person that you can see or touch or make obscene gestures at when he cuts you off on the freeway. He is more like a symbol — a representation of the Christmas spirit.

Remember when you were a small child and your mother would drag you to see Santa at the local mall (“local” meaning “in Riverside County somewhere”), even though you hated him because he looked like a big, fat candy cane and always smelled of stale beer? And remember how you would always cry and wet your pants when she sat you on his lap? Do you think that if Santa Claus were a real person, he would have time to go to the mall and have little brats urinate on him, particularly during the Christmas season, when he would undoubtedly be at his busiest? Of course not. Don’t be an idiot. That obviously was not the real Santa Claus because Santa Claus, as I said, is just an image.

You know how, starting December 1, every television station in the country shows “It’s A Wonderful Life” fifty times, and how every station advertises the heck out of it, as though they had the exclusive broadcasting rights to it and as if it were possible to turn on the TV at any time of the day or night and not see “It’s A Wonderful Life” somewhere? And you know how your mother always feels compelled to watch it every single time it is on? All that is Santa Claus.

You know how your mother always takes you Christmas shopping to Kmart, or a place of equivalent class, and how you drive around the parking lot for hours and hours searching for a parking space closer than the McDonald’s four blocks down the street, since you know that you’ll be buying approximately four thousand dollars worth of stuff and if you tried to carry it that far, your mother would probably lapse into a coma and you would probably just regress to the fetal stage, and you finally give up and sneak into a handicapped zone? That is Santa Claus.

You know how your brothers and sisters always get up on Christmas morning at an hour that is only technically considered morning and tear into their loot and get into fights over who gets to play with what because of course no one wants to play with his own stuff, and how everything gets broken even before your parents have even gotten out of bed? That is Santa Claus, too.

So you see, Virginia, there really is a Santa Claus. Everything associated with Christmas — Christmas cards, family get-togethers, large mobs of Christmas carolers singing ridiculous songs, each person in a different key — all of these things are Santa Claus.

I would not be surprised, therefore, if you no longer want to leave out a plate of milk and cookies for him. He probably would not eat them unless they were cholesterol-free anyway.

Merry Christmas.

Volleybawling

0

EDITOR’S NOTE: This column is written in the present tense, but we don’t know why. We suspect that Eric wasn’t paying attention when he wrote it. We’re not sure.

It is Thursday, November 15, around noon. I am standing on a volleyball court in the gym at Elsinore High School, hoping against hope that no one hits the ball to me. My team, which I agreed to manage during this tournament under the firm assurance that I would never actually have to play, has strict orders to form a human wall around me to prevent the possibility of me actually having to come in contact with the ball.

The game has not begun yet, so I have a moment to fill you in on the rather loony turn of events that led up to all this.

It seems that one of the team members, Chris, went home earlier today day because 1) he had a chemistry assignment to finish, and 2) his father is a teacher, so he could get away with it. He was supposed to have been back in time for the game, but he wasn’t. And since I was technically the alternate, I had to play.

“Eric, you’ll have to play,” said Jeff, one of my teammates.

“What, are you nuts?” I asked politely, adding that I wasn’t even wearing the requisite baggy, tacky-looking shorts that all true volleyball players wear, nor had I a tank-top, since I am prohibited by law to wear tank-tops in public because of the condition of my upper arms.

But here I am anyway. I’m looking to the sideline, where several of my supportive friends have gathered to make fun of me. Chris still isn’t here.”Everyone hit it to Eric Snider,” says one of our opponents, Mitch, to his teammates. Mitch is legally a football player, but he is disguised as a volleyball player today, undoubtedly because there is no way I would ever get close enough to football for him to humiliate me there.

The game has started. Everything is going well. I am standing in one corner of the court, technically playing, but not really. The ball is coming at me! “Aaaaaaaaahhhhhhh!” I say in a perfectly calm manner that elicits several giggles from my friends on the sidelines. “Get it, David!”

David gets it. Good. I almost had to hit it myself, which might not have been so bad, since it probably would have veered to the left and hit one of my friends on the sidelines. But we would have lost possession.

Now they’re telling me I have to “rotate.” Thinking this to be a vulgar statement, I tell them they can rotate, too. They explain to me that in volleyball, “rotate” means to move to a new position.

“Why?” I ask. “I’m happy here.”

“Those are the rules,” David says.

“What a stupid game,” I mutter as I look toward the position they want me to move to. It’s the back right corner. The serving area!

“Wait a minute,” I say, looking nervously for Chris. “You want me to serve?!?” I laugh hysterically, hoping to get everyone laughing so that I can escape out the side door. It doesn’t work.

“Yes, it’s your turn to serve,” says David. I hate David.

So now I’m standing in the serving area, holding what appears to be the volleyball. I’ve never held one before. It’s nice and soft.

I hold it in my left hand and swing my right arm back. I hit it. It’s going up in the air! It’s going over the net! It went over the net! I can’t believe it!

Unfortunately, I’m being told, it didn’t go over our net. It went over the net on the next court. They insist that doesn’t count. I insist they are wrong, informing them that I am a team manager and that I know what I’m talking about. They tell me to shut up. I spit at them.

Chris showed up just in time to see my serve and laugh at me with all the rest of my friends. We are trading places now. My friends are telling me, once I am safely off the court, that I did well. I spit at them, too.

As I leave, I reflect on what just happened. I played a game of volleyball! Not very well, but I played, nonetheless. And all my life, I’ve hated sports! All these years I’ve been avoiding sports, the way you avoid enormous aunts who want to kiss you and pinch your cheeks and who you always want to strike with a heavy, blunt object, such as a car. But I actually had a little fun today! Maybe I’m broadening my horizons. Maybe I’m making myself into a well-rounded person. Maybe I will become one of those people that everyone envies who can play sports and is smart, too.

Or maybe I’m just trying to stretch something that only took five minutes to happen into 750 words so I can get paid.

Yeah. That’s probably it.

Un-Covering Football

0

EDITOR’S NOTE: This column is written in the present tense, but we don’t know why. We suspect that Eric may be doing it for effect, or something like that, but we’re really not sure. He never tells us anything.

It is November 16. The Elsinore Tigers are playing the San Bernardino Cardinals in CIF Division 5 Bonus Round Final Jeopardy Playoffs. I am sitting in the announcer’s booth with my friend Ron Chadwick. I decided I should sit with Ron because he knows a lot about football whereas I, when it comes to football, couldn’t write my way out of a paper bag.

This is the second game I have covered. My first game was two weeks ago, in Corona, or someplace, I don’t recall exactly where. It was real cold, though. And I had a cold. My head cavities (of which I have several) were literally bulging with various mucous-related semi-fluids. But there I was, furiously writing notes, taking time every few minutes to expel a major gob.

I didn’t go to last week’s game because it was the same night as the 200th episode of “Cheers,” and if I have to look at a bunch of dumb guys, I’d rather see some that aren’t grunting and sweating and patting one another’s bottoms affectionately (something Norm and Cliff rarely do).

Anyway, here I am now, sitting in the booth with Ron, pretending to understand this football game. It seems to involve the attempted murder of anyone not wearing red and white, because all I can see are these enormous high school students, some of them so large that they require license plates, falling on top of whoever has the ball at the moment and then helping him up and patting his bottom affectionately. There is a lot of bottom-patting in football. More than in fencing, for example.

It is several hours later. We have won the game in Sudden Death Terminal Illness Bite Your Nails Right Off Overtime. Everyone seems real happy.I’m now hurrying through the extremely large and slow-moving crowd to find coach Carrozzo. The crowd is particularly slow-moving tonight because they are High on Victory, although many of them, I suspect, managed to achieve that feeling several hours ago through the use of certain controlled substances, namely the green-ish sauce that is used to festoon the taquitos sold in the snack bar.

I have made it. There’s Mr. Carrozzo. “Mr. Carrozzo!” I say, summoning all of the quick-thinking skills that I must utilize as a journalist. “How do you feel right now?” He talks in to my tape recorder and I nod my head and say, “Uh-huh” as I scan the passing crowd for a date to the victory party, which will be held at one of 9,814 pizza places in Lake Elsinore.

After a few minutes, I discover that Mr. Carrozzo has finished talking to my tape recorder and has begun walking toward the team room. I decide to follow him in the hopes of finding out what he just said, because as it turns out, I pushed PLAY instead of RECORD, and we’ve been listening to Mr. Brouwer explain how Andrew Jackson was a drunken womanizer. Or maybe it was Mr. Olpin. The drunken womanizer, I mean.

I have reached the team room. There is a mass of girls outside, waiting for their triumphant boyfriends to emerge so they can engage in some major spit-swapping. I push through the girls.

I am inside the team room. Everyone is laughing and happy and patting each other’s bottoms affectionately. The atmosphere can best be described as: sweaty. It’s almost like a mist, the sweat. My glasses are fogging up. My notepad is wilting. My tape recorder, which is still playing Mr. Brouwer, is beginning to short circuit.

I’d better get out of here. The semi-nude players, several of whom, I notice, have more upper body hair than all the men in France put together, are looking at me funny anyway. Particularly my cousin, Stephen Kaas, who always gets mad because I never mention him in my football stories. I can’t mention him, though, because all the players look alike, especially when they’re on top of each other, so I never know when he’s done something.

I suppose I could follow my grandmother’s advice, which is to just say “Stephen Kaas” whenever I’m not sure who it really was…

“The Tigers capped off an 8-play drive, led by Stephen Kaas, when Stephen Kaas caught Stephen Kaas’ pass five yards from the goal line and then ran for the touchdown, breaking through several tackles, many of which involved people named Stephen Kaas.”

But that would be silly.

Thanksgiving Is All Relative

0

In case you’re wondering why vast numbers of alleged relatives whose last names you are not sure of mysteriously showed up at your house last week, the reason is simple: it was Thanksgiving and they all expected to be fed. For many of you, the thing you were most thankful for was that only the relatives whose faces you recognize came for dinner.

I have nothing against relatives, mind you. I simply adore relatives. I wouldn’t be where I am today if it weren’t for my relatives, and I certainly wouldn’t have a reasonable topic for this week’s column, which would mean I’d have to resort to my back-up topic, which pertains to phlegm. So I certainly appreciate relatives.

The thing is, when you get a group of people together whose only thing in common is a set of parents, you’re bound to have a few “hassles,” that is, if by “hassles” we mean “gunshot victims.”

With your permission (just try and stop me!), I’d like to relate to you a virtually factless account of what happened at my aunt’s house last Thursday. And you can be thankful when it’s over.

Things started out well enough. Six hundred and forty seven relatives and I were sitting comfortably in my aunt’s living room, some of us sitting comfortably on top of three or four other people, just quietly watching the “Twilight Zone” Marathon on channel 5. And everything was nice and peaceful. If we could have stayed like that forever, life would have been truly joyous and fulfilling, except of course that we all would have starved to death, so I’m glad we didn’t try it.

The day started downhill when my mother came out of the kitchen, followed closely by several aunts and grandmothers and other assorted cooking-related female relatives, all of them announcing in harmonious unison that dinner was ready.

So we all eventually made it to the 300-hundred foot long table that had been set up in the dining room, and everyone had their plates full almost before you could recite “Desiderata” backwards with your head severed from your body and in another room.

For most of my relatives, conversation flowed quickly and freely, just like a babbling brook, and it is not without irony that I use the word “babbling,” if you get my drift. My family can be very amusing when they get together because their main topic of conversation always seems to involve debating who among them is the sickest. This little “quirk” is perhaps most endearing at the dinner table.

“So the doctor told me I had Inflammation of the Really Gross Internal Waste-Related Organ, and he said he’d have to take it out.”

“That’s nice. Pass the potatoes, please.”

“Yeah, but have you ever had a tapeworm? I just got over one. They just clamp onto your intestine and start sucking and sucking and sucking and sucking until Eric decides this sentence is long enough without saying ‘and sucking’ anymore. Then they die.”

“Oh, really? Pass the potatoes!”

“That’s nothing. Back in ‘Nam, I was run over by a tank. That’s where I got this scar on my arm, here…” (Displays his scar to anyone still listening.) “Cool, eh?”

“Great. Now pass the potatoes, darn it!”

And so on and so on. Nothing particularly unusual happened. I continued my sixteen-year streak of never attempting to eat cranberry sauce for the simple reason that it doesn’t look much like sauce to me. It looks more like cranberry lump, or cranberry loaf, or cranberry brick. But not cranberry sauce.

After dinner, someone decided that the best thing for a bunch of turkey-engorged, indigested persons to do would be to go outside and play tackle football in the sandy area that was supposed to be a volleyball court only it didn’t have poles or a net, so it was really just a big sandy area. We did it, but we didn’t like it.

I love Thanksgiving.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Some of you expressed confusion last week when my headline read, “Kristy Grasso is Miss Lake Elsinore, Erin Perez is Homecoming Queen — but can they jump?” After reading the story, you noticed that that headline makes absolutely no sense. The reason is that it was supposed to say “but can they burp?”, which does pertain to the story. There is apparently some federal law against having the word “burp” in a headline, and in protest, I’m trying it again this week. Quickly look up to the headline of this column and see if the word “burp” appears. If it doesn’t, well, then write your congressman. I’m being censored.

The Homecoming Queen’s Got a BRRRRRAAAAPPP!

0

Two major beauty-related events recently took place in Lake Elsinore, and guess what. I’m going to tell you about them.

The first one (not chronologically, but in order of appearance in this column) was the Miss Lake Elsinore Pageant. It was probably very exciting. I don’t know; I wasn’t there. The only reason I bring it up is that the winner, Kristy Grasso, is the girlfriend of a friend of mine, Jeff Sprague, and I just wonder if someday 10 years from now someone will pick up the newspaper and turn to the wedding announcements section and see the heading “Sprague-Grasso” and burst out laughing, thinking that a disease and the Spanish word for “lawn” are getting married.

I also understand that the competitors were not required (as are the Miss America candidates) to perform some kind of talent, such as mime or singing or skeet-shooting. It’s good to know that this beauty pageant was a meat show, plain and simple, and didn’t even attempt to appear otherwise.Oh, and by way of explanation to those who were there, my little brother was operating the lights. That is why, during the dance production, the spotlight was usually focused somewhere other than the girls’ faces, if you get my drift.

The other recent beauty thing was the Elsinore Homecoming Deal. The major difference between this and the Miss Lake Elsinore Pageant is that the Homecoming Court members were all required to perform a talent: they all had to burp.

Perhaps, just this once, I should explain myself. It is a tradition at Elsinore High that once the Homecoming Court has been chosen, the Activities Persons make them do stupid things every day during lunch for a week. There is, I assume, a reason for this, but no one knows what it is. We all just kind of accept it, the way we accept hall passes, when everyone knows that Elsinore High doesn’t even have halls.

Anyway, as an example, one of last year’s events was to make the girls all take turns kissing a goat, which had been rescued from the cafeteria just in the nick of time and which may have had scads and scads of venereal goat diseases, for all we know.

This year, however, the Activities Persons decided to inject a bit of class into the festivities by holding a contest to see which Court member could belch the best.

Normally, of course, I would have no objection to this. Burping is a nice, healthy outlet for people’s frustrations, as well as a few liters of unwanted gas. But I think it was rather insensitive to make these poor girls try to burp when everyone knows that several of them have what’s known as Belch Deficiency, a disease that infects the belchal chords and prevents the victim from burping, no matter how much root beer you cram down her throat. (I say “her” because no male has ever been a Belch Deficient.)

One girl in particular named Jodi Anderson had a lot of trouble getting a belch out. She insists that she is not a Belch Deficient, but I’ll have to believe that when I see…uh, hear it.

Said Jodi, of the whole affair, “I liked kissing a goat better.” I at first assumed this to be a rather cruel joke at the expense of her former boyfriend, whose name is Ramon, or Raoul, or something like that, but she quickly reminded me of last year’s event, which of course involved kissing Ramon. I mean, a goat.

And while we’re relatively close to being on the subject, wasn’t it clever of the Activities Persons to have the Homecoming Court belch AFTER they’d been elected? Personally, I think it should have been stated on the ballot which girls could burp and which couldn’t so we would have known which ones not to vote for and thus protect ourselves from having a Belch Deficient Homecoming Court.

Imagine the embarrassment Mr. Price, the principal, must feel when he goes to Principal Conventions and the other principals ask him how well his school’s Homecoming Court can belch and he has to say something like, “Not very well, but they’re all very pretty and they represent the school quite nicely,” and the other principals laugh out loud and maybe spit in his eye.

As a matter of fact, I think the announcement of the Homecoming Queen should have gone like this:

ANNOUNCER: And the 1990 Homecoming Queen is . . . ERIN PEREZ!!!
ERIN PEREZ: BUUUUUURRRRRRRRPPPPPPPP.

But who cares what I think?

Study, Shmudy

0

Remember when you were in high school? (If it was during the ’60s, you may not, but for the sake of argument, pretend you do.) Remember how report cards used to come out just twice a year, four times at the most? Well, those days are gone for us. We get report cards every six weeks — SIX TIMES A YEAR. My most recent one contained mostly reasonable grades, but My Father, in his Infinite Wisdom, declared that I Could Do Better, and that if I didn’t Do Better, he would Beat Me to Death.

Ha, ha! I’m only kidding! He didn’t use any capital letters.

The most obvious reason for my mediocrity, I guess, is that I am an incredibly busy young guy. Between school and my Other Job and this writing job and the school newspaper and my extremely active social life (that part is really funny if you know me), I have very little time left over for homework. In order to accommodate my many activities, I may have to give something up. Like school.

I guess I don’t have that “Oh-Boy-Let’s-Go-to-School!” attitude that some people have, particularly one boy I know whose name I won’t mention for several complex, journalistic reasons, the main one being that I can’t remember how to spell it. It starts with an “R” though.

R does very well in school, and his grade point average is always higher than that of anyone who has ever lived. With the advent of “Advanced Placement” classes (of which he has approximately 12), it has become possible to earn a GPA higher than the traditional 4.0, and R routinely gets GPAs in the neighborhood of 87.

There must be a lot of complicated reasons for R’s success, but I think the major one is — and you’ll have to pay close attention here — HE ACTUALLY WORKS HARD. Hardly a millisecond goes by that R isn’t READING some TEXTBOOK or GOING OVER HIS NOTES on some DULL, MEANINGLESS SUBJECT or doing ANY NUMBER OF THINGS in LARGE, STUDIOUS, CAPITAL LETTERS that invariably WRECK the GRADE CURVE and cause us to CONSPIRE to BEAT HIM TO DEATH with STICKS.

Take, for example, his book reports. Practically everyone else follows this simple 4-step process for writing book reports:

1. Check the book out of the library the day it is assigned.
2. Put off reading it until the day before it is due.
3. Begin reading it but become bored when the second paragraph is as long as this newspaper and when the only dialogue in the entire first chapter is the main character talking either to himself or to some person who is, technically, not even there.
4. This is a two-parter. You can either

  • a) Give up and find the Cliff’s Notes and more or less re-type them, changing all the literary terms like “protagonist” and “plot” to normal words like “main character” and “stuff that happened.”
    OR
  • b) Write the report without the Cliff’s Notes. (Who is this Cliff guy anyway?) This can be done quite easily by carefully reading such pertinent information as who the author is. If the author’s first name is silly (Ernest, Nathaniel, Sinclair, Hermann, Bubba), the book in undoubtedly extremely depressing, which means you should write that it was a “gripping, realistic indictment of man’s inhumanity to man.” (All books are about man’s inhumanity to man.) If the author’s name is John Steinbeck, the book is probably about Mexicans who live in Monterey.

    R, however, does not follow this procedure. Instead, he READS THE BOOK and writes his report on the basis of his UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONTENT!And that’s why my grades are what they are. I refuse to resort to studying. I may have to, though, because if I don’t resort to studying, I may have to resort to living under the porch. And we don’t even have a porch.

    Oh, yeah. One more thing. You may recall a column from a few weeks ago that mentioned four girls (Jennifer, Krista, Heather, and Angella) and their boyfriends (Ray, Garrett, Mitch, and Raoul). Or maybe you don’t recall it. I know I didn’t. But that column must have been good, because literally TWO, maybe even THREE people came up to me and exclaimed, “Who’s Raoul?”

    Well, as it turns out, Angella’s boyfriend’s name is Russell, not Raoul. As far as I know, the only people who are actually named Raoul are the fictitious characters in my Spanish book. Do YOU know anyone named Raoul?

  • Upper-Level Mismanagement

    0

    “Hot dang!” I can hear you yelling. “It’s time for the second part of the volleyball story!” I’ll get to that in a minute, but first let me address those of you who are saying, “What volleyball story?” It’s the one I began two weeks ago where four of my friends were in a tournament and they jokingly asked me to be their manager, but I, not recognizing humor unless it comes from my own mouth, took them seriously and signed up under the firm assurance that I would never actually have to play. And I suggest that you pay closer attention in the future, and take a few notes, as there will be a short quiz in a few weeks.

    Now then. The tournament, which was held at lunch each day, began Oct. 10. My friends (Jeff, Chris, Stephen and David) and I were there a few minutes early to allow them to practice their “bumps” and “serves” and “spikes” and “screams” and “grunts” and “obscenities.” I, in the meantime, flirted with some girl who thought my fluorescent pink “MANAGER” hat was amusing. My friends, I must say, did better than I did.

    Before the game began, I took my team aside, and, in a gentle loving voice, reminded them that if any of them got hurt, I would have to play. This frightened them nearly to the point of tears.

    Our game strategy consisted of this admonition: “Jump up and down a lot.” As manager, I can proudly say that they really and truly ignored me, except for David, who jumped a lot, but only, I suspect, to show off the fact that his calves are superior to Jeff’s (who thinks his are really hot stuff just because when he flexes them, they hit other people in the shin and create bruises).

    The first game went rather well. They cooperated with each other, their hits were accurate, and they looked, according to the observing girls, really neat in their volleyball shorts, which all matched, except for the fact that they were different colors. They won, but the opposing team consisted of four elderly, decrepit teachers who had difficulty hitting the ball without breaking a wrist, so victory only seemed logical.

    By the time the second game rolled around the following week, the team had acquired matching volleyball shorts. (Volleyball shorts, by the way, differ from regular shorts in that they are much looser and baggier so that nearly any “action” photograph taken of the game would be considered indecent exposure.) The matching uniforms made them look more professional; however, Chris, I believe, negated that when he hit the ball with his forehead and said, “That’s using my head!”

    We won that game, too, no doubt because of the phenomenal managerial support. (I stood on the side, and said, “Go!” a lot.)

    We were to play again the following Wednesday, but what happened the day before that was by far more interesting than any volleyball game, which are all pretty much the same, unless a major bone is broken to relieve the monotony.

    What happened was David said he was going to ditch school the next day and go to Disneyland (“The Happiest Place on Earth, If You Don’t Mind Waiting an Hour for a Three-Minute Ride, Oh, and It Helps If You’re Rich, Too”). The only problem was that we had a game the next day, and if David wasn’t going to be there, I was going to have to take over. This would have resulted in some big-time, earth-shatteringly dire consequences, the primary one being that I would have looked like an idiot.

    Fortunately, David changed his mind, and we won the game. That’s about all I remember, that and how the referee blew her whistle so much that she made me think of Don Ash. I’ll bet YOU haven’t thought about Don Ash for awhile.

    The next week’s game has also been blocked out of my memory (but, then, so has my middle name), but I do remember one thing. It was played on Halloween, and one of the opposing players was dressed as a cheerleader. We instinctively kept trying to look up his skirt when he jumped, which distracted us into losing the first game of the match. Jeff got a date with him, though ….

    I suppose it would be anti-climatic to say that I never had to play, but that’s the truth, and I, being a professional journalist, would never lie, unless I thought I could get away with it. The tournament will not be completely over for at least seven or eight eons, but I have run out of space, so I

    Halloweenie

    0

    Have you ever done anything really stupid that you couldn’t get out of because it was so incredibly stupid that your brain, upon realizing what you had done, ceased functioning? I think we all have, although some people tend to do it more often than others, TV evangelists being Exhibit A.

    The reason I bring it up is that, believe it or not, I have done something ludicrously stupid that I can’t get out of. “What,” you are now asking yourselves, “could he have done that was so stupid?” Well, my friends, you are reading it.

    I have had, up until this point, virtually no difficulty in writing this column, occasionally even writing it while I was legally asleep. The ideas have always just come to me, presumably from some Other Dimension where being obnoxious is considered funny. But then I made the mistake of tying myself down to a certain topic for a certain week, which I had never done before because I had never thought that anyone cared what I wrote about, including me. All of a sudden, though, I had people telling me that they couldn’t wait to see my Halloween column.

    “Halloween?!?” I shrieked to myself. “Is Halloween coming up already? Didn’t we just start school last week? Or yesterday? Halloween can’t be coming up!”

    But indeed, it was. Halloween was nearing at speeds upwards of 500 miles per hour, and I felt obligated to write a column about it. So I informed everyone that I would do just that. I even decided to interrupt a two-part story about volleyball.

    When I sat down to write, though, I realized I had no idea what to say. I still don’t. That’s why I’m dragging this out. I mean, what can I say about a holiday that advocates begging and looking silly? And while we’re on the subject, shouldn’t we leave begging and looking silly to the professionals? Like congressmen?

    Hey! That was funny! Maybe I’m on to something …

    Personally, I never considered Halloween to be a real holiday. I simply cannot respect an event that condones the wearing of orange and black together on the same body. There are, however, certain make-up smothered girls at Elsinore High School known as Death Rockers who dress like that every day, and it’s nice to see that for one day of the year, they don’t look like mutants from the Planet Mary Kay.

    Have you seen these girls? They’re hard to miss. They apply their Sears Weather-Beater Make-up with butter knives and then cover it with Thompson’s Water Seal to guarantee that at no point during the day will they actually resemble human beings. Passersby frequently have difficulty keeping themselves from taking a spatula and scraping the three-year’s accumulation of make-up off the girls’ faces and constructing a scale model of the Statue of Liberty with it.

    But I’m getting away from the subject. I’ve forgotten what the subject is. Oh, yeah. Halloween.

    Let’s see … Oh I know. I’ll look up the history of Halloween in an encyclopedia. Maybe that will be interesting…

    Or maybe not. It says that Halloween began as a way of keeping evil spirits away. Now, of course, we just don’t vote for them again; but the Halloween tradition has still endured for several hundred years, nearly as long, according to some scientists, as Dick Clark.

    One major change that has occurred in the field of Halloween since the Druid Dudes began it approximately a long time ago (maybe even longer) is that kids no longer dress in unique costumes. Mark my words — tonight, everyone will be dressed either as a ghost (a sheet with two eye holes that are useless because they are located in the upper forehead vicinity) or as a Teenaged Mutant Kung Fu Rabid Pit Bull Who Barks When Anyone Walks Past Ninja Turtle (highly-flammable yet very expensive, ridiculous-looking plastic designed to smother small children).

    Oh, hey! My grandmother, who, just last Wednesday, celebrated the 30th year in a row that she has turned 29, just gave me something to write about for the Halloween column. “Why is it,” she said, “that we say ‘Boo!” to scare people?”

    Of all the provocative and interesting questions I have ever been asked, that would probably have to be the least provocative and interesting. However, in the interest of not leaving an inch of blank space at the end of this column, I’ll answer it:

    Saying “Boo!” is much easier than saying, “President Quayle!”

    And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. The big Halloween Column.

    You asked for it.

    I Manage to Screw Things up

    0

    You’ll no doubt recall that last week, I left you hanging when I said that this week’s column would be “a bizarre tale involving me, four other guys, a volleyball and a fluorescent pink hat.” This has not changed; however, there’s some business I need to attend to first.

    Mrs. Linda Westfall, who is the ASB advisor at good ol’ Elsinore High, has the dubious honor of reading the announcements each morning. Most of the time, no one pays attention because, quite frankly, no one cares. But on October 3, Mrs. Westfall caught everyone’s attention when she made a statement regarding one of the wrestling coaches. “Mr. Larson,” she said, “gets the award for TIGHTEST BUNS OF THE WEEK.”

    I did not make that up. She really said it. Out loud. To 2,300 people.Desiring to know just why this Larson fellow won instead of me, I talked to Mrs. Westfall. She explained that as she was reading the announcements, Mr. Larson was sitting there, tickling her, trying to make her mess up, and she wanted to get him back. She apparently figured the best way to do this would be to utterly humiliate herself, hence her buttocks-related statement, and, boy, I’ll bet her being embarrassed really upset Mr. Larson.

    Actually, I’m grateful to Mrs. Westfall, because as long as people go on making statements of that caliber, I don’t have to work — I can just print their quotes and I’ll earn my living as a humorist.

    Now — our story.

    Lately, a bunch of guys at Elsinore High have been pushing to get a boys’ volleyball team started. Because of the miles and miles and miles and miles and miles of red tape, however, they have been, so far, unsuccessful in their attempts. The school’s compromise was to hold a four-man-team tournament, hoping to pacify the volleyball enthusiasts. It didn’t, and yours truly became involved in the tournament.

    I know what you’re thinking. You’re thinking, “They let this goofball play on a team?” This person who is a real “guy” only because he sometimes flexes his biceps in front of a mirror and who works in a Greyhound bus station was actually permitted to play?!?” Well, of course not. Don’t be silly. I was the MANAGER of a team.

    This travesty came about when four of my friends (named, in order of importance, Dave, Stephen, Chris and Jeff) decided they wanted to be a team. Unfortunately, the Official Tournament Rules state that each four-man team must have, logically, five members, in case one of them cannot play. My friends thought this rule was stupid, so, in protest, they asked the person who would be least likely to join a volleyball team or do anything more athletic than kicking a freshman to be their alternate. That person was me. They put my name on the form with the word,”MANAGER,” next to it after reassuring me that, come heck or high water, I would not actually have to play.

    Remember that everyone involved was taking a risk here. They were at risk because they knew that if heck and high water BOTH came and I did have to play, they would almost certainly be humiliatingly defeated. I was at risk because I knew that if I did play and we were humiliating defeated, they would almost certainly gang up on me and remove my digestive organs with sticks. So we all just hoped and hoped that no one would get sick.

    Being the responsible leader-type that I am, I spent literally minutes learning such important volleyball terminology as, “Hey!” and “Get up!” and “I don’t care if your knee is shattered! Get out there and play!” I felt certain as a manager, I would need to stand on the sidelines and scream this complex vocabulary at an ear-splitting volume.

    Another thing I did in preparation for the tournament was to go and pay $8.52 (about a week’s pay for a writer) to have the word “MANAGER” painted on a fluorescent pink hat so there would be no doubt as to who exactly had the least amount of taste in the entire gym. I also found a clipboard and necktie so I would look official (that is, if by “official” we mean “really stupid”).

    Now would be the time when I would tell about the actual games, but I can’t because I seem to have wasted several hundred words on the preliminary, irrelevant details. So I’ll have to continue November 7, next week being Halloween, which will, of course, require an especially amusing piece from yours truly.

    Whew! If I’m aiming for “especially amusing,” I’d better start now!

    New Jersey for Girls

    0

    Igenerally try not to get involved with sports, having realized a long time ago that they and I don’t get along well, and we usually wind up hurting each other. Recently, however, I was involuntarily thrust into the slobbering realm of sports, and it seems to have taken custody of my life.

    The first case of thrustage came about when a girl we’ll call “Bob” informed me of a new rule regarding one of the oldest traditions at Elsinore High School (aside from the Freshman Sacrifice each Thursday at lunch). The tradition in question is the one where, on the days of the football games, the players’ girlfriends wear their extra jerseys. This is mainly so the couple can proclaim to all the world that they are, in fact, still together and that neither of them has been caught behind the bleachers with anyone else yet.

    Anyway, the Powers That Be decided that the girls should not be allowed to wear jerseys. The reason for this, we assumed, was that the swim team was angry because their girlfriends aren’t allowed to wear their swimsuits on the days of the big meets. We were told no, that wasn’t it. We then suspected that just maybe the school says it wants to increase school spirit, but inwardly, they don’t give a flying goat head how much people like the school. No, they told us angrily, that wasn’t it either.

    Finally, according to “Bob,” (whose real name is Krista, but we don’t want to embarrass her), a few of the girlfriends got mad and started a petition, which garnered approximately 12.9 million signatures. That was apparently enough, because James Gwyn (one of 836 vice principals) called them into a Special Meeting. Present at this Special Meeting were the aforementioned “Bob,” along with “Hector,” Mike,” and “Marv” (whose real names are Heather, Angella and Jennifer, but again, we don’t want to embarass them). The four were representing their football player boyfriends, named (and these are their real names), Garret, Mitch, Raoul and Ray. (I mention their names so that the eight of them can see themselves in the paper, find me at school one day and graciously kick me in the head.)

    Anyway, in the course of this Special Meeting, Mr. Gwyn announced that the real reasons for the rule were:

    1. Girls have been known to lose their boyfriends’ jerseys.

    2. Boys have been known to promise their jerseys to two girls, and the two girls have been know to attack each other with X-Acto knives.

    3. The jerseys are made of very sheer, net-like material that looks like a large swarm of geometric moths attacked it. The girls, though, have been known to wear them with only (as they say at Harvard) a brassiere on underneath.

    (I would say, though, that if they want to boost interest in high school football, having a couple dozen girls with see-through tops standing on the sidelines is the way to do it. But that’s just one chauvinist’s opinion.)The rule was eventually repealed, but only for the Varsity team girlfriends — Junior Varsity and Freshman team girlfriends still cannot wear the jerseys because, as Mr. Gwyn put it, “they haven’t yet earned the right.” This will undoubtedly create a stir among the underclasswomen, but, hey, who cares?

    Personally, I think football should be banned because I feel that it is going to be the downfall of my social life, if not all of Western Civilization. At the risk of receiving a truckload of drool-stained, crayon-written letters from football fans, I’ll continue.

    Nearly every girl I’ve asked out has informed me that they can’t go out with me because they don’t want to upset their large, burly, football-playing boyfriends. One girl actually asked her boyfriend, and he grunted, “No,” which made me wonder: Where and when did this guy purchase this girl, and how much did she cost? Did he order her through the mail? Was she a gift? Does he have to make payments? If he can’t pay one month, does she get repossessed?

    My point — you knew I’d find it eventually — is this: if it weren’t for football, these guys wouldn’t be large OR burly, and I (having the charm of 10 men) would easily be able to capture their girlfriends’ hearts and take them to any of the dozens of exciting places in Lake Elsinore (“Want to go see a pile of rotting fish this Friday?”).

    Next week: A bizarre tale involving me, four other guys, a volleyball and a flourescent pink hat. Intrigued? Well, read it anyway.

    Laying Down Some New Facade

    0

    For those of you have been following this column since its conception (an elite group that includes my mother, my grandmother, a girl named Dolores, and maybe my editor), glancing at this week’s attempt at humor may shock you — it’s longer than usual. This seemingly irrational decision on the part of my editor (a lovely man whose name is also Eric) is the result of several bio-chemical experiments performed on the Common Sense and Good taste portion of his brain without his knowledge, and it will be interesting to see if I have to waste 100 words like this every week in order to wind up with 850 total. We’ll see.

    With your permission (like you can stop me!), I would like to relate a more or less true exchange that occurred just after school started involving me and some guy.

    SOME GUY: Hey, Eric! You know that column you wrote a few weeks ago criticizing the school administration?

    ME: Who are you?

    SOME GUY: Just some guy. Anyway, about that column…

    ME: Shouldn’t I identify you?

    SOME SLIGHTLY ANNOYED GUY: No! Now, in that column, you only talked about bad things. Why not talk about the good things the administration does?

    ME: I write a column?

    SOME VERY ANNOYED GUY: (Moans, emits vulgar epithet directed primarily toward my parents, walks away.)

    But all kidding aside (yeah, right). The reasons I don’t mention the good things the administration does are 1) There aren’t that many, and 2) The ones that do happen aren’t funny. So how about some more criticism?

    It seems that as far as Elsinore High School is concerned, the district (or whoever is in charge) has taken a very relaxed attitude, so relaxed, in fact, that if Elsinore High were a person, it would either be dead or Jack Nicholson. Upon the commencement of my junior year a few weeks ago, I noted that the school, in general, looked as though, in the middle of August, someone had said, “Hey! Let’s throw together a high school!” and Elsinore was the result. You want examples? I got examples.

    The most obvious one was the school’s decision to 1) level out the large area of grass in the center of the school, 2) install sod instead of regular grass, and 3) do it all a week before school starts so that no one can walk on it for two weeks and everyone will be crammed into the quad.

    Now, levelling out the ground was important enough. I currently have a 3.83 GPA, but if the ground had been level for the past two years, I COULD HAVE A 4.0!!! It’s about time they eliminated that education-hindering slope!

    But doing it the week before school began was a little silly, and Dennis Price, who swears up and down that he’s the principal, didn’t know why it happened that way. And if he can’t tell me, I don’t know who can. The result of this mysterious action was that for the first two weeks, most of the 2300+ students were jammed into the quad during lunch. This resulted in squished bodies, ill tempers, and several accidental pregnancies.

    (The funny part about the whole thing is — a lot of the grass is dying, most likely because of loneliness. It just didn’t feel needed.)

    Another example of the school’s unpreparedness is the book situation. Quite a large number of students (I’d say between a few dozen and a whole lot) didn’t get all of their textbooks until the third or fourth week of school, and some of them (like, say, me) still don’t have them all.

    The reason for this, so we’re told, is that there were far more new students than the school had predicted, thus, there weren’t enough books to go around. What I want to know is — did they really think they could precisely predict the number of students? Shouldn’t they have ordered some extra books anyway, just to be sure? I can just picture the school board holding a seance at their board meeting, trying to find out from the God of Elsinore Growth how many new kids there would be this year.

    I was recently talking with Jodi Anderson, who is about as omnipresent at school as Vick Knight is everywhere else. She’s a varsity cheerleader, a representative in student government, and a junior, which makes her all the more noticeable because the junior class is by far the most obnoxious. Anyway, we were talking about the condition of the school in general, and she said that it looks a lot better now than it has in the past. Having already written most of this column, I was afraid it would once again be steeped in ignorance, so I asked her exactly what she meant. She mentioned how the doors had been repainted, the outer part of the school black-topped, the new sod — all external things. But what about the things that really matter to the education system? Sure, in some respects, the school is greatly improved. But in many other areas, it leaves a lot to be desired.

    The purpose of this column isn’t to put down the school. I don’t know what the purpose is, but that isn’t it. And I certainly don’t mean to put down Jodi, even if she did refuse to go out with me one night under the guise that she had to baby-sit and I still have not recovered from the emotional trauma of having the first girl I ever asked out say “no.” But when you’re an aspiring journalist, you tend to notice things that maybe normal people don’t notice, like how the 400’s, which have been at Elsinore for 10 years, still don’t have an intercom system, which means you can’t hear the bells when you’re out there, or the announcements for that matter, which some people are kind of grateful for.

    At any rate, maybe Jodi’s right — maybe the external, superficial things are more important. It doesn’t matter. My 850 words are up.

    Revitalization Fever: Catch It!

    0

    Those of you who have recently driven from one end of Main Street to the other may have noticed that you can’t drive from one end of Main Street to the other because of the rampant renovation going on between Peck and Graham Streets.

    This has apparently been happening for a few months, but I never paid much attention to it until my editor told me to get off my lazy behind and go investigate. So when the next commercial came on, I did just that.

    A lot of people (or maybe it was just me) thought that downtown business had been falling off lately, and that this renovation project had been thrown together to attract customers. I learned, however, that you’d have to search far and wide, perhaps even as far as “The National Enquirer,” to find something further from the truth. Downtown business, in general, has been doing just swell and this project is expected to boost sales, if anything.

    I was informed of this in no uncertain terms by one of about 400 receptionists lurking in city hall. “This is a re-vi-tal-i-za-tion project,” she said over the telephone, enunciating so that I could perhaps look up “revitalization” before she was actually through saying it. That word is apparently the Official Adjective for the project, because three different people said it, though none of them quite as clearly as that secretary.

    So if it’s not being done to resuscitate business, why is it being done? According to Gary Washburn, alleged mayor of Lake Elsinore and Phone Book Critic, it’s “being done [for] the image and the character of the city.” Attracting customers will be a side-benefit, he said.

    (By the way — if you’re 16 years old, and you walk into city hall declaring that you have an appointment with the mayor, they will not believe you.)I have heard a couple of people say that no matter how nice things look on Main Street, the image of downtown will still be one of vagrants, transients, and undesirables, or whatever you want to call them. So I asked several prominent downtown persons what they thought.

    Mayor Washburn said that by improving the appearance of Main Street, more people will shop downtown, thus raising the economic level, and “those people” will have to leave in search of some place more affordable, perhaps to Temecula, which, according to GTE, is the hub of the universe. (His Honor didn’t actually mention that last part in the interview; I mentioned it in a flagrant attempt to start trouble.)

    Fred Dominguez, city councilman and owner of Elsinore Barber Shop and Beauty Supply, which is on the re-vi-tal-ized block, said that the “vagrants” probably will not hamper the “new image.” Dolores Mayhall, owner of Mayhall Print Shop, was of basically the same opinion, though she seemed rather bitter toward what she described as “the trash that walks the street.” “There is a definite problem with that,” she said. “People…resent being approached by panhandlers and prostitutes. But [the customers] are not going to stop coming downtown.”

    On the other hand, John Merrifield, owner of John’s Service Center and, technically, my grandfather, was less than optimistic about the whole affair, although he may just have been annoyed because his grandson had just stuck a tape recorder in his face. “I think the [vagrants] are going to keep the image from being the…image that we want. The buildings may look better, but the ‘downtown people’ are still going to be here. I’m optimistic enough to say we can attract business, but it’s going to be a rough road. Rough, rough, rough.” (Grandpa tends to repeat himself.)

    The only person who didn’t acknowledge any problem with the aforementioned “downtown people” was Donna Barlass, president of the Downtown Business Association and owner of Hodge-Podge. When I asked her if she had had any problems with the people, she said, “What people are we talking about?” I gave some examples and she replied, “Well, I’m here seven days a week, ten hours a day….We haven’t had any problems….I am totally unaware of [them].”

    Just as a point of information, John’s Service Center is just north of the block being re-vi-tal-ized, on the west side of the street. Mayhall Printing is three doors south, in the infected block, on the east side. Hodge-Podge is three doors south of that, and Elsinore Barber Shop is across from Hodge-Podge. Only Merrifield, Dominguez, and Mayhall have noticed any so-called “vagrants,” however.

    I can just hear you saying to yourselves, “Well, this is all well and good, and Eric D. Snider is obviously a talented columnist/journalist, and I was just about to write a letter to The News saying so, but what will be the end product of the re-vi-tal-i-za-tion?”

    Well, I’m glad you asked. According to Russ Tourville, General Contractor and Official Big Guy Who Rides around on a Tractor, big trucks will be re-routed away from the new Main Street, and traffic will generally be slower, since the lanes will be narrower. This will make it easier for pedestrians to pedestriate across the street without being permanently injured by people driving at a maniacal speed while searching for K-FROG on the radio.The amount of parking will not be changed, said Tourville.

    So maybe downtown Lake Elsinore will have a new, cleaner image. And maybe everyone will feel perfectly safe and comfortable as they walk along Main Street. And maybe more customers will be attracted to the area than ever before.

    And maybe Elsie will come out of the lake and run for city council.You never know.

    Movie at a Sluggish Pace

    0

    The Constitution of the United States of America, Inc. (where we live) states that approximately every time you turn around, the 147 major motion picture companies can and will put out three or four horror movies each, and you will feel compelled to watch several of them to prove that you are an adult and can be reasonably frightened without wetting your pants.

    More “thrillers” have been made than any other kind of movie, including unfunny comedies starring “Saturday Night Live” alumni. Watching one, then, is always convenient, unless you live in Lake Elsinore, in which case you must drive to Temecula (or, as it is sometimes called, Trafficula). But otherwise, horror movies are always available to fill the need you may feel to impress someone by watching a film featuring several million man-eating things that don’t normally eat men, without throwing up or breaking down and crying.

    Of course, horror movie-watching is more convenient when they are broadcast directly to our homes on television, although it would be even more convenient if they could be broadcast directly to our brains so we wouldn’t have to watch them. This is what my family and I did on a recent Friday night just for fun. We took time from our busy Family Schedule (which, this night, consisted of sitting around, belching, and naming said belches after celebrities), and watched a movie on some cable channel. The movie was called “Slugs.”

    “Slugs” was filmed in Spain, but it wasn’t a Spanish film: it was shot with American actors on location in Spain. You’d think, then, that the actors’ lips would match the words, but the sound was approximately 1/8 inch second after the picture, and the whole thing reminded me of the “Flintstones.”The basic plot (and I use that term loosely) was that all these slugs had gotten a hold of some nuclear waste, nuclear waste being fairly common in Spain, because that’s what they use to get rid of all the bulls after the annual Running of the Bulls (what else are they going to do with them?). The nuclear waste made these slugs behave irrationally and not at all slug-like; that is, they went around eating people the way you might eat a chicken if you hadn’t been fed in a month or two.

    There was, of course, one guy who knew exactly what was going on, as well as your standard sheriff who wouldn’t believe him. (“A pile of human bones with only a few shreds of flesh left and little trails of slime all over the place? Sounds like heart failure to me.”) The man eventually convinced a few of his city official friends to help him get rid of these mutant slugs, and they did so by going down to the sewers (where all mutant animals hang out) and pouring salt all over them. This caused such an adverse reaction that the sewer system exploded and people couldn’t take showers without little slug parts coming out of the shower head. This was rather awkward in Spain, because the closest translation they have for “slug” is “Geraldo.”

    This is just one example of the horror “genre” (French, meaning “genre”). There are many others, the most recent being “Arachnophobia.” I have not seen this movie yet because I have a not-so-rare fear of going to Rancho called “Temechnophobia.” I’m in therapy, but I guess you could have figured that by now.

    Larry Parker Got Me Nothing

    0

    This summer has been a struggle for me, as I have been trying to watch as much daytime television as is humanly possible, and I’m pleased to announce that I have succeeded.

    I can hear you thinking to yourselves (as opposed to thinking to someone else), “Why would this muttonhead want to sit around and watch television all day?” Well, can you think of anything else to do in Lake Elsinore, aside from spraypainting EYC on the walls? Then don’t ask silly questions.

    The first show I’d see in the morning was “The Price is Right,” which is by far the most ridiculous waste of a viewer’s time since Illiterate Week on “Wheel of Fortune.” My mother tells me that I used to love the show when I was a small child of little intelligence, and that my first phrase was, and she quotes, “Bob Barker.” But I don’t believe her.

    The thing about that show that bugs me the most, aside from the rampant overuse of enormous price tags, is that the aforementioned host gets a standing ovation each day. It’s a sad commentary on the state of this country when a game show host gets a better reception than the president.I can hear you thinking again. “Why does this cretin watch the show every day if he hates it so much?” Would you rather I steal your car and drive it into (or perhaps onto) the lake? Then leave me alone.

    After “The Price is Right,” I’d flip through the channels, occasionally landing on the Spanish Channel, which only broadcasts goony soap operas, or “novelas” (Spanish for “goony soap operas”). Two of the titles are “Simplemente Maria” (“Simply Maria”), “¿Que hora es?” (“What time is it?”), and “Nadie Sabe lo que Estamos Hablando, pero Miran no Obstante” (“Nobody Knows What We’re Talking about, but They’re Watching Anyway”). If you listen closely to these programs (and I can’t imagine why you would), you’ll hear such common Soap Opera Statements as “¿Que si tu esposa vuelve a casa?” (“What if your wife comes home?”), “No Emmy para Susan Lucci este año” (“Susan Lucci loses again”), and “Tu madre es una llanta punchada” (“Your mother is a flat tire”).

    The best part of daytime television is the commercials. There are the ambulance-chasing lawyers (“Larry Parker got me 2.1 million, so I can afford to talk like a moron”), the motorcycle lawyers (“John Reilly and Associates got me $175,000, even though it was totally my fault because I was drunk driving backwards down a one-way street without my corrective lenses, a valid driver’s license, or a brake pedal”), and the truck driving schools (“At Dootsen Trucking Academy, we’ll teach you foul words you never knew existed!”).

    And then there’s everyone’s favorite: the Life-Alert commercials featuring Mrs. Fletcher. Life-Alert is a handy device for the elderly and/or accident prone that you wear on your wrist. If something terrible happens where you need immediate assistance, you simply push a button on it (assuming your emergency isn’t that you’ve accidentally sawed off the arm with the Life-Alert on it) and talk into it, and the people at the other end make jokes to one another about what the old duffer on Elm Street has done to himself this time. Eventually, they send the paramedics.

    What’s so funny about this commercial is that the woman in question, Mrs. Fletcher, is perhaps the worst actress in the world, with the possible exception of Baby Michelle on “Full House,” but even she has her moments. If the commercial were realistic — if she were laying on the ground in a pool of some kind of fluid with tears of helplessness streaming down her cheeks and making the pool even larger — why, then it would be cruel to make fun of her (which doesn’t necessarily mean I wouldn’t). But as it is, she is lying in a pool of groceries and saying, “I’ve fallen…and I can’t get up!” in a manner that would only elicit sympathy from persons possessing I.Q.’s equal to bricks.

    Fortunately, school has started, so I don’t have to watch this idiocy anymore. Just in time, too. I was about to hang my pants low on my hips, put my hat on sideways, and join a gang, which would have been more boring than Bob Barker, to be sure.

    The Kernville Horror Part 2

    0

    The story so far: Our hero and four of his friends have been kidnapped by his father and a man they call “Brett,” and taken to the Kern River near Bakersfield. Upon arrival, they have met the infamous Ferguson family, two malicious guides and two guys who are just hanging around, shirtless. The kidnap victims have been told not to lose their paddles in the water because the paddles are more important that life itself.

    Once in the water, we learned from someone who seemed to know what he was talking about that the river was running at 486 cubic feet per second that day, which is the approximate equivalent of being a small animal in the gutter when someone is washing their car, and floating down the street in the available water.

    Because of the drought, the river is much lower than it’s supposed to be, which means there were more rocks to worry about being dashed against. Much of our time was spent standing on small boulders in the middle of the river looking helplessly at our boat, which was stuck on a great big rock that was sticking too far out of the water for us to go over it. We were told, in a highly professional manner by our fluorescent-blond guide, Eric, to “kick that sucker back in the water!” And kick that sucker we did, having learned from the start that if we disobeyed our guide, he would push us in the water and run over our heads with the boat.

    The high points of the river trip were, of course, the rapids, which had such ominous names as Royal Flush, Hari Kari, Surprise, Pinball and When Was the Last Time You Went to Confession? Our guide had an interesting strategy whereby he made us paddle our brains out during the calm parts so that when we got to the rapids we’d be too tired to do anything right which gave him the opportunity to yell about how various inanimate objects, including the wind and the river itself, were kicking our collective heinie.

    After a few hours, we reached the point commonly referred to as “the lunch place.” The lunch place was located under a bridge, and the wife of the owner of the rafting company was there with the food, waiting for us. (She didn’t go with her husband down the river because she has a completely irrational fear of drowning.)

    Lunch consisted of sandwiches, sodas, cookies and a mixture affectionately known as Gorp. Gorp is M&M candy, raisins and nuts all jumbled together, but today, an extra ingredient — river water — was inadvertently added, and the name was changed to Wet Gorp.

    During lunchtime, while the adults were sitting around chatting casually about the day’s events to that point (“Everyone fell out and almost drowned! Ha ha ha!”), we were given the privilege of walking up the river bank to the rapid that comes just before the lunch place, and floating down in our life jackets. My only comment on this experience is: on the highway near the river, there is a large sign heralding the fact that 148 people have died in the Kern River since 1968. As I rode this rapid (rather, let it ride me), I kept thinking to myself, “Number 149, Number 149, Number 149 … .”

    We eventually completed the 12-mile trek and were taken back to camp. So it was fun. I’m glad I went. Really.

    One last note. I have known almost everyone I’ve talked about in these two columns for most of my life. No insult is intended to any of them personally, or to the river rafting company itself. They all know this, but I don’t want anyone else to think I’m an ungrateful, obnoxious little twerp. I’m not at all little.

    The Kernville Horror Part 1

    0

    People often come up to me and say, “Hey, Eric!” Being the quick-witted, fast-thinking humorist that I am, I deftly respond, “What?” Then they say, “Eric, what have you been doing with your summer?” I tell them to read my column and they’ll find out, which usually confuses them, since most people don’t think I can even read, let alone write. Anyway, here’s what I’ve been doing: being eaten alive by bugs, bumping into rocks, and drowning.

    It seems that on July 5, four of my friends and I were kidnapped by my father and a man they call “Brett” and taken up to the Kern River, which is located between the cities of Kernville, Lake Isabella, and Wofford Heights, all three of which are the only places I know of that actually have negative populations. While there, we endured all kinds of cruel punishment and torture, and I feel it is my duty to recount our experiences to you, the uncaring public. That is precisely what I will do in this special two-part report. And away we go.

    At about 6:30 a.m., we arrived at the campground, where we met a man named Brent Ferguson, who supposedly owns the river rafting company that would be taking us and attempting to kill us. Brent’s wife and their four sons and daughters were there, too, because he is afraid that they will run off to Rio if he leaves them home alone.

    (It was Brent’s second oldest daughter, by the way, who ordered me to expose the whole affair. She is to receive every ounce of blame for all this.)

    Also at the campground were two guides named Steve, whose sole responsibility appeared to be eating, and Eric, whose legs were the approximate size of steroid-injected redwoods.

    The Ferguson girls’ boyfriends, Brian and Jon, neither of whom seems to own a shirt, were also hanging around. They had been up there with a group a few days before and had conveniently missed their rides home, so they had no choice but to spend a few days in the wilderness with their girlfriends. Tough break.

    Upon our arrival, we were fed a type of burrito-esque breakfast consisting of tortillas, eggs, and the remains of some small woodland creature. Our first thought was, and I quote, “Ewwwwwwwww!”, but it was actually quite good. The guides, I noticed, ate Frosted Flakes.

    After breakfast, we bathed in Sunblock #412, which actually makes you more pale than you were before, and headed for the river. The Kern River, I’m told, comes from glaciers, which is strange, since I didn’t see any on the way there.Before we could do anything, we had to put on our lifejackets. We were told that if we were to fall out of the boat without a lifejacket, we would almost assuredly be dragged downstream by the powerful current and eventually be dashed against some rocks and drown, whereas, if we fell out with the lifejacket, we would be dashed against rocks, but we wouldn’t drown.

    We were also given paddles, not to be confused with oars. Whenever someone called it an “oar” (as in, “Hey! You just put my eye out with your ‘oar’!”), Eric the Guide from Hell would call them names and push them out of the boat.They told us to never let go of the paddles, even if we fall out, because, simply put, the paddles are far more important and useful than we are. If we did lose our paddles, they said they would cut off our lifejackets and watch us drown, screaming with laughter all the while.

    Ha ha ha! I’m only kidding! They said nothing of the kind! Not once did they say they would laugh! Ha ha ha!

    We did eventually get on the river, but I seem to be out of room, so you’ll have to wait till next week to read about it.

    I know. You’ll count the minutes.

    Molar Eclipse

    0

    Iwent to the dentist recently, or rather, I should say, I went to a dentist, since there is obviously more than one dentist in the world because two out of three of them prefer chewing Trident over chewing on your own tongue.

    I went a few months ago for a check-up for the reason I do most things — my mother made me. They X-rayed my teeth (“Perfectly safe,” said the nurse as she left the room) and then they put me in a chair so the dentist could come and look for something in my teeth that he could say was a cavity. I had eaten an Oreo that day, so he used that as an excuse to make me come back at the end of June.

    So I went back and was led down the hall to the Dental Torture Chamber. It was then that I noticed that the operating rooms were separated by very thin walls, so the screams of the damned could be heard by all.

    After I’d been sitting in the Chair of Dental Pain for a while, the somewhat enormous doctor waddled in with his nurse, who was equally large, but she was pregnant, so that was okay. He told her that they had to install fillings in teeth 3 and 18, and then, talking as if I wasn’t there, he informed her that he would do number 18 without anesthesia.

    “What?” I said, noting that he wore a mask, making it impossible to identify him in a lineup.

    “Oh, it’s a small job,” he said nonchalantly. “We don’t need anesthesia. If we use it, you’ll be numb and won’t be able to eat for three hours.

    I guess as far as he was concerned, excruciating pain is better than not being able to eat. I didn’t happen to agree, but I always respect the opinions of those with sharp, electric objects.

    Number 18 was a small job; I left only a few tooth marks in his hands, which is pretty good, considering he had seven or eight hands, all of them crammed in my mouth. Then he moved to number 3, which was a bigger job. It was so big, in fact, that before he began drilling and filling, he put a clamp around the tooth, presumably so it wouldn’t run away in fright.

    But all my fears, all my stereotypical jibes about the dental profession were put to rest when, as he was working on number 3, the nurse handed him a tool, and he said — this is a quote — “What is this?”

    It turned out that he was LOOKING AT THE WRONG END. Whew. That’s better.But everything worked out in the end, and I’ve gotten over my fear of dentists, because, after all — dentists are people, too.

    Technically, anyway.

    Suspension of Disbelief

    Every summer about this time, the department stores begin having their “Back-to-School” sales, causing panicked students all over the country to run to their calendars and discover that they don’t know if school will be starting soon because they don’t know what the current date is because they haven’t had to write it in the upper right-hand corner of their paper for several weeks. While I hate to be like a department store and annoy the students around here with talk of school, there are a few things I wish to say about the school district and the people in charge therein.

    Throughout my sophomore year, which ended in June, I found myself wondering if just maybe the administration had been sniffing model airplane glue at their little school board meetings, because some of the decisions they made were a bit strange. And guess what. I have examples.

    For instance, in September, all of the rooms in the nether regions of Elsinore High School known as “The 400s,” were re-carpeted, apparently because no one could think of anything better to spend a few thousand dollars on. Well, they didn’t ask me. How about new books to replace the decrepit ones currently being used? Only the seniors (and juniors who can afford good bribes) have lockers — how about buying some more? No, I guess it’s more important to have NEW CARPETING, the scent of which disintegrated the tissue inside my nose that separates my nostrils, than to make things convenient for the students.

    An interesting bit of what my English teacher would pompously call “dramatic irony” took place toward the end of the school year. Twelve students were caught with acid, and not the kind that comes from car batteries, either. One of the students was expelled. The other eleven received five-day suspensions and were back in school the next week. Isn’t it heartening to know that the school board believes in educating everyone — even druggies?!? They may wind up in prison some day, but by golly, they’ll know how to conjugate “to be” in eight tenses!

    But wait, there’s more. During the last weeks of school, notices were displayed advising us that anyone involved in water balloon or water pistol fights would be suspended for five days — the same punishment the LSD Eleven had received. Are we to assume that throwing water balloons is just as bad as the possession of controlled substances (other than the cafeteria’s burritos) on campus?

    The Powers That Be seem to hold the suspension punishment near and dear to the places where their hearts should be. It seems to be their generic solution to any problem. A friend of mine was suspended last year for ditching school. That makes sense, doesn’t it? A student doesn’t want to go to school one day, so to punish him, he is told he can’t go for ANOTHER FIVE! If we follow this line of thinking to its logical conclusion, then if someone is caught spray-painting “EYC” (which stands for Elsinore Young Car-thieves) on the school walls, they should punish him by making him do it on all the walls. If a student goes scooters and wipes out the French Club with an Uzi, he should have to do it to the Thespians, too, right?

    Perhaps the reason for all this is the over-crowding: maybe the administration simply has too many kids to worry about. Perhaps if the new school is ever built (that is, if the kangaroo rats voluntarily get up and move to Los Angeles to become, say, lawyers) such seemingly irrational decisions won’t be made anymore.

    I say “seemingly irrational” because maybe everything I’ve mentioned has a logical explanation. If anyone can supply the reasoning behind all this, please get in touch with me. I’d really like to know.

    Actual News from Actual Newspapers

    In my last column, as I’m sure you’ll recall, I talked about jobs. The response was so underwhelming that I thought (and I quote), “Hey! Maybe I’d better beat this job thing into their heads some more!” Well, let the beating begin.

    We are told from the time we’re fetuses that we can be whatever we want to be in life. But sometimes I think people decide on their jobs according to their names. Like in the recent local elections, there was a man running for County Assessor named Orso — as in, “I assess this property to be worth $94,782…OR SO.” No wonder he won. His name implies such exactness in his work. It’s like having a judge named Hangum.

    Being in the government is probably the best way to get money without actually earning it, but you have to avoid the Psychotic Paper Throwers, one of whom recently made an attack on our fearless vice-president, J. Danforth Quayle.

    (What do you want to bet he made up that “Danforth” part during the election so people would take him seriously?)

    Perhaps you recall this story from last month. Or perhaps you don’t. It doesn’t matter. I’m going to tell it anyway. Quayle was just coming out of a video arcade, or maybe it was a 7-eleven, when some guy got his attention (“Hey! Kid!”) and hurled a bunch of papers at him, bonking him right in what doctors refer to as “the noggin.” The man was taken into custody and charged with Assaulting the Vice-President, a felony punishable by a fine of up to $50, or up to an hour and a half in prison.

    Kind of puts things in perspective, doesn’t it? People try to kill presidents; they try to give vice-presidents paper cuts.

    Another easy-looking job is weatherology (not to be confused with meteorology, which, of course, is the study of meteors). It must be easy if you can get away with making quotes like this one, which came from a Finnish weatherologist on the subject of a mysterious cloud hovering over Soviet territory:

    “It could have been caused by some sort of disaster or accident. But it could also be just an ordinary large cloud.”

    As long as you’re sure…

    I suppose if I actually wanted to work for my money (hysterical laugh, cry of “Fat chance!”), I could always be a doctor and have the supreme pleasure of removing tumors the size of upright pianos, just like some doctor in Florida recently did. It seems a woman went to the hospital complaining of chest pains and wound up having a SIXTY-FIVE POUND tumor removed. It was so large, they had to call in a meteorologist, who thought that perhaps the woman had stood outside with her mouth open the last time Halley’s Comet went by. Upon close examination, however, it was discovered that the tumor was actually the woman’s seven-year-old son, whom she had accidentally swallowed during a feeding frenzy on All-You-Can-Eat Shrimp Night at Sizzler.

    Take My Job, Please!

    Some of you may have suspected that writing for this newspaper was my only occupation, and, perhaps, that it was the only semi-useful thing I’ve ever done. Those of you who thought that are so wrong that I could just laugh out loud, and I think maybe I will when I get a chance, as a matter of fact. I have a JOB.

    Jobs are very important to teenagers because they give them responsibility, self-confidence, and, if they’re really lucky, paper hats. My job mainly provides me with a change to get away from my family for a few hours a day.”What a horrible thing to say!” I hear you cry. “Family is so wonderful!” Well, my family, in all its wonderfulness, would greatly benefit from a stay in the Hoo-Hoo Hotel, if you know what I mean.

    A recent family incident: my little brother, who answers to the name Bonehead, was on the roof foraging for food or something, and my mother was out in the yard. My brother said, “Mom, can I do a nose-dive off the roof?” My mother responded, “No, but thank you for asking.” I went to work shortly thereafter.

    Ironically, I work for a family member — my grandfather, whose name is Grandpa. He’s not as cerebrally damaged as the rest of the family, which is strange, considering he’s lived in Lake Elsinore for 63 years, and I’ve only lived here for 15, and I’m going crazy. But I digress.

    Grandpa owns the local Greyhound bus station, which proved to be lots of fun a few months ago when all the drivers were on strike and the only thing we had to do was answer the phone so people could say, “I know there are no drivers, but can I still ride a Greyhound to Riverside?”, and we would answer, “Yes, but you’ll have to drive it yourself,” and they would laugh politely and call us filthy names and hang up. Imagine getting paid for having that much fun!

    Now that the strike is over, my job involves answering telephones, selling tickets, and giving the illusion of listening when people tell me exactly why they’re going back to Tinkle Flats, N.C., and whom they are going to visit when they get there.

    The best part of the job is when passengers tell us that their boxes and bags have to be in a certain position or else things will break. That’s when I get to climb inside the baggage compartment and tell the Baggage Gnomes not to mess around with the passenger’s stuff or else they will be fired and will have to go back to work for Keebler.

    So that’s my job. It’s not much, but it puts pizza on the table, and it’s a lot better than some jobs in the area — the ones where you actually have to work.

    One of my friends is unfortunate enough to have one of those jobs. He works for a car repair place in the Metropolitan Wonderland known as Temecula (or is it Rancho this week?). His main responsibility is to clean off pistons — not the basketball players (which is what I thought), but little tiny car innards that live deep down inside the car’s engine, where no one can see if they’re clean anyway. Nonetheless, he just scrubs and scrubs those pistons until they’re so clean you could eat off them, if they weren’t so darn near microscopic.

    I assume that this isn’t his whole job, but every time I ask him about it, he lapses in Autonese, and says he’s also supposed to disjartle the fundershloppings, zintz them, and rejartle them. So I give up.

    I have another friend who doesn’t have one of those “working” jobs. He works at an auto parts store located across the street from a bar. His job is to handle the drunk people who stagger in and want to buy turn signal fluid. He usually sells them a fungershlopping or two, and that makes them happy.

    The point of all this is that there are a lot of things you can do for a living, but that only a select few occupations offer money without making you really work for it. And that’s what teenagers really want out of a job — free money.

    Genealogy, I am Spewing It

    Want to hear about my ancestry? Too bad. Here goes.

    I was named after my grandfather, whose name is John. His ancestors (this is my mother’s side we’re taking about here) lived in China until the 1500s, when they decided that England would be a better place for people named Merrifield. In the 1600s, they were bought as slaves for the Mayflower, and they wound up in America, where they’ve been ever since, despite constant efforts to make them leave.

    My father’s ancestors came from Germany. They were exiled to France about seven generations ago when they couldn’t get the hang of speaking German without hocking loogies. They had a lucrative business just prior to the French Revolution, selling cake to the peasants under the direction of Marie Antoinette. Eventually, they migrated to a place where they had to learn another foreign language — Arkansas.

    The reason I know all this is that my father received a genealogy computer program for Christmas, and shortly thereafter, went scooters over his dead relatives. Just mention anything having to do with forefathers, or ancestors, or family, or carburetors, or garbage disposals, or thermonuclear weapons or ANYTHING, and he’ll tell you that he has great-great-great aunts and uncles named Arkansas and Tennessee, and that his great-great-great-grandfather, twice-removed, over four columns and down nine, had 19 children by two wives. And you, recalling what Miss Manners has said on this very subject, would politely fall asleep.

    Since the actual subject matter of this week’s column is supposed to be names (I get sidetracked sometimes), let me give you future parents some pointers on naming your children.

    • Avoid giving them verbs for names, such as Skip and Neal. Someone I heard about had a dog (and dogs are a lot like children, but with more common sense) that was named Stay. This person would say, “Come here, Stay! Come here, Stay!” and the dog would become very confused. Don’t do this to your children.
    • Naming your children after Jesus’ apostles is fine, as long as you avoid Judas.
    • The only vowel that is an acceptable first letter for a name is A. E, I, O and U are all out, except for one obvious magnificent boy’s name beginning with E.
    • Don’t name all of your kids with the same first initial. This is Yuppie-esque, and, in some states, illegal. To avoid this temptation, don’t marry anyone whose name starts with the same letter as yours.

    After my aunt’s first son, Stephen, was born, she decided that she was going to have each of her additional boys’ names start with S and end with N. “Sean” would have been okay, and “Sebastian” would be livable, but the only one I can think of after that is “Satan,” which probably wouldn’t have looked very good on his resumé. Imagine the family reunions …

    “Hello, this is Cousin Satan. Satan, I’d like you to meet my 14th cousin, 7.4 times removed, Arkansas, her husband, Bob, and their children — Edwina, Egbert, Edward, and Simon Peter.”

    Barfully Glad to See You

    Some of you sharper Elsinorians may have noticed that the Carnival/Rodeo made its rotatannual (literally, “every time you turn around”) appearance this past Memorial Day weekend. The carnival has a very deep emotional significance for me, as it was on one of its Demonic Rides from Hell that I laughed until I almost puked.

    I was a tiny child of about six, maybe ten, when I went to the carnival for the first time with my unsuspecting parents. I must admit, I was frightened at the prospect of going out into a public place, where people might learn that I actually lived with both of my parents. But I went anyway, and the first ride my brother and I went on was a huge, diabolical device called “The Eggbeater,” though it was commonly known as “The Vomitmobile.”

    Allow me to explain this hideous object. In the center is a large metal pole. Protruding from said pole are at least several thousand other poles, all of which have a hinge in the middle, so their extreme ends turn in 370-degree rotations. At the ends of said extremities, there are two “cars,” which also rotate. Suffice it to say that you spin around real fast, in several different directions, and if you’re lucky, you throw up before your head explodes.

    Anyway, my brother and I found ourselves being ushered into a metallic box by a tattooed, bearded man whose name tag read, (and I quote), “Bob.” As we were strapped in, I suddenly realized that my life was in this man’s hands. This man, who had mistakenly put on a pair of pants with various and sundry holes in it, displaying his backside, as he had also mistakenly not put on any underwear that week, now controlled my destiny with a panel of levers, each with a name like “Stop” and “Go” and “Go real fast until the ride propels itself into outer space.”

    The ride began with an obnoxious “creak,” causing me to wonder if all the screws had been put in place when the ride was assembled that morning, and we were on our way.

    It was then that we saw a couple in the car across from us just a-smoochin’ up a storm. In fact, we could see his tongue coming out her ear. So I casually commented to my brother that if one of them were to throw up, we’d never know, because it would go directly into the other’s mouth. To two small boys, this was even funnier than belching in church, so we laughed, which is what we usually do when something is funny.

    And that’s why the mere mention of the carnival moistens my eyes, puts a lump in my throat, and makes me queasy. But, then, so did “Joannie Loves Chachi.”

    This past Memorial Day, I had made plans with several of my friends to go to the carnival together, feeling that group regurgitation would help with male bonding. Unfortunately, whoever is in charge of the weather forgot what day it was and sent rain, thus discouraging my pathetic pals from our planned puke-fest, so I went with my neighbor and his kids.

    We were on the bumper cars (which, but the way, were patterned after the Elsinore High School student parking lot) when I ran into one of my many and varied friends of the female persuasion — literally. I’m almost sure I gave her whiplash.

    Anyway, we wambled off the bumper cars and over to the spot where her parents were waiting. She introduced me to her large, burly father, who maliciously shook my poor, trembling hand, fracturing several of those little tiny bones. He was, to say the least, intimidating, and I was relieved to learn from his daughter that he throws up on the Merry-Go-Round.

    I convinced this girl (who shall remain nameless because I don’t want Krista to be embarra– whoops!) to go on the mechanical stomach-churner known as “The Zipper,” so named because when you get off, that’s the only direction you can see — down toward your zipper. I assured her that she could “trust me.”After three or four 490-degree turns on this sucker, she was declaring her trust for me with such impassioned statements as, “I hate you, Eric!” and “I’m gonna barf!” In the interest of saving my clothes from a barf-soak, I called to the operator to leave the poor woman with whom he was flirting alone and let us off. He knew his responsibility to the public and complied with my request only a few minutes later.

    By the way — that girl hasn’t talked to me since then. But I guess that’s none of your concern.

    The Blame Game

    This is the first of what will hopefully be a regular column in which I — an obnoxious teenager who wants to be a writer if and when he grows up — tell you — the sophisticated populace of the Lake Elsinore Valley — my opinions and so-called thoughts on what’s going on in the world (under the presumption that you give a hoot what I think).

    Let’s get down to business. This country is going to heck in a handcart, or, quite possibly, a VW Microbus, if someone doesn’t start monitoring what is shown to our children through the Hideous Beast known as television! It’s just horrifying — nay bone-chilling — to see what awful things are being shown. Take, for instance, the article I read in a recent Press-Enterprise about a little boy who was afraid of being eaten alive by his toilet.

    It seems this kid saw a commercial on television — yes the same medium that brought us such wholesome entertainment as “Charlie’s Angels” — in which a toilet turned into a monster. The article stated that the boy was “scared into constipation,” a phrase previously used only in explaining how the prison guards in Miami felt after strip-searching Manuel Noriega. It (the article, not Noriega) went on to say that the boy “feared it ‘would get him,'” especially when the commode on the commercial made “a chomping movement.”

    At the risk of sounding really old, what is this world coming to?!? Why, I can remember when young people’s eyes and bowels were safe from such frightening images. I grew up in a time when the scariest thing on TV was the fact that Chuck Barris, the host of the “The Gong Show,” was allowed to drive, drink and vote, although I can’t say I ever became irregular over it. Actually, I’m surprised the boy’s parents aren’t suing the toilet cleanser company that made the commercial, since recent studies show that the less you are at fault, the more likely you are to be sued by someone with stupid kids, which reminds me of something else I read in the paper.

    A 14-year-old girl apparently came home from school and saw what she must have thought was a glass of Kool-Aid on the table. Feeling thirsty, she proceeded to guzzle the supposed Kool-Aid, only to find that it was actually Clorox. When she learned Clorox has six times as much sugar and costs twice as much as Kool-Aid, the girl panicked and did what any normal human being would have done — she yelled, “Mom, call a lawyer! My pathetic lack of deductive reasoning skills is finally going to pay off.”

    In the meantime, the girl induced vomiting by reading a teen magazine and watching “Diff’rent Strokes.”

    Lawsuits have been filed against Clorox for not having a label reading, “WARNING: Keep this product away from small children and big children with small brains,” and against Kool-Aid for making their blueberry flavor look just like bleach, and for conditioning impressionable youngsters to think that anything blue must be delicious.

    The girl and her mother probably will not win the last one, as the Smurfs filed a similar lawsuit against Kool-Aid last year and lost. I’ll keep you posted as further details become available.

    And by the way — doesn’t “Kool-Aid” sound like the name of a rap singer?

    Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

    (Written for a 2002 “Reviewer Rumble” tournament among eFilmCritic.com contributors.)

    When the conversation turns to high-quality film adaptations of beloved comic books, certain films will invariably crop up. “Spider-Man” will be mentioned, as will the original “Superman” and the first “Batman,” and maybe “X-Men.” But what happens if you bring up “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles”? The other people avoid your glance, shuffle their feet and awkwardly change the subject, that’s what. “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” was a bad adaptation of a comic book that was highly questionable to begin with. You should have known that; it serves you right that now your movie friends think you’re a moron.

    In our analysis of this 1990 film, which starred no one and spawned two even more no-one-starring sequels, we must begin by accepting one thing: No film whose premise is that radiation can turn turtles into humanoids can be worth more than $1.50. If a person paid full price to see this movie, knowing full well what it was about, well, again, it serves that person right.

    According to the lore put forth in the film, 15 years earlier — 1975, that would be — a rat by the name of Splinter happened upon four baby turtles who were crawling around in radioactive waste, as turtles are wont to do. The turtles and the rat began growing at an alarming rate, and they even learned to speak English, though I’m not sure how that happened, since they lived in the sewer and had no human contact. Anyway, they learned it, and the turtles immediately began speaking in 1980s slang, despite it being 1975, 1976 at the latest. That’s how highly evolved they were.

    Now, in the present day, they are pizza-loving teen-agers, named by Splinter after various Italian artists: Donatello, Michelangelo, Raphael and Leonardo. The happy fivesome has a cozy subterranean dwelling in the sewers of Manhattan, and probably pay more rent on it than you would for a studio apartment in SoHo. Splinter has trained the teen-age mutant turtles in the art of ninja warfare, but has also insisted they stay out of sight, except that Raphael is allowed to put on a hat and trenchcoat and walk the streets, so frankly I’m not sure Splinter really knows WHAT he wants. Parenthood was kind of thrust upon him, and I suspect four active teen-age boys are more than an elderly Japanese rodent can fairly be expected to handle.

    On the streets above them, Manhattan is embroiled in a crime wave perpetrated by hooligans so well-trained that no one ever even sees them, much less catch them in the act. After hearing this information delivered by a TV reporter named April, we promptly see April stumble right into the middle of a heist, thus both seeing them and catching them in the act, which is either an extraordinary coincidence or a bad plot device. She is rescued from the criminals by the TMNTs, all of whom are smitten with her beauty. (This is where it’s apparent the boys have spent too much time away from society, as April is average-looking at best. Also, let us not contemplate the sorts of lustful images that must run through the mind of a hormonal teen-age turtle.)

    April befriends them, as does a weird hockey-playing renegade named Casey Jones. I’m not sure how he fits into the equation, exactly; one minute he’s fighting with Raphael, the next minute he’s friends with everybody. I figure the screenwriters wanted him to be in the movie, couldn’t figure out how to get him there, so they just threw him in randomly and hoped we wouldn’t notice.

    The thieves, it turns out, are part of a highly efficient organization called The Foot, run by a Darth Vader-ish fellow named The Shredder. He also commands an army of stealthy ninjas, which is good, because it means the TMNTs will have a lot of people to fight. Fight scenes in movies like this are like sex scenes in porno movies: You can tell the dialogue exists solely to lead up to them, and they’re the only conceivable reason you’d ever watch the thing. In fact, one line in this movie — “Looks like you’re the one who needs to be taught a lesson” — sounds like it could lead to either a fight OR a sexual encounter. (In this case, considering it is delivered by Casey Jones to Raphael, I am glad it turned into a fight.)

    The turtles had not particularly considered themselves a crime-fighting task force, but then Splinter gets rat-napped by Shredder, so what can you do?

    The movie has some memorable dialogue, but not the way the movie intended it. One of Shredder’s ninjas approaches April at one point and says, “I de-river a message to you,” which is so ethnically inconsiderate that it amuses me greatly. Another time, one of Shredder’s lackeys says, “Why do the turtles trouble you, Master?,” which has that rare quality of being as nonsensical out of context as it is in.

    The dialogue the movie thinks is good is actually bad. For example, this exchange between one of the turtles (they all look and sound alike) and Casey:

    TURTLE: You’re a claustrophobic.
    CASEY: Hey, I’ve never even LOOKED at another guy.

    Men were paid money to write these words, and other men were paid money to speak them.

    Throughout the film, the title characters look like men in turtle costumes. Even after suspending my disbelief, I can’t get past the fact that they look nothing like actual turtles. Maybe if their shells didn’t bend every time someone touched them, or if they ever retracted their heads or arms into their bodies. Maybe if they died after two weeks and Splinter flushed them down a toilet.

    In terms of action movies aimed at young, developmentally disabled children, this one is harmless and unmemorable. But let us all be grateful the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle craze died out as quickly as it did, and that more than a decade has passed since then. We as Americans can be forgiven for that brief indiscretion, considering how long we’ve been clean now.

    Halloween 5

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002, with revisions in 2017.)

    The posters for this movie called it “Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers,” but the onscreen title is simply “Halloween 5,” which is good, since Michael doesn’t really get revenge on anybody in it. Kills some folks, sure, but they’re mostly strangers, not people he had vendettas against. In fact, the two people he would have the most reason to kill — Dr. Loomis and little Jamie — are the two people he DOESN’T murder. “Halloween 5: The Failure of Michael Myers” would be more accurate, though admittedly not as appealing in a mass-marketing sense.

    After an opening credit sequence featuring a pumpkin being carved — an act the filmmakers seemed to think we would find scary — and after a few minutes of clips from “Halloween 4,” we are brought to the present day: Halloween Eve 1989. Even though Part 4 ended with Jamie — the young niece of Michael Myers — becoming evil and apparently the New Michael, now, a year later, she’s just a disturbed child who can’t talk (hooray!) and who’s being kept in a home for creepy children. Why isn’t Jamie evil after all? I dunno. Apparenly, Part 4 was only kidding about that.

    She does have a psychic connection with Uncle Mike, though, and can tell when people are in danger of him. Also, a lot of townspeople THINK she’s evil, and they throw rocks through her window with notes attached to them that say, “The evil child must die!” Just add that to the pile of terrible, terrible things that happen to this girl in the interest of traumatizing her beyond the point of humanity. I would not be surprised if both the character and the actress who played her later turned to a career in pornography. In fact, I would be disappointed if they didn’t. (The actress, Danielle Harris, did go on to appear in “Urban Legends,” which is sort of the same thing.)

    Jamie’s foster parents are out of town this weekend, but she’s safe and warm at the creepy-children’s hospital, under the disquieting care of half-melted Dr. Loomis (played by the aforementioned Mr. Pleasence). Loomis is pretty frustrated with the fact that Jamie can’t talk and help him find Michael; how he knows Michael is even still alive is beyond me, since Michael died at the end of Part 4.

    Michael is still alive, of course; he swam down a river and then stumbled into a shack belonging to an old man, who nursed him back to health and took care of him for a year before Michael killed him, because Michael is trash. Anyhoo, somehow Dr. Loomis figures out Michael must still be alive — probably all the freaking out Jamie does clues him in — and wants to catch him, and the police cooperate but are really, really stupid and do more harm than good, adding more weight to the argument that we shouldn’t even HAVE police in this country.

    Jamie’s foster sister Rachel, left over from the last movie, gets killed before long by Michael Myers, who doesn’t even bother hiding anymore. He pretty much just stands around where anyone could see him, often in broad daylight, and yet no one sees him. You’d think a town that had been victimized just a year earlier by a Halloween-themed serial killer would be more alert on the anniversary of it. You’d especially think Rachel would be on her toes, considering she was one of Michael’s primary targets last year. But who am I to judge? No one’s ever tried to kill me with a knife. Maybe I’d pretend it never happened, too.

    Anyway, Rachel gets killed, which is fine with me, but her replacement as heroine is her annoying ’80s friend Tina, a bedenimed vixen with a loathsome boyfriend and an even loathsomer fashion sense. Because she is the most irritating person on the face of the earth, it is in keeping with the perverse sense of justice employed by these movies that she is destined to live until the movie is almost over.

    Michael seems to have killing Jamie as his goal, but he is easily distracted from it. He comes upon a Halloween party attended by randy teens (“Friday the 13th” was on its Part 8 by now; the “Halloween” folks obviously had been watching and taking notes), where he decides he ought to kill all of them, all of them, I tell you! How he thinks this will help him kill Jamie, I don’t know. Maybe he’s just practicing. At any rate, a really blond couple, including a nearly bald teen-age boy, is having sex — he with his pants on and not even unzipped, don’t ask me how — when Michael skewers them with a pitchfork. You like to see that happen. I do, anyway.

    Loomis has it in his head that if Michael kills Jamie, his “rage” will be quieted, and he’ll stop killing. So he uses the poor girl as bait, back at Michael’s childhood home, which has grown into a Victorian mansion. The question is whether she is just bait to lure Michael there so they can kill him, or whether the insane Loomis actually plans to deliver her up to her murderous uncle. There are hints of good filmmaking in all that.

    Another hint of quality comes with a mysterious dark figure who lurks around the movie and in the end busts Michael out of jail. It is merely a hint, though, as it is not resolved in this film, and it is patently unfair to introduce such major plot points solely for the purpose of setting up a sequel.

    When all is said and done, it turns out that maybe, all Michael needs is to be loved. Or to kill people. It’s very heartwarming, anyway. You’d be hard-pressed to call the movie “good,” but it’s less dull than Part 4.

    Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002 as part of a retrospective on the “Friday the 13th” series.)

    Of all the “Friday the 13th” movies — and I think there were 19 or 20 or them — “Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan” probably annoyed me the most. And that’s really saying something, too, considering Part 6 gave me the dry heaves and Part 5 killed my dad.

    Part 8 has the alluring title of “Jason Takes Manhattan,” which causes one to think of so many wonderful things. At last, Jason will be out of the woods and in civilization! New York is a crazy place; will anyone even notice him? Jason is a guy who kills (or tries to kill) every person he sees. How will he react in a city with several million people? The mind reels at the possibilities. We’ve sat through seven crappy movies so far; now, finally, there might be some pay-off, some reason to have learned so much about the automated killing machine we call Jason.

    And then … Jason doesn’t actually GET to Manhattan until more than an hour of the film has passed. And when he does arrive, he spends 20 minutes chasing kids through a deserted part of town that could be ANY city. We only get a few minutes of “only in New York” material, and it’s all at a point in the movie when no one cares anymore, i.e., the end. It’s the ol’ bait-and-switch. We’re lured in with promises of Manhattan mayhem, and all we get is more of the same stupid stuff.

    The bulk of the film takes place on a cruise ship. Jason gets reawakened from his watery grave by a boat anchor (“I have to go drop the anchor” is what the beefy teen says, and now we go around saying “I have to go drop the anchor” as if it’s a euphemism for something), and wouldn’t you know it, he’s pissed. I admit, I’m cranky when someone wakes me up, too, and I’ve been known to glare at a roommate or snap at a coworker. But I draw the line at homicide.

    Anyway, Jason winds up aboard a tiny cruise ship that is carrying the local high school’s very small senior class out to sea for a graduation trip. Somehow, Crystal Lake now leads to a river (so we’re told), which goes out to the ocean, and it all starts at a point where there are a lot of huge mountains nearby, despite there being none in New Jersey, which is where Crystal Lake is. Once again, no one’s bothering to watch the previous movies before making a new one.

    There’s an evil teacher chaperoning the trip, and he’s the uncle of Suzi, the main character. She had some kind of trauma as a kid that now makes her afraid of the water, for fear dead old Jason Voorhees will drag her down to her death. Helpfully, a real snotty girl who thinks Suzi is weird (which she is) pushes her overboard, forcing her to face her fear and almost die in the process.

    Then Jason starts killing people on the ship. For the first time in the history of the “Friday the 13th” movies, everyone who is still alive actually discovers that someone among them has been killed, realizes there’s a murderer in their midst, and starts looking for him. (They split up to do this, naturally.) In the past, no one ever found a body unless they were about to become one, too. Congratulations on finally wising up, you bunch of dunderheaded teen-agers.

    It becomes a bedroom farce, with Jason slipping out of one room on the ship just as someone enters the one next to it. Eventually, everyone dies except for Suzi, her gayish boyfriend Jim, the evil teacher-uncle and a couple others. They get on a lifeboat that floats into New York Harbor. They land on a dock, followed closely by Jason, who either hung onto the boat like a barnacle or swam after them. In either case, you have to ask: Why? Why not just stay at Crystal Lake and wait for a new batch of victims to arrive? He apparently has some personal vendetta against this particular group of people, but darned if I know what it is.

    In the end, he gets killed by a sea of toxic waste in the sewer, which melts away all the Jason-ness and leaves behind the little boy who drowned in Crystal Lake all those years ago. If this makes sense to you, then you deserve this movie.

    More than any other film in the series, Part 8 has Jason defying all laws of time and space. He appears around one corner, the victim runs, and next thing you know, Jason is on the deck above them. Or he’ll appear outside a window and then come through the door on the opposite wall. It’s not sloppy editing; it’s meant to suggest Jason can move really quickly. But I’m not buying it.

    He commits some pretty weak murders in this one, too. In one instance, he kills someone — really — just by strangling them. An old classic, sure, but not very exciting to watch. Another time, he throws a guy overboard, and we’re supposed to think that did him in.

    Making up for the lame murders, though, is a great one where he literally punches a guy’s head off. That’s the sort of thing that SHOULD be the only reason the series was conceived: outrageous deaths done with flair. Goodness knows we’re not watching just so we can see the sights of Manhattan.

    Child’s Play

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002.)

    Like many horror films that spawned innumerable sequels (well, four of them), “Child’s Play” — the one about the evil doll named Chucky — is not especially good, and certainly not worthy of producing sequels, innumerable or otherwise. It is not funny enough to be a comedy, but not scary or gory enough to be a worthwhile entries in those genres, either. It does, however, star a malevolent talking doll, which scores a lot of points in my book.

    The perambulatory, sentient plaything who murders people is an idea almost guaranteed to be laughable, though a memorable “Twilight Zone” episode managed to do it quite creepily. The trick there was that we never actually saw Talky Tina move about as if possessed. She only spoke — something the doll did anyway — and said eerie things, and then we’d see the aftermath of her movement, which occurred off-camera.

    “Child’s Play” begins that way, teasing us only with hints of Chucky’s abilities, but even then we catch glimpses of him scampering about, darting in and out of doorways and such. By the mid-point, when he’s standing on a counter, gesticulating wildly and threatening an acquaintance, he has ceased to be frightening, but has not yet gone far enough to be legitimately funny. (The innumerable sequels, of which there are four, explored the inherent humor of the situation far better.)

    Chucky is a Good Guy, a line of dolls based on a popular children’s cartoon, or perhaps the other way around. This particular Good Guy came to be alive when notorious killer Charles Lee Ray (Brad Dourif) was pursued by an incompetent police officer named Mike Norris (Chris Sarandon) into a toy store, whereupon Charles Lee Ray was mortally wounded and, before his death, transferred his soul into the nearest item — the aforesaid Good Guy doll. Charles had been dabbling in voodoo, hence his soul-transferring prowess.

    The doll — which looks evil even when it is not inhabited by serial killers — for some reason falls into the hands of a thief who sells merchandise in an alley, which is where one Karen Barclay (Catherine Hicks) buys it for her 6-year-old son, the slow-talking, dim-witted Andy (Alex Vincent). Chucky converses with Andy and moves under his own power, and Andy — being dim-witted, as I mentioned — sees no cause for alarm in this. He is even slow to realize after the babysitter is killed that it must have been Chucky who did it. Andy is indeed the perfect patsy. Every killer-turned-toy should have him for a companion.

    Chucky’s deal is he has to do some more voodoo stuff to transfer his soul back into the body of a human being before the temporary doll housing becomes permanent. But first, he has to get revenge on his old partner, and kill the cop who killed him, and stuff like that. Your standard psycho-becomes-doll-then-seeks-vengeance plot.

    I have issues with 3-foot Chucky’s ability to tackle and fight with grown men. I doubt he would have the leverage or weight necessary to do any serious damage. Clearly this film was not based on a true story.

    It was directed with occasional grim humor by Tom Holland, and written by him, Don Mancini and John Lafia; they all had previous horror experience, and had more afterward. As I said, the sequels found Chucky’s niche more readily, and this first film is worthwhile primarily because it allows you to see Dinah Manoff — one of the frigid daughters on “Empty Nest” — fall from a sixth-story window.

    Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002, with revisions in 2017.)

    It is a small comfort that after the tedious cinematic enema known as “Halloween 3: Season of the Witch,” Part 4 in the series brings back the original villain. I say it is a small comfort because while Part 4 is better than Part 3, it is still worse than, say, being bitten in the retina by fire ants.

    I can picture director Dwight H. Little being jazzed at the chance to direct “Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers” — the film that would put the franchise back on track. He thinks, “I’ve got to make it really scary! How do I do that? Ooh, look, a butterfly!” And he’s sidetracked, and he winds up making the film without ever stopping to consider how to go about bringing terror into it.

    As a result, we have a film that is virtually terror-free, as harmless, bland and ineffective as anything ever produced by Disney’s live-action department.

    It begins on Oct. 30, 1988. Michael Myers, who was killed in a fire at the end of Part 2, apparently was not killed in a fire at the end of Part 2 after all, though he was badly injured. He has been virtually comatose since then, and his muscles surely have atrophied due to underuse. So while being transferred to another hospital, he crushes an attendant’s head with his bare hands, kills the other medical personnel, and escapes. (Why was he being transferred? So he could escape, apparently.)

    His escape fast reaches the melted ears of Dr. Loomis (Donald Pleasence), who also was killed in a fire at the end of Part 2 but who also apparently was not killed in a fire at the end of Part 2 after all, though he was badly injured. His gruesome face is even more gruesome now, what with the burn marks all over it, and he walks with a cane. But he is single-minded in his determination to stop Michael Myers from killing again.

    Like a homing pigeon, Michael heads for his hometown of Haddenfield, Ill., where we have already met his niece. She’s a 7-year-old named Jamie (Danielle Harris), and she’s a basket case waiting to happen. Her mother was Laurie Strode, heroine of the first two films, but she and unnamed Dad died 11 months ago. Now Jamie lives with a foster family named Carruthers, led by two ineffective parents and a teen-age daughter named Rachel (Ellie Cornell). It is Rachel who has to baby-sit Jamie most often, though she’d rather be off fornicating with her tool of a boyfriend Brady (Sasha Jenson), who in the meantime is doin’ Rachel’s slutty friend Kelly (Kathleen Kinmont), who is the sheriff’s daughter.

    Whew. Life is not easy for Jamie. She’s tormented by Michael-centric nightmares, and her classmates ridicule her for being the niece of a maniac. The movie loses all credibility here, because in real life, having a killer for an uncle would make you coolest kid in school. (The kids also make fun of her for being an orphan, though, which seems reasonable.)

    Next thing you know, the movie puts the words “October 31, 1988” on the screen, followed by the helpful clarification, “Halloween,” in case you didn’t know Oct. 31 was Halloween. Michael arrives in town and kills a few folks, notably a power-plant employee named Bucky, whose death causes a power outage. Creepy Dr. Loomis is not far behind his quarry, and he warns the local police that Michael is surely in town. For some reason, they believe him and take assertive action, which made me wonder if I’d somehow put the wrong movie in by mistake. Since when do cops listen to anybody?

    Anyway, there’s killing and chasing and running and screaming and a gross sex scene between Brady and Kelly who of course get killed later as punishment for their deeds. When the patrons at a local bar get wind of what’s afoot, they shape themselves into a drunken posse, led by the mysterious Earl, a character who is called by name several times, but whom I could never pick out of the crowd onscreen. A gaggle of portly men in flannel shirts standing around with shotguns all look alike. Anyway, the posse’s primary function is to accidentally kill innocent people, including the ill-fated Ted Hollister. “Well, s***, Earl, it’s Ted Hollister,” someone says ruefully upon discovering whom they shot instead of Michael Myers. But let us not mourn Ted Hollister, for he is in a better place now.

    It eventually becomes clear that Michael is hunting Jamie specifically, as he has a curious inclination to kill every relative he can locate. The Myers family reunion is, one suspects, a barrel of laughs. At one point, Dr. Loomis begins protecting little Jamie himself, which I thought would make a remarkable sitcom: “The Half-Burned Old Grump and the Traumatized Little Girl.”

    The movie limply continues the story established in the first two films without adding anything new or stylish. None of the deaths is particularly gruesome or clever, and goodness knows there are no surprises in the plot. Until the end, that is, when Jamie touches Michael’s somewhat-dead body and gets evil all over herself and becomes the new Michael, or something like that. All I know is, it makes Dr. Loomis scream like a girl, which is a fitting conclusion to any movie.

    Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002 as part of a retrospective on the “Friday the 13th” series.)

    In “Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood,” we get to hear a narrator tell us the backstory. I don’t know who the narrator is; the credits don’t mention him. It sounds like Donald Sutherland, but I bet it’s not.

    Mr. Narrator reminds us of what has happened to this point in the saga, ending with the fact that at the end of Part 6, Jason was weighted down and drowned in Crystal Lake. Mr. Narrator informs us that “people forget he’s down there.”

    This is just stupid. A man responsible for nearly 100 murders in the space of 10 years does not just disappear from public memory. Furthermore, when Tommy Jarvis drowned the bastard in Part 6, surely the cops and scientists would have then retrieved him, picked him apart, and studied him. His hockey mask would be on eBay. There would be an A&E “Biography” episode about him. People don’t just “forget he’s down there.”

    But the forgetting is necessary for the story to move forward. It will be helpful if you, the viewer, have forgotten a few things, too. For example, remember how in Part 6, Crystal Lake changed its name to Forest Green in order to escape its bloody past? Yeah, go ahead and forget that, because it’s Crystal Lake again now.

    After Mr. Narrator spins his yarn, there’s a prologue (which takes place on Friday the 13th — CREEEE-PY!) in which a little girl who looks like the “Poltergeist” little girl accidentally uses her psychic powers to kill her dad. Surely we all have made errors like this at some point in our lives. It occurs outside the family’s house on Crystal Lake, mere feet from where Jason is chained to the lake bottom, “forgotten” by the locals.

    Next thing you know, it’s several years later. The little girl is grown up and named Tina, and she and her Markie Post lookalike mother have returned to the cabin after apparently having been gone awhile. They’ve returned because Tina’s weird psychic/telekinetic abilities have made her a bit freakish, and a psychiatrist named Dr. Crews wants to “help” her, which really means he wants to use her power for his own gain. (Dr. Crews, by the way, is played by Terry Kiser, who also played the corpse in “Weekend at Bernie’s.” This is an actor whose career consists only of
    low points.)

    So while he’s trying to get Tina to harness her powers, Tina goes out on the dock and tries to use them to summon back her dead father. Instead, she accidentally summons Jason; whoops! He gets right to work and starts killing teen-agers, who are conveniently located in an adjacent cabin, having a surprise party for someone who doesn’t show up because Jason has killed him. It makes you wonder what Jason would do if he were revived on a weekend when no one was anywhere near Crystal Lake. Would he bother hiking into town to kill some folks in a diner? Catch a Greyhound to the next major city? Or just hang out in the woods, waiting for someone to show up?

    The interesting thing about this movie is that it was directed by John Carl Buechler, whose credits also include “Ghoulies 3: Ghoulies Go to College.”

    The second interesting thing about this movie is that it features the return of the unsettling Daisy Duke shorts that men in the 1980s apparently wore ALL THE TIME, if the “Friday the 13th” movies are to be believed.

    The third interesting thing about this movie is that at last, there is something different to do about Jason. In the past, victims have battled him by running, stumbling, and screaming a lot. Usually they give up pretty easily and just let themselves be killed, often because they want out of the movie. But now we have Tina, whose telekinetic powers are far more effective than mere knives or screaming. Good to see someone putting a little effort into things.

    Goodness knows the writer, director and actors didn’t expend much effort. We won’t bother mentioning that the acting and dialogue are atrocious, like they always are. If we don’t mention it, maybe you’ll forget.

    Lethal Weapon

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002.)

    “Lethal Weapon” is a big, dumb movie whose salvation is that its main characters are likeable.

    It comes to us from 1987, when some of its many, many buddy-cop-action-flick cliches may have been fresher. Look at it now and see if it doesn’t sound like a parody: Two cops (one black, one white) are partnered against their will. One goes by the book, the other is a loose cannon. They uncover that most 1980s of plots, the drug-smuggling operation, and the bad guys — who are pure evil — turn it into something personal. Each cop saves the other’s life at least once, and then they are best friends.

    If anything like this works, it works because the audience enjoys the interaction between the characters. Hollywood has proven time and again that the right — i.e., wrong — pairing of actors can lead to laughs; for more recent examples, see Owen Wilson and Jackie Chan in “Shanghai Noon,” or even, in small doses, Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker in “Rush Hour.”

    The hook in “Lethal Weapon” is that Mel Gibson’s character, Martin Riggs, is suicidal over the death of his wife. Not caring whether he lives or dies, he can go a lot further in negotiations with bad guys. This element is never dealt with properly in the film, but a respectable attempt is made.

    Danny Glover is perfectly lovable as Riggs’ partner, Roger Murtaugh, a buttoned-down family man who is “getting too old for this,” as he constantly reminds us.

    Now, as for the movie’s bigness and dumbness, they are considerable. Take the final sequence, in which Riggs opts not to simply arrest the bad guy, but engage in a fistfight with him, with dozens of cops standing around watching. Evidently, someone decided the film had not had enough hand-to-hand combat at that point, so another fight was written in. It’s a great fight, sure, but hard to take it seriously when it occurs on such a shaky foundation.

    Some of the dialogue is questionable, too, as when Riggs tells Murtaugh a joke: “What did one shepherd say to the other shepherd? Let’s get the flock out of here.” A dumb joke in any context, but particularly when they are in the midst of escaping from terrorists who moments earlier were torturing both of them. No doubt a screenwriter loved that joke and wanted to get it in the movie SOMEWHERE, even if it had to be in a place where no person in real life would ever say it.

    But I am being curmudgeonly. “Lethal Weapon” is big, dumb fun, and often genuinely funny and exciting. It’s no sin to enjoy it. Just don’t ever think it’s anything more than big, dumb fun.

    Jason Lives: Friday the 13th Part VI

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002 as part of a retrospective on the “Friday the 13th” series.)

    The sixth installment in the thunderingly mediocre “Friday the 13th” series features no nudity whatsoever. Also, no one falls down while running, no one says, “I’ll be right back,” and there are no cars that won’t start. Surely this is all an editing mistake. Surely the DVD will feature all the lost footage they filmed that somehow was omitted from the final product. Perhaps the plot will be located among the ruins, too.

    One is tempted to believe that the absence of such time-worn slasher-flick cliches will increase the quality of the film, but if one is tempted to believe that, one should watch the movie and realize that one is a moron. I mean, come on, one.

    For in the very first scene, Tommy Jarvis — who has now been played by three actors in as many movies, making him the James Bond of slasher films — heads out to the cemetery to dig up Jason, just to make sure he’s actually dead. This seems like a reasonable thing to do, given Jason’s penchant for not being dead. Except that in Part 5, it was emphatically declared by the foul-mouthed mayor of Crystal Lake that after Jason’s death in Part 4, he had been cremated. The mayor even turned an ashtray upside-down on a desk to make this point.

    Part 6 was both written and directed by Tom McLoughlin, and his clear vision comes through loud and clear: This is a man who has boldly chosen not to watch any of the movies he is making a sequel to. Tommy and his friend Dead Meat find Jason quite dead, but ‘cept then lightning strikes Jason’s body, reviving him and making him angry. (Note: This does not work in real life.) He kills Dead Meat, but Tommy gets away and heads to the police station to warn everyone of the danger they are in. He runs into Sheriff Looks Like Robert Downey Jr., whose unappealing daughter Megan has the hots for Tommy and on that basis believes his story. (His story happens to be true, of course, but I don’t think Megan had a very good reason for believing it.)

    Sheriff Downey Jr. doesn’t buy Tommy’s story, natch, hanging as it does on Jason being alive again. Maybe he’s still working from the old “Jason was cremated” story, I don’t know. Anyway, the townspeople have gone to a lot of trouble to make people forget that old “legend” about Jason — apparently, the murders he committed went unrecorded; that, or several hundred years have passed, making it more a “legend” than a “thing that happened a few years ago” — and they’ve even changed the town name from Crystal Lake to Forest Green. Sheriff Downey Jr. is not going to let this Tommy punk louse all that up with his crazy talk.

    So when teens start getting killed, the sheriff assumes it’s Tommy, acting out some kind of creepy copycat thing. (Indeed, that’s what SHOULD be happening, if the movie had opted to follow through with what it established in Parts 4 and 5.) Megan believes Tommy, though, still based on his cuteness, and they work together to save the people up at the camp.

    Oh, did I forget to mention the camp? Yeah, they’re camping at Crystal Lake — I’m sorry, Lake Forest Green — again. It’s only been a few years since the last Jason killings, but since everyone thinks that was just a legend now, no one’s afraid. They even ship in a bunch of kids, which is admirable, considering the counselors in these movies don’t usually live long enough to actually start working.

    I question the organization behind this camp, by the way. There are only a handful of counselors, and not a single administrator or grown-up to be found. And yet, a busload of kids still shows up, dumps off the youngsters, and roars off into the night. This is a liability nightmare, not helped any by an undead killing machine roaming the woods.

    Jason doesn’t kill any kids; I believe it is part of the Geneva Convention that child murders are not permitted in slasher flicks. He does kill lots of counselors and cops and sheriffs, though.

    Note: This is the first “Friday the 13th” film since the original to actually take place on Friday the 13th.

    There’s too much Jason in this film, which seriously hinders his ability to scare us. There are no Killer-Cam shots — you know, where we see things through the killer’s eyes. There are several times when we see Jason walking by himself through the woods, which ruins the surprise a few moments later, when he kills someone. Rather than being an unknowable menace who shows up occasionally to commit murder, he’s almost the main character. It’s overkill, pardon the pun.

    Second note: This film features an honest-to-goodness car chase. We traded in a bunch of other cliches for a new one, I guess. Hurrah.

    Friday the 13th: A New Beginning

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002 as part of a retrospective on the “Friday the 13th” series.)

    While it is safe to say none of the “Friday the 13th” movies was particularly worth making, I believe Part 5 — “A New Beginning” — is the one that brought the least for our collective edification.

    (Note: “Friday the 13th: A New Beginning” should not be confused with “Little House: A New Beginning,” which is what “Little House on the Prairie” was called during its last season. One was badly written, virtually unwatchable dreck; the other was about a killer with a hockey mask.)

    Instead of picking up where Part 4 left off — with Corey Feldman playing a now-psychotic 12-year-old with the potential to become the new Jason — Part 5 serves merely as a derailing. In fact, you could drop Part 5 altogether and parts 4 and 6 would still fit together (especially since Part 5 adds the detail of Jason having been cremated, which becomes an awkward bit of information in Part 6, when his non-cremated corpse is dug up from its grave). It adds nothing to the mythology of Jason, and is certainly no more or less scary than its predecessors. (It is, however, the only film in the series in which a character says, “I’ll be right back” and then actually comes back.)

    You see, Jason does not appear in “Friday the 13th: A New Beginning,” except in the ludicrous dream sequence that opens the film. Instead, we are subjected to the work of a copycat killer. There are similarities between this and the first film, in that we do not know until the finale who the killer is. Well, unless you have ever seen a movie before, in which case you narrow it down to two possibilities quite early. One of those possibilities would have made it a good movie; the other one — the one the filmmakers chose — makes it very, very stupid.

    The identity of the killer is telegraphed in an obvious manner, thanks to some hamfisted directing from Mr. David Steinmann. Steinmann had previously directed “The Unseen” (1981) and “Savage Street” (1984), notable for featuring a nude Linda Blair. After “Friday the 13th: A New Beginning,” he literally never worked on another film. He is now roaming the forests of New Jersey, I believe, murdering teens at random.

    Part 5 takes a bold new step in the field of teen-murdering. While its predecessors dealt with teens staying at a cabin in the woods, Part 5 is about TROUBLED teens who live at a HALF-WAY HOUSE. OK, so it’s a half-way cabin, and it’s in the woods, but we’ll take any bold new steps we can get.

    Part 5 also returns to the formula established by the previous films (and temporarily abandoned in Part 4), where the non-killing scenes serve only to line up a bunch of characters whom we hate and wish death upon. There’s a foul-mouthed redneck woman and her loathsome, pig-screwing son; a pimpy black man named Demon; a pseudo-jive-talking black kid played by Shavar Ross (who played Arnold’s buddy Dudley on “Diff’rent Strokes”); and others too numerous to mention. We want them to die.

    And die they do! Tommy Jarvis, now a bit older and no longer played by Corey Feldman, keeps seeing hallucinations of his old nemesis, and now it would seem someone is actually posing as Jason and killing folks. This does not ease Tommy’s neuroses any, as you might imagine, and he lashes out here and there against people who deserve it. (Honestly, it’s hard to know who to root for in these things. The murderer, who is heartless, cruel and evil? Or the people he hacks apart, each of whom is offensive enough to deserve a fate far worse than a mere hacking? I never thought my sense of justice and morality would be tested by the “Friday the 13th” series, but I certainly think twice now before condemning accused murderers I read about in the paper. Sure, I think, maybe this guy did slay a few innocent people. But maybe some of those “innocent” people said the F-word a lot and accused local teens of “screwing their heads off” before riding off on a filthy motorcycle driven by their filthy sons.)

    I’m guessing David Steinmann was traumatized after seeing Linda Blair naked in “Savage Street,” because in this movie, he has a trashy diner waitress standing in a public restroom, primping before a date, then flashing her boobs at herself in the mirror and saying, “Show time!” A clear-thinking director does not make his actresses do this.

    “A New Beginning” features classic dialogue such as this:

    LOATHSOME PERSON: I have to take a crap!
    OTHER LOATHSOME PERSON: Crap, my a**!

    There are 21 murders in this installment, the most so far. By the end, the people are dying so quickly, there’s not even time to show the murders. We just stumble on the bodies and assume the faux Jason is responsible. This would have been a good time to kill someone randomly, because you could have written your name and phone number on the victim, and the cops still would have blamed Jason for it.

    The end is a serious letdown, either because you hadn’t figured out who the killer was and were disappointed when you found out, or because you HAD figured it out and were disappointed to learn you were right. You should know that in the end, the killer’s Jason-like hockey mask is placed in someone’s hospital room, apparently as a souvenir, which is questionable enough already, but really just as an excuse for setting up the “creepy” final shot, which is even more askew. We really should permit only grown-ups to make movies.

    Gremlins

    0

    (Written in 2007 for the “Retro Cinema” feature at Cinematical.)

    “Gremlins” was released in 1984, the summer I turned 10. I saw it with my cousin. We loved it. I bought the novelization and read it repeatedly. (It says Gizmo is an extra-terrestrial!) I bought a plush Gizmo toy that squeaked when you shook it. My school folders were festooned with Gremlins stickers, drawings, and other merchandise. To me, “Gremlins” was a perfect horror movie — scary and fun with some humor thrown in for good measure.

    Then I grew up and the Internet happened and I started to read other people’s views on the film. Apparently it was a dark comedy? What?! That scene where Kate tells Billy how her dad died on Christmas Eve — that was supposed to be morbidly funny, not sad? Huh.

    With new eyes I watched “Gremlins” again recently, the first time in at least 15 years. Sure enough, it does play better as a macabre spoof of 1950s monster movies — in fact, that’s the only way the illogical and arbitrary “don’t feed them after midnight” rule can even work: as a parody of illogical and arbitrary rules. Kate’s story really is funny, as are the other juxtapositions of horror and Christmas (Santa Claus mobbed by gremlins, the monsters posing as Christmas carolers, etc.).

    A few things struck me in particular this time around. First, as a protagonist, Billy (Zach Galligan) is pretty useless. He’s painted as a nice guy with ambitions of being a cartoonist, but for some reason he still lives in his parents’ attic, has a dead-end job at a bank, and drives a car that doesn’t work. He’s a loser. He manages to save his mother from a gremlin (after she’s already taken care of three others by herself, thank you very much), and he succeeds in dispatching a theater full of others later on by doing something that doesn’t take much brains or bravery: he sets it on fire. In the climax, it’s Gizmo who saves the day while an injured Billy watches helplessly.

    Billy is also kind of stupid. When Kate tells him she doesn’t celebrate Christmas, he says, “What, are you Hindu or something?” That’s not just insensitive, but clueless, too: In the United States, wouldn’t Jewish be your first guess? I’m just sayin’.

    The larger theme that struck me is the movie’s fascination with other movies, something that makes sense now that I’m familiar with director Joe Dante’s work. (His 1993 film “Matinee” is about a guy making films similar to the kind “Gremlins” is spoofing.) We see actual clips of “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs,” “It’s a Wonderful Life” (which Billy’s mom amusingly refers to as a “sad movie”), “Invasion of the Body Snatchers,” and “To Please a Lady.” The last one is the Clark Gable racecar flick that gives Gizmo his bright idea at the end; without it, he might not have defeated Stripe! “Gremlins” has homages to “It’s a Wonderful Life” and “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” within its own plot, too, of course.

    Furthermore, the villainous Mrs. Deagle (Polly Holliday) is a cross between Ebenezer Scrooge, the Wicked Witch of the West (she threatens to get Billy’s little dog), and “Wonderful Life’s” Henry Potter. In fact, the portrait of her dead husband hanging above her staircase is actually that of Lionel Barrymore as Mr. Potter.

    Other movie references abound, both obvious and subtle. Rockin’ Ricky Rialto’s billboard is clearly an Indiana Jones tribute. The titles on the movie theater marquee are “A Boy’s Life” and “Watch the Skies” — the working titles of “E.T.” and “Close Encounters of the Third Kind,” respectively. An E.T. plush doll appears in the department store toy aisle where Stripe hides. The guy in the bar who praises Billy’s artwork is the legendary animator Chuck Jones. The list goes on and on; check out the IMDb trivia page for more.

    How was the 10-year-old me supposed to catch any of this?

    A random observation: “Gremlins” was a Warner Bros. release, but it uses footage from Disney’s “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.” Can you imagine that kind of inter-studio cooperation today? Not only would Disney say no, but I doubt Warners would even let it get that far. They’d probably “encourage” the filmmakers to use some Warner product instead. (“Couldn’t the gremlins be watching ‘I Am Legend’?”) Not that 1984 was some golden age of filmmaking or anything, but the business has certainly become more cutthroat since then.

    And then there are the plot holes. I don’t mean the “don’t feed them after midnight” dichotomy. (Isn’t any time of day “after midnight”?) I mean things like Billy taking his dog to work with him when there’s no reason for it — no reason except that the screenplay wants to have the dog attack Mrs. Deagle, and it’s the only way to get them together. I mean things like the kids still being in school on Christmas Eve, when in real life public schools recess for the holidays long before then. Speaking of which, why is there an inventors convention on Christmas Eve? If you want to get Billy’s dad out of the film for an hour — a questionable decision in and of itself — there are more logical ways of doing it.

    I assure you, the 10-year-old me had no problem with any elements of the screenplay. What the 10-year-old me loved — and the 33-year-old me concurs — is the scene where Billy’s mom (Frances Lee McCain) battles gremlins in the kitchen. The gremlin in the blender is fantastic enough, what with the liberal spattering of green blood and gore. She stabs another one to death with a knife, and you’re disappointed because it’s shown from an angle that minimizes the gruesomeness. But then they make up for it with the microwave! It was this scene that had many parents concerned about the film’s PG rating, and everyone knows that “Gremlins” and “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom” were the key instigators in the creation of the PG-13 classification. Thank goodness for that exploding microwave gremlin! I’m as delighted by it today as I was 23 years ago.

    I don’t find the movie the least bit scary or horrific anymore, but I do think it’s entertaining. The outrageousness of the bar scene where the gremlins imitate humans; the genuinely impressive puppets and models used for Gizmo and the others; the sick joke of the science teacher winding up dead with a hypodermic needle having been stuck in his leg by a revenge-minded gremlin — that’s good stuff. The useless hero and his bland girlfriend don’t really matter when you’ve got hundreds of monsters singing “Heigh Ho.”

    — Cinematical

    Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002 as part of a retrospective on the “Friday the 13th” series.)

    Part four in the “Friday the 13th” series is called “The Final Chapter.” It should not be confused with part nine in the series, which is called “The Final Friday.” It should also not be confused with the previous three films, which are all vastly inferior to “The Final Chapter” — which, despite its false-advertising title, is actually not a very bad movie.

    I know; I’m just as surprised as you are. A new director (Joseph Zito) was called in, and he displays some signs of competence. Not style or panache, mind you, but competence. Some shots are actually kind of cool, and it appears there was a good deal less cocaine circulating around the set than in past “Friday the 13th” endeavors.

    Some legitimate actors were called in, too. Not John Gielgud or Robert DeNiro, but Corey Feldman and Crispin Glover, anyway. (For the record, Corey Feldman was known as the “John Gielgud” of ’80s actors named Corey. Corey Haim was the “Jason Bateman” of ’80s actors named Corey. Jason Bateman was the “Ricky Schroder” of ’80s actors on “Silver Spoons.”)

    And the characters … well, there are some, which is unusual. I mean, there are always people in the movies, and those people generally have names. But it would be a stretch to call them “characters.” “Bodies” would be more like it. In the past, we’ve never cared who Jason killed, because everyone was either bland or annoying.

    This time around, we have a few people who are somewhat interesting. Feldman plays a little kid named Tommy who is fascinated with the Jason legends, leading to some creepy possibilities (which are squandered in subsequent films, but that’s not “The Final Chapter’s” fault). And Crispin Glover is actually — yes! — FUNNY as a teen who is unlucky at love, and then he gets some action, and then he gets killed. I really, really hoped he would live.

    Now for the bad stuff….

    The film opens mere moments after Part 3 ended … except that Part 3 ended in the morning, and it’s nighttime now. (Honestly, I don’t think they’re even WATCHING the previous movies before they make new ones.) Cops and paramedics are cleaning up the aftermath of Jason’s latest slaughter. Jason himself lies dead in the barn where he was killed several times in Part 3.

    Later, he busts out of the morgue, the rumors of his death apparently having been greatly exaggerated. He kills some morgue attendants (including one who exclaims, humorously, “Holy [deity] jumping Christmas s***!”). Then it’s back to Crystal Lake for him, his homeland, his Mecca, his own private Idaho.

    At the lake, we meet a small family. Mrs. Jarvis is divorced from her husband but maintains her pride and dignity and jogs every morning with her teen-age daughter, Trish, who is approximately five years younger than she. Trish’s little brother is the aforementioned Corey Feldman. They are a happy family. Surely one or more of them will soon die.

    Across the way, some amorous teens (is there any other kind of teen?) have rented/borrowed/stolen a cabin for the weekend. They do their thing. People are killed.

    OK, so the plot is utterly the same as the previous films, up to the finale, which is at least original, if not at all believable. There is also a large amount of nudity, and when the teens aren’t nude, they are wearing the Daisy Duke shorts that made episodes one and two so disturbing.

    With a hint of good acting, a glimmer of character development, and an overall more-professional look than its predecessors, “The Final Chapter” is not bad. It’s not scary, either, which prevents it from being good. But at this point, we’ll take whatever we can get.

    Twilight Zone: The Movie

    0

    (Written in 2007 for the “Retro Cinema” feature at Cinematical.)

    If you were to ask the 9-year-old version of me what the scariest movie ever made was, he would say it was “Twilight Zone: The Movie” — a film so terrifying that I was reduced to tears merely by my father’s description of it.

    Specifically, he was telling us about the opening sequence, the one that begins with Albert Brooks and Dan Aykroyd listening to “Midnight Special” on a cassette tape and ends with Aykroyd saying, “You wanna see something really scary?” and then making good on his pledge. For some reason, the way my dad retold this story — which really is a good campfire-type story, when you think about it — scared the living daylights out of me. I immediately freaked out, sobbing and screaming. The mere idea of the story tormented me, to the extent that I couldn’t actually watch the movie for years to come.

    (If the preceding anecdote gives you the impression that I was a total pansy as a child, that impression is accurate.)

    I did finally watch the film a couple times as a teenager and young adult, and again recently when it was released on DVD for the first time. That prologue with Aykroyd and Brooks? Still pretty great. You don’t know it’s going to have a scary ending because most of it is just the two men talking about old TV shows and their favorite “Twilight Zone” episodes. That “You wanna see something really scary?” bit comes as a shock, an abrupt change in tone that exemplifies “The Twilight Zone’s” single best attribute: the ability to surprise us.

    Released in 1983, “Twilight Zone: The Movie” boasted an impressive pedigree, coming from four directors whose work was already highly regarded (at least in some circles). John Landis had scored with “Animal House” and “The Blues Brothers,” Joe Dante’s “The Howling” was a cult hit, George Miller’s Mad Max films were gaining traction, and Steven Spielberg — well, he was Steven Spielberg, for crying out loud.

    Landis wrote and directed the prologue and the first segment. They’re the only parts not based on a “Twilight Zone” TV episode, but they certainly fit the spirit of the show. In Segment 1, a one-dimensional bigot named Bill (Vic Morrow) loudly proclaims his hatred of Jews, blacks, and Asians, only to subsequently find himself mistaken for each of those persuasions by, respectively, Nazis, the Klan, and American soldiers fighting in Vietnam. In typical TZ style, no explanation is given for the nightmare scenario, and there’s no rhyme or reason to his sudden jumps in time and location. You get the feeling there are only two options: Either he learns his lesson and gets his real life back, or he is killed by one of the racist groups pursuing him.

    Originally, Bill was meant to find some redemption. As everyone knows, however, Vic Morrow was killed by a helicopter while filming one of the Vietnam scenes, along with two young children hired as extras. (The character was rescuing the Asian kids from danger, something an unrepentant Bill wouldn’t have done.) Enough of Segment 1 had already been shot for the story to work, but now it has a non-redemptive ending — which I like, because it makes the story more haunting.

    It also has a shadow cast across it, knowing what happened to Morrow and the kids, and knowing that Landis and company went ahead and released the film anyway, which you could argue was in poor taste. (Definitely tasteless in my opinion: not including a dedication to the three victims’ memory in the closing credits.) Second assistant director Anderson G. House, who had spoken out against the helicopter stunt to begin with, had his name replaced with “Alan Smithee” in the credits. You’ll find a lengthy but fascinating discussion of the whole incident at TruTV’s Crime Library.

    Segment 2 is Spielberg’s, undeniably the worst of the lot, and utterly misguided from the start. It’s a wistful little story about a retirement home where the old people wish to be children again, are granted their wish through a magical game of kick the can, and subsequently realize they don’t want to deal with getting old all over again. The logic behind including this segment is sound, as this story was used in a TZ TV episode, and plenty of other episodes were just as whimsical. Heck, some were out-and-out comedies. The problem is, that’s not what people remember. “The Twilight Zone” is best known for its melancholy tales of horror and supernatural irony. Even if one-fourth of the episodes were lighthearted, it still doesn’t feel right to make one-fourth of the movie that way.

    And that’s apart from the segment’s other inherent weaknesses. I’d always remembered this one as being a letdown simply for its lack of spookiness; watching it again, I see it’s also a letdown for being oversimplified and rushed. The old people are turned young in an instant — and almost immediately, they wish to be old again. This is a story that could have benefited from being extended a little further, its ideas fleshed out. As it stands, it’s perfunctory and simplistic, though there’s no denying Spielberg’s knack for appealing shot compositions and general proficiency. I’d rather watch Spielberg’s worst short film than Uwe Boll’s best feature.

    I did discover a way to make the story more fun, though: Pretend that Scatman Crothers’ character, the one whose mysterious powers make the adults young again, is the devil. Actually, pretending that a random character is the devil probably makes most movies more fun.

    Segment 3, from Joe Dante, is based on the classic TZ episode “It’s a Good Life,” in which a boy has unlimited mental powers, able to wish for and instantly receive anything he wants. The boy who played that role originally, Billy Mumy, appears in the segment as a diner patron. He was also half of the duo behind the classic novelty song “Fish Heads.” Now you know!

    Directed by Joe Dante, this segment is unquestionably my favorite. In my younger days, I admired its out-and-out freakiness, not to mention the enviable powers possessed by young Anthony (Jeremy Licht, later of TV’s “The Hogan Family”). Seeing it again now, I note a couple of things. One, the production design is fantastic, Anthony’s house bearing an unsettling resemblance to the cartoon world he loves; and two, this segment is still pretty creepy. Everything about it, from the “family” members’ skittish behavior to the outright terror that comes later, is pure, unfiltered nightmare fuel.

    And the girl with no mouth! Remember the girl with no mouth?! Holy crap, that’s freaky. That and “Do you wanna see something really scary?” are my most enduring memories of this film.

    The last segment, from George Miller, is based on another famous TZ episode, “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet.” It’s extra-famous now for having starred William Shatner in his pre-Kirk days; in the movie, it’s John Lithgow as Mr. Valentine, a nervous airline passenger who thinks he sees a monster out on the wing, tearing the plane apart during a storm.

    This story is the fun kind of scary (as opposed to the haunting kind), a gleeful roller-coaster ride bolstered by what I’d have to say is the film’s one truly great performance. Lithgow, sweaty and panicked for the entire segment, is fully committed to Mr. Valentine’s terror, and it’s a lot of fun to watch.

    amanda seyfried eyes

    Miller pulls a neat trick about halfway through, when Lithgow opens the window shade and comes face-to-face with the monster. We see the creature’s leering, slimy face up close for about two seconds, then cut quickly to a zooming reaction shot of Lithgow. Except it’s not just Lithgow: He’s got prosthetic eyes that bug out cartoonishly. The shot only lasts five frames, and the goggle eyes are only obvious in the last two. It passes so quickly you’re liable to think it was just a terrified reaction shot and that the huge eyes you thought you saw were merely a trick of the mind. But it has exactly the effect Miller must have intended: to subtly add to the atmosphere of terror.

    What’s a little disappointing about “Twilight Zone: The Movie” is that three of the segments have happy endings, and Segment 1 would have, too, if they hadn’t had to shoot around Morrow’s death. Wouldn’t it have been great to see a cruelly ironic end to the airplane story? Or for the old people to be stuck in their new young bodies, cursing the devilish Scatman Crothers for making them that way?

    Oh well. We can always imagine what happens to Lithgow in that Aykroyd-driven ambulance at the end.

    Halloween III: Season of the Witch

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002.)

    According to our friend the Internet, “Halloween” impresario John Carpenter wanted to further the franchise after Part II but couldn’t figure out a way to do it. So the plan was to release a new Halloween-themed film each October, unrelated to each other except that they dealt with the Halloween holiday itself.

    This lasted exactly one year. “Halloween III: Season of the Witch” was released in 1982 and went on to make about seven dollars before being consigned to the late-night HBO pile, which is the only way anyone I know had ever seen it, until I rented the DVD.

    The way I figure it, Carpenter and Co. made two mistakes. First, if you don’t want people to think it’s a continuation of the story and characters in “Halloween” and “Halloween II,” don’t call it “Halloween III.” I’m surprised this would even need to be pointed out.

    Second, don’t call it “Season of the Witch” if there are no witches in it. Again, this seems obvious.

    So we’ve found two major flaws, and that’s just in the title. Once the movie actually begins, it only gets worse.

    Things begin promisingly enough: An old man clutching a Halloween mask is pursued by men in suits who look like Mormon missionaries but who are actually robots. (Insert automaton-Mormon joke here.) The old man smashes one of the guys with a car and gets away, then winds up in a hospital where his cries of “They’re going to kill us all!” fall on characteristically deaf ears and he is knocked out with thorazine. Then, the missionary he didn’t kill shows up and gouges out his eyes and crushes his skull, all with his bare hands. Immediately after his kill, the assassin sets himself on fire. As far as I’m concerned, the movie can end there.

    Meanwhile, we have met the on-call doctor (and apparently the only doctor in the entire hospital), a beefy, mustached fellow named Dan Challis (Tom Atkins). He’s a drinker with a domineering ex-wife who is the closest the movie comes to an actual witch. He also has two kids whose names I don’t know and don’t want to know.

    He’s pretty disturbed at how the old guy said everyone was going to be killed and then he got killed, so he teams up with the old man’s Flashdance-looking daughter Ellie (Stacy Nelkin) — a good 20 years his junior — to have sex and find the killer. They have no prowess in either activity.

    The trail leads them to the town of Santa Mira (“Saint Look,” in Spanish), home to the Silver Shamrock novelty company. Old dead dad ran a small novelty shop, and he had purchased products from Silver Shamrock just days before his death.

    Santa Mira is a company town, complete with 6 p.m. curfew and Bates Motel-ish lodgings. (There is a scene extremely reminiscent of “Psycho” that is either a rip-off or an homage, it’s hard to tell which. We’ll go with rip-off, since we’re in a bad mood.) The man who owns the town and the company is kindly old Conal Cochran (once-respected British actor Dan O’Herlihy), who surely would not harm anyone and who therefore must be actually be as evil as the day is long.

    For reasons the movie refuses to explain no matter how politely you ask, Cochran plans to use his very popular Halloween masks to kill children and their parents. What happens is, you put on the mask and then you watch a special Halloween-night TV show sponsored by Silver Shamrock. The show gets all mesmerizey, and eventually the mask melts onto your face and bugs and snakes come out of your head and kill you and attack your parents.

    Stonehenge is somehow involved in all of this, I kid you not.

    I’m not especially curious why Cochran wants everyone dead; what reason do you need, really? What puzzles me is why he would use his novelty products to build up a huge audience just to kill that audience. I’m no business planner, but it seems counter-productive to kill every single one of your customers.

    I’m also curious how Silver Shamrock Halloween masks became so popular. There are only three varieties: a witch, a jack-o-lantern and a skull. Yet even kids who are dressing as other things for Halloween are wearing these masks, so we have ballerinas with witch faces and hobos with skull faces, and so on. How Silver Shamrock achieved this level of penetration into the mask market is beyond me, especially given how annoying their TV commercial is. (It’s to the tune of “London Bridge”: “Eight more days till Halloween, Halloween, Halloween/Eight more days till Halloween/Silver Shamrock,” with variations according to how many days till Halloween.)

    There is a reference to some of Cochran’s early novelty products, including the “Dead Dwarf” gag and the “Soft Chainsaw” gag. I would be interested in seeing more information on either or both of these products.

    Quite an assortment of odd, unlikable characters are on hand for the festivities in “Halloween III.” The leads, obviously, are repellent; such is the nature of being a lead in a horror film. But then there’s a gabby man-woman at the motel who accidentally gets melted by a mask, and a family of white trash who drive a Winnebago.

    The finale is ambiguous, but it doesn’t matter. “Halloween 4” was back on the track of parts 1 and 2, and “Halloween 3” was something everyone hoped we’d forget. Were it not for the middle 30 minutes, which take approximately 73,000 hours to watch, forgetting it would be easy.

    First Blood

    0

    (Reviewed in 2001.)

    “First Blood” is a frightening movie. It shows what war can do to its heroes, indicting us as a people for producing men so adept at killing they can do nothing else. It also gives a worst-case scenario in the escalating nightmare that narrow-mindedness and bigotry can cause.

    It also, of course, features a very cool guy doing some very cool things with knives and guns and stuff. That’s all the copycat filmmakers seem to remember these days; they would do well to watch “First Blood” again and see all those OTHER things that are in there, too.

    John Rambo (Sylvester Stallone in his first successful non-Rocky role) is a Vietnam veteran passing through town somewhere in the American northwest. The local sheriff (Brian Dennehy) doesn’t like the looks of him: He could use a shower and a haircut, and we don’t take kindly to drifters in these parts anyway, thank you. Since he rules his podunk little town with an iron fist, he hauls Rambo in for “vagrancy.”

    Soon the other cops are picking on Rambo, too, and soon he’s beating the crap out of them and escaping into the forest. They’ve drawn first blood, so he feels justified in retaliating, which just makes them angrier, so THEY retaliate, too, and it goes back and forth from there. (See the war metaphor?)

    The first scenes in the forest are scary and tense, as Rambo turns the landscape into a horrible maze of booby-traps and ambushes. Unwilling to admit they’ve been defeated by a lone man, the cops call in military backup. But Rambo is a one-man wrecking crew, as they say, and it’s going to take more than guns to stop him.

    Then arrives Col. Trautman (Richard Crenna), Rambo’s commanding officer from the war. It was he who trained Rambo to be the survivalist he is now, able to live off the land and “eat things that would make a billy goat puke,” as Trautman puts it. He’s not here to save Rambo from the cops, though; he’s here to save the cops from Rambo.

    OK, it’s all very exaggerated in a way that will appeal to men and other children, but Stallone really does give a haunting performance. The final few minutes, especially, show great range from the actor, and provide the film with its resonating depth and thought-provoking morality.

    It’s a shame this film became a prototype of sorts for shoot-’em-up, one-man-against-the-world action flicks, because it’s so much better than that. It’s undeniably entertaining on that level, too, but it has more to offer than just a high body count. It’s one of the best movies ever to operate wholly on the level of a bad dream: The instigating factors are not plausible, but what if you DID find yourself in Rambo’s situation, where victory seems more and more hopeless?

    This is a dark drama about war and the exorcising of demons, and an unforgettable one at that.

    Friday the 13th Part III

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002 as part of a retrospective on the “Friday the 13th” series.)

    The most important issue we can address in regards to “Friday the 13th Part III” is consistency. For as similar as these movies all are to each other, they are shockingly bad about continuity.

    This trend even spreads to the very title of this, the second sequel in the now-ten-part slasher series. The onscreen title is “Friday the 13th Part III.” The theatrical trailer, however, said, “Friday the 13th Part 3: 3D.” The video cover just says “Friday the 13th Part 3” and omits the “3D” part, possibly because the video, alas, only comes in two dimensions. (Well, the videotape itself is three-dimensional, obviously. I mean to say the MOVIE is flat.)

    While “III” and “3” in these cases mean the same thing, the fact that someone thought they could be used interchangeably bespeaks a great deal of sloppiness. Movie titles aren’t nicknames or colloquialisms. They’re TITLES, for crying out loud. If your name is Fred, you don’t approve of people spelling it “Fredd” or “Phred.” It’s Fred, dammit, F-R-E-D. No exceptions.

    (When “Star Wars: Episode One — The Phantom Menace” came out, we newspaper types fretted endlessly about getting the punctuation just right: There’s a colon after “Star Wars” and a dash after “Episode One.” The folks at 20th Century Fox were consistent with that, too. None of their promotional materials had “Star Wars — Episode One: The Phantom Menace,” or “Star Wars? Episode One! The Phantom Menace,” or even “Star Wars @ Episode One @ The Phantom Menace.com.”)

    So anyway, “Friday the 13th Part Three” was indeed filmed in 3D. I’m guessing director Steve Miner, fresh off the comparative success of “Part 2,” was wondering how he could make his next sequel seem different despite being 100 percent the same. Then someone suggested 3D, which made sense, it being the third movie and all. (Too bad part four didn’t use the fourth dimension and take itself back in time to a point when film hadn’t been invented.)

    A movie fan at the Internet Movie Database begins his praise of “Friday the 13th Part the Third” with this subject line: “Jason is back!! He gets the hockey mask.” That pretty much sums it up.

    This film takes place the day after the last one, with Jason just having killed several folks at Crystal Lake. Despite this, a group of boldly stupid teen-agers are going to spend the weekend at a cabin on the lake. One presumes they are going to an entirely different part of the lake, as surely the part where Jason just got done killing everybody would be closed to the public for cleaning and fumigation.

    Or maybe not. As I said, we’re not big on continuity. In this film, Jason has no hair and is a bit leaner than he was in the last one, despite it being only a day later. Apparently, he trimmed down and got a haircut between movies — except that, in a flashback that allegedly took place BETWEEN parts 1 and 2, he looks the way he does NOW, in part 3. Which means he was trim and hairless, then beefed up and got a crazy ‘fro for “Part 2,” then went back to his old look again, overnight, for “Part 3.” This guy has more styles than Madonna, and just as many chromosomes.

    Jason also developed superhuman strength at some point. In “Part 3,” he uses his bare hands to squash a guy’s head. This is done only so the guy’s eyeball can pop out at the screen — 3D, remember — with no regard for the power it would take to do it in real life. The filmmakers are inadvertently and randomly building the “myth” of Jason — the Jason who is not just a “frightened retard” (to use one of the characters’ description) who loved his mama, but who is some kind of unnatural and immortal beast.

    Once again, Jason is quite efficient in dispatching his victims (12 this time around, three more than each of the last two movies). He sneaks around stealthily, kills everyone in one blow, and never gets caught. Then, when it comes time to pursue the woman who is by default the “protagonist” and who therefore will live, he becomes embarrassingly sloppy. She pushes him, and he falls down. He gets knocked unconscious by the crudest of tools. Then, when she hangs him and he breaks his neck, he’s still alive. If it weren’t for the fact that he apparently can’t be killed, this clumsy ox would have died in the forest years ago.

    “Part 3” ends exactly the same way the first film did, and pretty close to the second. The main character wakes up in a canoe after having escaped Jason. Then Jason’s mom — who in the first movie was decapitated and had her sweater taken as a souvenir — pops up out of the lake, head and sweater intact, and grabs the girl. Then we cut to her being hauled away by paramedics, the body-out-of-the-lake incident dismissed as a delusion.

    “Part 3” is no better or worse than “Part 1.” Which is to say, it’s very bad, even for a dumb horror flick. At least they’re consistent on that point.

    Halloween II

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002, with revisions in 2017.)

    “Halloween II” picks up exactly where “Halloween” left off, so closely that Part 1 might as well have ended with “To Be Continued.” It follows the aftermath of Michael Myers’ rampage on Halloween night 1978, with survivors being taken to the hospital, victims being mourned, Michael killing again, and so on.

    It’s an interesting variation from what most other slasher films would do, which is to have the movie end with the “death” of the killer, and have the next one pick up a few years later, after everyone has moved on. Even “Friday the 13th” parts 2 and 3, which take place immediately after each other (and immediately after the first), show no sorrow on the part of the survivors over their fallen peers. They simply move ahead to the next murder venue, have some sex, and get killed.

    Not that I’m going to accuse “Halloween II” of having a great deal of heart or compassion. It’s still a slasher flick, albeit a slightly more credible one than most of the films it inspired. It is still about a guy who kills people pretty much for no reason, though reasons are occasionally ascribed to him by screenwriters who feel they must earn the money they’re being paid.

    This time, the obsessive and morose Dr. Loomis (Donald Pleasence) informs us that while in the mental hospital from which he escaped, Michael became acquainted with witchcraft and other things that make Halloween an extra-special day for him. We also are told, via a 5-second flashback and one direct statement, that Michael’s interest in killing Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) is that she is his natural sister. Why he wants to kill his sisters is not explained, though those of us with sisters sort of understand.

    And why did he kill all those other people, too? Just cuz, I guess. At the film’s beginning, the town learns of the murders Michael has just committed. The deaths are reported on the radio before most of the town’s cops have heard about them, which is either a tribute to the resourcefulness of the American media, or bad writing, one or the other.

    Laurie, wounded in the first film, is taken to Haddenfield Memorial Hospital, where she is attended by a drunk doctor and hit on by a soft-looking teen-age ambulance driver. With the exception of a little boy who is in and out quickly, Laurie is the only patient in the entire hospital. (The nursery is full, though, so I don’t know where all those new mothers wandered off to.)

    Michael makes his way to the hospital, stopping off at a random house just long enough to kill a random person and satisfy the audience’s bloodlust, as nearly 13 minutes have passed already and no one has been killed yet.

    Meanwhile, Dr. Loomis is actively involved in screwing things up further. He and the cops chase an innocent kid who happens to be wearing a mask similar to Michael’s into traffic, where he becomes a bystander sandwich between two cars. Loomis expresses mild regret; the cops remain weak and malleable.

    Back in the hospital, there’s a French-looking jackass who hits on a nurse, slips into a hot tub with her, then gets killed by Michael. There’s also a fat security guard who never looks at the surveillance cameras who meets his doom, and a few others here and there.

    Laurie, doped up on medication, whimpers a lot in this movie. She also cowers in corners quite a bit. I’m always glad when movies have strong, dynamic protagonists.

    Director Rick Rosenthal (working from John Carpenter and Debra Hill’s script) creates several long, quiet moments where tension is supposedly building. But since the outcome of each of these scenes is predictable — Michael will appear and kill the person — there is little point in dragging things out.

    One thing the people who make these movies never seemed to learn is that if we don’t care about the characters, we’re not going to care if they die. There’s no suspense in wondering whether someone whose name we don’t even remember is going to be killed.

    Anyway, there are some effectively subtle instances where Michael appears without a loud smash on the musical score. One especially memorable one has him in the background of a shot, through a window. It’s possible you wouldn’t even notice him, and it’s delightfully creepy if you do.

    It seems a little cheap to have a sequel that merely completes the story you SHOULD have told in Part 1, as it makes the whole thing look like a two-part episode of a gory TV show. But as sequels go, this one’s not bad.

    Friday the 13th Part 2

    (Reviewed in 2002 as part of a retrospective on the “Friday the 13th” series.)

    “Friday the 13th Part 2” is actually a little better than its predecessor. Of course, that’s like saying the Vandals didn’t rape quite as many Romans the second time they invaded the city, but still.

    For one thing, as primitive as they may be, there are glimpses of character arcs in the second movie. The blond, mannish heroine, Ginny, says early on that she knows something about child psychology. Later, she uses this knowledge to save herself from the killer. It’s not Eugene O’Neill, but at least someone was trying. The first film is just a smorgasbord of characters who deserve to die.

    For another thing, the sequel is 12 minutes shorter. It’s only 86 minutes, and six of that consists of flashbacks from the first movie.

    I might add that those flashbacks are unnecessary, by the way. Everything they tell us is later told to us in the actual dialogue anyway. Plus, the only two characters from the first movie to carry over into the sequel are also the first two characters killed. There is literally no reason to even include them, except that one of them is the delightful old Crazy Ralph, the bewildered septuagenarian who goes around telling people they’re “doomed” if they go to Camp Crystal Lake. (And of course, he’s right. A prophet is never accepted in his own country.)

    Which means the movie is really only 80 minutes. I can sit through almost anything for 80 minutes.

    Now for why the movie is bad:

    – Every other reason you can imagine.

    It copies the original film almost verbatim, even down to the trick used in the final scene, where serene music plays, signaling the end of the movie, at which point someone we thought was dead leaps into the frame and grabs the heroine. It’s even the same music, for crying out loud.

    The body count is the same, too: five men and four women. In both films, a couple is killed immediately after having sex, both times with a spear that also goes through the bed. Both films feature cars that won’t start and people who say, “I’ll be right back” just before being murdered. Both films have a person whose actual death we do not see, but we know they’re dead because their bodies are used to surprise us later. Both films feature far more men in Daisy Duke shorts than a movie ought to have.

    The villain in the sequel is the infamous Jason, of whom you have no doubt heard tell. He supposedly drowned in the lake when he was a young boy because the camp counselors who were supposed to be watching him were having sex instead. (Have sex, or watch the dumb kid swim. I’m not sure which I would choose, either.) It was that drowning that sent his mother over the edge, and it was she who killed all those camp counselors in the first movie.

    Apparently, however, Jason wasn’t altogether dead, which means his mom kind of overreacted. He’s been living in a filthy shack in the woods all these years, no doubt looking at Internet porn and writing anti-government manifestos. He is, as one character puts it, probably a “frightened retard.” Now, five years after his mom’s rampage (though the movie came out only one year after), the camp is being reopened, and he’s getting revenge on the people who killed his mom five years ago. Well, not the actual people, of course. One of them, yes. The rest are guilty only because they, too, are teenagers who work at a summer camp. It makes you wonder just how well thought-out Jason’s plan is. Does he intend to kill every camp counselor in the world? The ones in Brazil, for example, are no more or less culpable in his mother’s murder than the ones at Crystal Lake. And to be fair, she really did have it coming, what with having killed nine people to avenge the death of her son — who turned out to be alive anyway. It’s the sort of big, embarrassing mix-up that we’ll all laugh about one day.

    Anyway, Jason doesn’t wear his famous hockey mask yet in this movie. He has a KKK-looking hood over his head, the reason for which becomes apparent when we see him without it and realize he has been the victim of a very bad makeup artist. I’d cover my head in shame, too.

    So he kills a bunch of teens and cops and old guys, and we’re led to believe he kills a dog, too, but thank goodness, it turns out the dog lived! Everyone else is dead, though. None of it is scary, though a lot of it is bloody, in case you’re one of those people who thinks they’re the same thing.

    Friday the 13th

    (Reviewed in 2002 as part of a retrospective on the “Friday the 13th” series.)

    For years now, horror fans have held that “Friday the 13th,” despite its shortcomings, is a significant film because it was instrumental in launching the genre of teen slasher movies. This may be true, but it overlooks two crucial facts: Teen slasher movies don’t make for a very good genre anyway, and “Friday the 13th” is a dreadful piece of trash.

    The original 1980 film has spawned nine sequels, plus the crossover “Freddy vs. Jason.” Let us take this opportunity to re-examine this “landmark” film and discuss any merits we happen to stumble across within it.

    The film begins with a prologue set in 1958. In this prologue, more or less stolen from “Halloween” (witness the killer’s point of view throughout), two counselors at Camp Crystal Lake are gettin’ frisky in the attic when darned if someone doesn’t come along and kill them.

    We skip to the present (well, 1980), where a smiling but clearly unintelligent girl named Annie is on her way to Camp Crystal Lake to work as a cook for the summer. Seems that after a couple decades, the place is being reopened. All the townsfolk call it “Camp Blood,” and Annie is warned by a doddering bicyclist that she is “doomed” if she goes there. The redneck who gives her a lift in his truck tells her several hundred times to quit. She blithely ignores all the counsel and is murdered by an unseen slasher on her way there. (Don’t worry, you won’t miss her.)

    Meanwhile, at the camp, we are introduced to a scrawny band of horny teens, all of whom smoke weed so much that now they only wear Daisy Duke shorts. These are the counselors for the upcoming camp season, and the guy in charge of them — a curly-haired porn star of a fellow named Steve — has had an ill-defined relationship with one of them. The lucky gal and allegedly our main character (insofar as she is the only one who doesn’t die) is Alice, who is so nondescript and dull as to warrant never mentioning her again in this review.

    Steve goes into town to do goodness-knows-what, leaving the teens behind to be killed. This occurs with methodical precision and admirable efficiency, and usually to a soundtrack stolen outright from “Psycho” and “Jaws,” as though someone said, “THOSE movies were scary; we should probably use their music to make OUR movie scary, too.”

    One of the teens is Kevin Bacon. He gets killed immediately after having sex, and we see half of his butt being scratched by the girl with whom he’s doin’ it. Later, Kevin Bacon was in “Hollow Man.” I don’t know that Kevin Bacon’s career has really progressed much.

    Nearly every cliche now associated with slasher films is present in “Friday the 13th.” People who fall while running, people saying “I’ll be right back” and then not coming back, idiotic cops, teens having sex, cars not starting, people supposedly being dead and then turning out to be alive and very angry, a killer who proves to be very incompetent indeed once he or she is actually challenged face-to-face — it’s all here. I will grant you that in 1980, most of these things were not cliches yet. You will have to grant me, however, that the acting, dialogue and story in “Friday the 13th” are pitiful. Being cliched is the least of its problems.

    The DVD includes the original theatrical trailer, in which we are shown the deaths of several people — which removes any possible suspense over who will live and who will die. It’s clear no one ever expected us to watch the movie for any reason other than the thrill in seeing people we don’t know or care about being butchered.

    For that matter, there’s no suspense over who the killer is, either. The film’s point of view is omniscient; that is, we are privy to the thoughts and actions of all characters, not just a select few. When a murder is being committed, we are often shown what’s going on simultaneously back in the cabins. This gives everyone an alibi, and we know the killer is not one of the characters we already know. Which means, who cares who it actually turns out to be? Just some random psycho, or someone with a grudge, or a strange act of God. Everyone winds up just as dead either way.

    Despite the trailer’s promise of 13 murders, there are only nine in “Friday the 13th.” Just another example of the film failing to live up to itself.

    Kramer vs. Kramer

    0

    (Reviewed in 2001.)

    Any parents thinking of divorce should be court-ordered to watch “Kramer vs. Kramer.” After seeing it, if there is even a dim chance of reconciliation, they’ll take it, rather than inflict their separation upon their children. That’s how powerful this movie is.

    Having grown up in a blessedly unbroken home, I have no personal experience with warring parents or custody battles, but the emotions reflected in the movie seem genuine. My memory of the film from its release is that MAD Magazine called its parody “Crymore vs. Crymore.” That seems about right.

    Set in Manhattan’s tony Upper East Side, the film begins with up-and-coming advertising whiz Ted Kramer (Dustin Hoffman) coming home from a particularly exhilarating day at the office to find his wife Joanna (Meryl Streep) leaving him. He has neglected her, to some extent, but her problems may be more internal. Well-educated and talented, she has been wasting away as a housemom for six years, caring for their son Billy (Justin Henry) and letting her more marketable skills go to waste. She needs to “find herself,” a popular activity in those days (1979).

    Ted goes through the anger and denial stages of grief, then zips ahead to weary acceptance. He is unacquainted with his wife’s breakfast-making and walking-to-school techniques, but Billy quickly teaches him. For his part, Billy remains heartbroken over his mother’s abandonment for much of the film, even as he is simultaneously won over by his father.

    Director Robert Benton, who adapted the screenplay from Avery Corman’s novel (supposedly with input from a recently separated Hoffman), is marvelously succinct in his storytelling. The film covers almost two years of time, yet clocks in at an hour and 45 minutes. One scene halfway through of Ted and Billy’s morning routine — getting up, eating breakfast, reading the newspaper and a comic book — tells us everything we need to know about the comfortable relationship they’ve established, particularly in contrast to an earlier scene in which all of those elements were disastrous — and it’s only about 90 seconds long, too. Another brief scene of Ted attending Billy’s school play not only shows his status as a now-reformed workaholic, but also helps establish the passage of time: It’s a Halloween play, which means several months have passed since Joanna left.

    Benton earned Oscars for his writing and direction, and the film won Best Picture. Hoffman and Streep earned Oscars, too, and they deserve them. Hoffman, who has often played unusual characters, here excels at being an Everyman, a modern professional whose life is rearranged by a child, a movie cliché that he pulls off without a trace of melodrama. And Streep, who disappears for most of the film then returns for a custody hearing, nails every scene she’s in, giving us the full range of her feelings in a few deft strokes.

    I do wish Justin Henry were a little better as young Billy, but I suppose super-talented actors that age are hard to come by. Considering how effective the mere situations are, I can only imagine how much more devastating they’d be if I actually believed he was being affected by them. I was affected enough, and I was only watching.

    Halloween

    0

    (Reviewed in 2001, with revisions in 2017.)

    For better or worse, “Halloween” began the modern teen slasher genre. It came before “Friday the 13th” (which was clearly inspired by it) and was far superior to it, establishing tension and avoiding cheap scares. Where subsequent slasher flicks would focus on the blood and murdering, “Halloween” had very little blood and only five murders — one of which occurred offscreen.

    The film’s prologue is among the creepiest I’ve seen. It is Halloween 1963. A girl goes upstairs to fool around with her boyfriend, unaware they’re being watched by someone. Through the watcher’s point of view, we see the boyfriend leave; then we head upstairs, find the girl naked in her bedroom … and we stab her. Then we go downstairs and outside the house, where the point of view finally shifts and we realize the murderer is a little boy. Creeee-py.

    The rest of the film takes place 15 years later. The boy, Michael Myers, has been in a psychiatric facility and has not spoken a word since the murder. His doctor, the lugubrious Sam Loomis, played by the inappropriately named Donald Pleasence, is on his way there to make sure he’s not released on parole. Apparently, despite the boy not having spoken a word in 15 years, much less committed any additional crimes, Dr. Unpleasence is convinced he is incapable of being rehabilitated. Dr. Doom-and-Gloom is not what you’d call a bleeding-heart liberal, to put it mildly.

    Anyway, while at the facility, a clumsy nurse lets Michael steal her car and head back to his hometown of Haddonfield, Ill. (Michael does this so easily, one suspects the nurse did it on purpose.) How can a man who has been in a mental institution since the age of 6 drive a car? Good question. When someone in the movie asks it, Dr. Morbid says, “Maybe someone around here gave him lessons!” He says it very accusingly, like it’s a foregone conclusion. I say if you’re going to bring up the plot holes in your movie, you should fix them, too, not just make them worse with stammering explanations.

    Back in Haddonfield, the old Myers home is considered haunted by local kids, and probably a few episodes of “Scooby-Doo” centered around it. Dour teen Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) doesn’t pay it no never mind, though, and is not afraid to live in the neighborhood. In fact, this very night — Halloween, no less — she is set to babysit a little boy who lives just around the corner from it, all by herself in the dark with scary movies on TV.

    Laurie is an interesting character, insofar as she is the protagonist despite being utterly devoid of personality. She has two friends, Annie and Lynda, who hate each other and her.

    Sure enough, Michael shows up in town, and Dr. Creepy gets the local sheriff to help him keep an eye out. It’s the rare instance in horror films where the cops actually believe the town’s in danger, but they don’t do anything about it — issue APB’s or put the word out on the radio — for fear of creating a panic. Once again, the movie paints itself into a corner and then just tramps all over the fresh paint to get out.

    There are surprisingly few murders, considering how many you find in subsequent films of this genre (and of this series, for that matter). Carpenter also wins points for some spine-tingly camera set-ups and extended shots, the calmness of which almost makes you forget you’re watching a horror film.

    He doesn’t win any points for that damn musical score, though. He wrote it himself, and it has two themes. The most famous one is that four-note piano riff, which is perfect for the mood of the film. The other one, though, is all cheesy synthesizers and goofy crap, and it drives me crazy. Awful, awful stuff.

    I am amazed at how little time it takes people to have sex in Haddenfield, Ill. The opening sequence has Michael’s sister and her boyfriend doin’ it, in real time, and it takes no more than one minute. Later, another amorous couple gets it on, once again with no cutting away, and once again it is over in mere seconds. The girl remarks that it was “fantastic,” too, which makes me wonder just how much sex she’s had.

    Donald Pleasence’s performance is calculated and chilling, and I like it. Jamie Lee Curtis doesn’t do much but scream (though not as much as she’s famous for — only three real screams in this film), and it’s hard to get behind a main character who’s so unexciting. But maybe it’s Michael Myers who is the real main character. In which case, mission accomplished: I’m freaked out.

    Blacula

    0

    (Written in 2007 for the “Retro Cinema” feature at Cinematical.)

    The No. 1 film in America last weekend, with more than $21 million at the box office, was Tyler Perry’s “Why Did I Get Married?” — and I don’t know a single person who saw it. That’s not a reflection on the movie’s quality, nor do I mean to suggest that somehow those figures aren’t accurate. All it means is that I’m white, and that almost everyone I know is also white, and that the few black friends I have are irreligious males, not the Christian females that are Tyler Perry’s most ardent supporters.

    For someone who’s used to being in the racial majority, it’s strange to realize that a movie can be THAT popular and still be entirely disconnected from my world. It’s kind of cool, actually — especially when you consider that barely 35 years ago, no one was making movies specifically for black audiences at all.

    With that in mind, I watched “Blacula.”

    “Blacula” came out in 1972 and was one of the first so-called “blaxploitation” films. The definition of that genre is fluid, and you could argue that many films classified under the category don’t fit because they were made by black directors and crew members, and were thus not exploitative.

    “Blacula” is more about empowerment than exploitation. The title character is Mamuwalde (William Marshall), a refined and eloquent African prince who, in the year 1780, visits Count Dracula at his castle as part of a diplomatic mission to end the slave trade. Dracula, unsurprisingly, is racist (among his other, better-documented faults) and responds by vampirizing Mamuwalde and sealing him and his still-living wife in a tomb.
    Mamuwalde next awakens in the present (that is, 1972) when Dracula’s castle is purchased by an interracial gay couple, interior designers who bring all the furniture and coffins back to L.A. because they think vampire stuffy is kitschy. (The gays are always on the cutting edge of style.) Unfortunately for them, Mamuwalde arises from his coffin with a thirst for blood, and their bodies contain a lot of it, and their primary defense when this strange dude suddenly gets out of a presumed-empty coffin is to just stand there and look at him.

    Mamuwalde is next seen lurking around the funeral parlor where the black interior designer will be memorialized. Why he would do this, I don’t know. I’m not even sure how he got in, since it’s daytime. At any rate, the dead guy’s friends are there, and one of them is a woman named Tina (Vonetta McGee) who looks just like Mamuwalde’s beloved wife Luva. Luva died almost 200 years ago, of course, but Mamuwalde doesn’t seem to realize how much time has passed. Then again, he’s not fazed by cars or telephones, either. My guess is that Mamuwalde just isn’t thinking things through very carefully.

    He befriends Tina (after freaking her out at first) and starts dating her. Tina’s sister Michelle (Denise Nicholas), meanwhile, is dating one Dr. Gordon Thomas (Thalmus Rasulala), who has a connection to law enforcement that is not adequately explained. He’s a doctor, not a cop, but he investigates deaths, too, but he’s not part of CSI or the coroner’s office. He’s a sharp dresser and he has a mustache, though, which automatically makes him the hero in a 1972 black movie.

    Gordon’s looking into the recent strange deaths that have involved bite marks and that have left the victims sapped of their blood — a detail which seems to have escaped the small, elderly coroner. It’s worth noting that this coroner is a white man whom Gordon bosses around, a motif that reverberates through this and most blaxploitation films.

    Now, I could make fun of “Blacula” all day. Its exceedingly low budget and inattention to plot details are often hilarious. The scene where Mamuwalde finally explains everything to Tina, who proves to be remarkably easy-going about the whole I’m-dating-a-vampire situation, is priceless.

    But I am impressed by how seriously the filmmakers seemed to take it, apparently trying to make a fairly straightforward horror film. The title — which I suspect was conceived first, before the story — is silly, but the movie isn’t, or at least not intentionally. Only Dracula ever calls Mamuwalde “Blacula”; the word is never heard again in the film. (It can be heard dozens of times in the trailer, though — I guess then, as now, trailers didn’t always represent their movies accurately.)

    It’s hardly even a “black” movie, but rather a vampire movie that happens to have black characters. Most of the racial elements are subtle, like the aforementioned theme of Gordon being talented and effective while the white authority figures are useless. The white characters aren’t prejudiced against the black ones (except for one cop who observes that they “all look alike”), nor do the terms “honky” or “cracker” appear, as they often did in the more blatant black-vs-white films of the ’70s. In fact, the only people who get derogatory treatment at all are the ill-fated gay couple, who are casually referred to as “faggots” after their deaths. On the other hand, they were an interracial couple at a time when even interracial straight couples weren’t looked upon favorably, in movies or in real life, so maybe the film was being progressive there, too.

    As a vampire movie, “Blacula” is certainly not the worst I’ve seen. (That would be “Dracula 2000.”) A few scenes are genuinely creepy, and director William Crain (who would go on to make “Dr. Black & Mr. Hyde,” naturally) did what he could with his limited resources to create an appropriate atmosphere for a horror movie, while maintaining the funky music and hip attitudes that black audiences responded to. Considering that horror and blaxploitation are two genres that easily lend themselves to campiness, “Blacula” is probably as good a combination of the two as could be expected. Whether Tyler Perry’s films, despite being more technically proficient, are any better, is a matter for another day.

    Operation Last Patrol (documentary)

    0

    (From a review of the 2006 DVD release.)

    When the Vietnam Veteran Against the War (VVAW) marched on the Republican National Convention in Miami in 1972, an amateur filmmaker named Frank Cavestani tagged along and created the documentary “Operation Last Patrol.” The 56-minute film, never theatrically released, is now seeing the light of day on DVD.

    I wish I could say it’s a fascinating document of a turbulent time in American history, and a well-made movie to boot, but I’d be lying on both counts. In fact, it’s an unfocused yawner, following a convoy of protesters as they drive from California to Miami, march through the city, and try to disrupt the convention — all of which was probably extremely exciting for those involved, but none of that comes through in the film.

    What we get instead are miles of footage of soldiers-turned-hippies driving cars, talking about their experiences in Vietnam, taking breaks to skinny-dip in rivers and lakes, sleeping outside, and complaining about the “pigs” who are always harassing them. Where most documentaries use captions to tell us people’s names, this one has none. So we don’t even know who anyone is, and no “main characters” emerge.

    Cinema Libre Studio, which is releasing the DVD, would have you believe otherwise. The name Ron Kovic is plastered all over it; you may recall he was the paraplegic veteran played by Tom Cruise in “Born on the Fourth of July.” Kovic is indeed featured in “Operation Last Patrol,” but in no way is he the central figure. (He wasn’t famous yet then, so Cavestani didn’t know to focus on him.) Kovic is one of many veterans who tell their stories and march on Miami. For an interesting biography of him, you should check out “Born on the Fourth of July.”

    It is compelling to note the parallels between the events documented here and the current situation in Iraq. I smiled to see people who opposed the Vietnam War being dubbed “unpatriotic” just as those with correspondent sentiments are treated today. It makes you realize all over again that when we don’t learn from history, we’re doomed to repeat it.

    It Had to be U

    0

    (To the tune of “It Had to Be You.”)

    As a child I dreamed that someday
    When the time came, I’d go away
    To BYU
    That’s what I’d do, Where I’d go.

    But then the time came that I had to apply
    Show my merits off to the Y
    And when they saw all of my flaws,
    They said, NO!

    So,
    It had to be the U, and not BYU
    I had to admit that I couldn’t quit a habit or two

    And my GPA was less than okay
    My transcripts I tried, wanted to hide, my 1.2

    All others I’ve tried have also denied.
    Even UVSC didn’t want me, I was overqualified.

    The Y told me no, the U they were thrilled.
    With all of my faults, they took me still.

    It had to be the U,
    The Devil Red U
    It had to be the U.

    Manos: The Hands of Fate

    0

    (Reviewed in 2002.)

    Before “Mystery Science Theater 3000” made it legendary, “Manos: The Hands of Fate” had deservedly been forgotten by history. It was not a cult-classic bad film like “Plan 9 from Outer Space,” nor had it been a big-name or big-budget disaster like “Waterworld” or “Ishtar.” I doubt it ever played anywhere outside its native El Paso, Texas, where a fertilizer magnate financed, wrote, directed and starred in it. It was a non-entity.

    Then “MST3K,” that mixed blessing of a brilliant television show, brought it to our consciousness. The makers of that show declared it the worst film they’d ever watched, which made it more notable than other offerings on the series, and now it is something we all must reckon with.

    People unfamiliar with how “MST3K” works may feel that the worse a movie is, the more enjoyable it is to watch when your intent is to heckle it. This is not the case with “Manos.” “Manos” is virtually unwatchable without the aid of Joel and the ‘bots and their merciless mocking. The cast members of that show have described their own horror at having to view the film several times; indeed, writer Mary Jo Pehl observed, “There were many times during the writing process when we simply couldn’t make comments, so caught up in the wretchedness of this movie were we.”

    Did you catch that? These are people who made a living at commenting on wretched movies, yet THIS one was SO wretched, they often were at a loss for words. I do not advise anyone to watch “Manos: The Hands of Fate” unassisted. It’s not “so bad it’s good”; it’s just bad.

    The plot is as follows: Michael (Hal Warren, also director/producer/etc.) and Margaret (Diane Mahree) are going for a weekend trip with their little girl, Debbie (Stephanie Nielson), when a wrong turn takes them to a weird little lodge in the middle of the desert. It’s run by The Master (Tom Neyman), and assisted by Torgo (John Reynolds), a dim, lubricious, other-worldly man who immediately starts hitting on Margaret and creeping everyone out.

    What is The Master the master of, you ask? Good question. We know he has a bevy of semi-dead wives out in the backyard, and that they do weird cult stuff and summon “Manos,” whoever that may be; jokes about the Mormons should be kept to yourself, thank you. We also know The Master is not a very good boss, occasionally abusing Torgo and at one point burning his hand off.

    Anyway, Michael can’t even get his car started, much less make his shrill wife or daughter shut up, and for as much evil and repulsiveness as the film contains, it’s actually quite dull.

    What makes “Manos: The Hands of Fate” noteworthy is that every aspect of it is badly done. Writing, directing, acting, cinematography, sound, lighting, sets, costumes, music, plot, character — it’s all inept and worthless. With most bad movies, at least you can tell professionals were making it. For example, “Freddy Got Fingered” may be an awful film, but at least everything is framed properly in the picture. And “Armageddon” is really stupid, but at least you can hear people when they talk.

    I’ll tell you who should see this movie without the “MST3K” hecklings: film students. They need to see what evil can be unleashed when they are careless, lazy, or on cocaine. Just as “Citizen Kane” is a textbook example of how to make a quality film, “Manos: The Hands of Fate” is exemplary in showing us, step-by-step, how to make a bad one.

    When You’re a Bum and Life is Wretched and Homely, There’s One Place to Go: Downtown

    Ihave worked on Main Street for three-and-a-half years, and I’ve lived in the general area all my life, so I know what I’m talking about when I say that Main Street is beginning to resemble a ghetto, except that no comical television programs have ever been made about people living on Main Street.

    From time to time, I look up from my extremely complex work (which usually pertains to answering the phone and putting people on hold) and look out at Main Street through the window. From that vantage point, I see anything from a tightly-clad hooker, to a stumbling drug addict, to any one of a large assortment of people whose pianos are missing a few octaves, if you know what I mean. It’s no wonder downtown business is falling off.

    The City Council has noticed the lack of customers on Main Street, and It’s decided that It should alleviate the problem NOT, as one might suppose, by eliminating the two-legged scum, but by dressing up the storefronts. This is akin to telling a man with severely violent mental disorder that he can get a girlfriend by wearing nice clothes.

    So They spent approximately one and a half hillion jillion dollars making the stores look old, ignoring the foolish people who insisted they were old, all in the hopes of attracting customers to Main Street who aren’t afraid to get out of their cars and actually brave the sidewalks.

    Once the storefronts had been redone, the City moved on to the next step in the “Lake Elsinore — Hot Dang!” program. This step involved putting round-looking sidewalk protrusions on one block, which reduces the amount of parking in that area. This means that people will supposedly be attracted to downtown businesses, but they won’t be able to shop at them because there won’t be anyplace to park, which probably won’t matter, since it’s unwise to leave your car unattended on Main Street anyway. What we need are some good drive-thru businesses.

    So what is the solution? Funny you should ask. I think the city councilors need to get their collective heads out of their collective armpits and acknowledge the fact that Main Street attracts transients the way the Lotto attracts people on welfare and that THAT is why downtown business is waning. Once they’ve acknowledged that, they need to take all of the — for want of a better word — people who can’t prove that they are currently employed in some legal, non-chemically-related occupational field and give them one-way Greyhound tickets to Vancouver. I don’t wish to sound cold and heartless, but I’m growing weary of calling the police every other day because the “residents” are doing something obnoxious, like spreading roofing tacks all over the place, or harassing some poor fool who thought a nice after-dark stroll along Main Street would be a pleasant change of pace. (Change of FACE is more like it.)

    But maybe that system won’t work. To quote my grandfather, who owns a downtown business: “I can just see the ACLU coming down and saying, ‘You can’t do that! You can’t violate these people’s right to break my windows and urinate in my parking area!'”

    Gramps doesn’t care much for the ACLU, and he’s somewhat bitter about his problems with the locals. Maybe he should be grateful he still has a parking area.

    Protest-ant Reformation

    Ever since the Gulf War began, people have been asking me when I was going to write a humorous column about it, and I have begun to feel like a Pompeii resident asked to think of something funny to say about lava.

    Now, if my editor would let me, I could probably write enough Persian Gulf material to fill this entire newspaper. As it is, I have been limited to 20 inches. I suggest you write an angry, obscenity-ridden letter to my editor (his name is Eric Grimm) and complain about this injustice.

    At any rate, the War topic I have chosen is: ANTI-WAR DEMONSTRATORS. These people began sprouting up like weeds almost before the missiles hit the ground, chanting such catchy slogans as “No Blood for Oil!” and “Peace Now!” and “Ice Ice Baby!” They would stand in the streets, yelling and marching for peace, starting riots and getting in fights, and doing everything that good, peace-loving citizens would do, if they had a few beers in them.

    Don’t get me wrong. I have nothing against war protestors, and I would probably be on their side, were it not for the fact that I think they are completely wrong and should be DRAGGED OUT IN THE STREET AND SHOT LIKE RABID SQUIRRELS!

    Pardon me. I sometimes become irrational when I’m talking about the war, particularly when it comes to those IGNORANT MORONS WITH PICKET SIGNS AND LOUD VOICES WHO GO AROUND PROTESTING LIKE A BUNCH OF COMMUNIST WEASELS!!

    Again, you’ll have to excuse my behavior.

    The reason I am not an anti-war-related person is that I don’t think the war is really such a bad idea. To quote George Bush, I think it was the “butt-kickin'” thing to do. (Or perhaps it was Dan Quayle who said that. It doesn’t matter.)But the people who are against it are against it, for the most part, because they don’t want to trade blood for oil. “No blood for oil!” is their motto, and I think that sums it up quite nicely.

    Now here, I can see their point. They think the only reason we are in this war is for low gas prices. If they are right — if we are fighting for oil — then I say to that: “So what?”

    I mean, if we were fighting for dirt, or fighting for Ginsu knives, or fighting for sole broadcast rights to “Charles in Charge,” well, then, yes, I would be against it. But oil is a pretty darn important part of the American way of life. If we didn’t have oil, we wouldn’t have gas. And if we didn’t have gas, we wouldn’t have smog. And if we didn’t have smog, then all those government-appointed, tax-fed Smog Reduction Committee Persons would be out of work, which would raise the unemployment rate, which would cause President Bush to go on TV one night and frown and say words like “prudent” and “juncture,” and I think the last thing this country needs is a frowning president, particularly during times of crisis like these. So oil is pretty important.

    But all of this is beside the point, because oil isn’t the only reason we’re there. We are also there because Saddam Hussein did a naughty thing, and the United States, having been named by the United Nations to be the Pushy Over-Bearing Mother to the World, had to go and beat the snot out of him.

    Now I can hear you anti-war persons saying, in a gravelly, hoarse voice that sounds like it has been yelling a lot recently, “If that’s why we’re fighting, then why don’t we go force China out of Tibet, Russia out of Lithuania, and Japan out of America?”

    The reason is that those countries aren’t run by crazy people who would take over the whole world if given half a chance (well, I guess Japan is). Hussein, though, isn’t likely to stop at Kuwait. I know I wouldn’t. “This is it?” I would say, in Arabic. “All it is is a bunch of sand! I’d better go invade another country, too!” And I imagine that’s what Hussein would do, too, if we let him.

    I think the main reason that people are protesting is that it’s the trendy thing to do. A lot of them have parents who protested the Vietnam War, so it just seems like the natural thing to do for this one. Many of the protesters, I think, aren’t even aware of most of the circumstances surrounding the conflict, and if they were, I think a lot of them would change their minds. It’s like Dan Quayle. People make fun of him because he’s relatively young and has made a few slips of the tongue. But I’m sure that if we investigated, we would learn that he’s also an idiot who drools on himself.

    So maybe that was a bad example.

    Authentic Colonial Humor

    Last week, as you’ll recall, I promised to continue the account of the East Coast trip that my school chums and I recently took, feeling that if I had to live through it, so should you. So here are some amusing anecdotes.

    AMUSING ANECDOTE #1: We spent much of the first day in the colonial town of Williamsburg, which has been preserved to look just the way it did in the 1700’s, except that it was probably interesting to the people who lived there, most of whom are dead now.

    My four pals (Aaron, Gabe, Scott, and Tyler) and I amused ourselves by attempting to determine exactly which things on the block were Authentic Colonial Things and which had had to be Reconstructed. We didn’t actually care, of course, but we really, really wanted to bug Katherine, the stone-faced, humorless tour guide. So we’d ask her things like, “Is that an Authentic Colonial Tree?” and “Is that an Authentic Colonial Dog?” and “Is that Authentic Colonial Dirt?” and so on.

    AMUSING ANECDOTE #2, WHICH IS SOMEWHAT RELATED TO AMUSING ANECDOTE #1: One of the buildings at Williamsburg is the old printing press. Or perhaps it was the clothes store. One of them is relevant to this anecdote, but I don’t remember which. At any rate, the person at whichever one it was told us that in the 1700’s, that place hired mainly women because, as he told us, “they work for less.”

    When he said that, we could see Katherine bristle because she was an Authentic Colonial Women’s Libber. At the moment, this detail is irrelevant, as is the whole anecdote, probably, but it will seem important in a few paragraphs.

    Also, we happened to notice that there was a major Authentic Colonial Horse Pile in the road, left by an Authentic Colonial Horse. This will also seem relevant in a few paragraphs.

    After approximately four eternities, Katherine told us that the tour was over and that we had an hour or so to kill by ourselves before Elvis, the bus driver, was going to show up and take us to the Authentic Colonial McDonald’s for lunch. Before going off on her merry way, though, she asked if there was anything else she could do for us. I, being the Authentic Colonial Humorist that I am, said in a very joking, smiling manner, “Why don’t you go clean up that horse pile?” Mind you, I didn’t mean anything by this; she asked what she could do, and I told her. Jokingly.

    She didn’t take it that way, though. She said, in a voice you might use if someone had just shot a dart at your neck, “Now, why would you ask me to do that?”

    Before I had a chance to answer, however, Aaron showed just why he is my best friend: He came to my rescue and said something even stupider than what I had said. He said, and I quote, “Because you’re a woman, and you work for less.”

    Needless to state, this did not set well with Katherine, who proceeded to call Aaron every Authentic Colonial Name in the book. The whole group burst out laughing, and we all went to lunch.

    And she never did clean up that horse pile.

    Controversy, Shmontroversy

    Some of you may have read about the recent controversy surrounding the April Fool’s issue of The Tiger Times, which is the student newspaper at Elsinore High School, a school that used to be a lot of fun but isn’t anymore for the simple fact that we can’t get away with anything anymore. We have to start learning.

    I happen to be the copy editor for that fine publication, so for this particular column, I know what I’m talking about. Things were up in the air for a while as to whether we would be allowed to put out another issue, or if they were going to solve the problem by just expelling us all and firing the adviser and trashing the computers and setting fire to the publishers’ office. They finally found a new adviser and told all of us, “Naughty, naughty” and we were then free to put out a couple more issues, but only under the following restrictions:

  • We could not state, directly or indirectly, subtly or outright, in any news, feature, sports, or editorial story, that Mr. Price, the principal, is actually Norm from “Cheers.”

  • We could not publish anything until it had all been read and approved by Mr. Price, Mr. Davis, a member of the school board, the ASB President, assemblyperson Steve Clute, columnist Dave Barry, my friend Aaron, everyone’s mothers, General Norman Schwartzkopf, and any high-ranking official in the Catholic church, such as Mother Theresa or one of the Kennedys.

  • Except for retractions and heart-wrenching, sobbing apologies, we could not mention the April Fool’s issue, because if you ignore a problem, it will go away.

    That last one caused a problem because we had already conducted a survey of a large number of EHS students to see what they thought of that issue. Since we couldn’t print the results in The Tiger Times, here they are in my column. I am not making any of these results up.

    Of the 179 polls returned:

  • 48 percent had only good things to say about the issue

  • 32.5 percent felt the issue had some bad parts, but overall was OK

  • 18.5 percent felt the issue was obscene and distasteful.

    Some of the comments the students wrote were rather amusing. One person wrote, “I thought it was the stupidest paper I ever read.” We really did not take that one too seriously, since he or she misspelled the word “stupidest.” Four people said they didn’t read it, several said they didn’t care, and two people (we’re guessing they were freshman males, passing time while waiting for their voices to change) said it wasn’t obscene enough. We intend to alleviate that problem next year.

    There were many more interesting comments, ranging from the obscene to the merely illiterate, but I think you get the picture.

    And there you have it. The results of our poll. I think we can conclude from this that:

    1. The students of Elsinore High School generally liked the April Fool’s issue.
    2. Some of them should be in counseling and English class a little more often.

    Speaking of the school newspaper, I was going through my old tape recordings a few weeks ago when I came across a hot news story that for some reason was never published. It involved the altering of the large marquee in front of Elsinore High School — the one that heralds the coming of such noteworthy school functions as “Cafeteria Workers Appreciation Week” (celebrated by having everyone buy a burrito from them whilst stifling the urge to say, “Eewwwwwww!”).

    Apparently, according to my notes, someone got a hold of some of the letters used to put messages on the marquee, snuck into the school with a ladder about 5:00 one morning (he was seen by a custodian who thought he was supposed to be there), and changed the marquee to read:

    “WELCOME TO TIGER TOWN!
    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH”

    Principal Dennis Price was absolutely livid, and the message was removed before second period. He was threatening suspension and a stiff fine for the scoundrel, who was never caught. Price made it sound like whoever it was must have been a juvenile delinquent on the brink of first-degree manslaughter, but I seriously doubt that any delinquent at Elsinore High School — and believe me, there are many — would have the literary background to take a quote from Orwell’s “1984” and place it so brazenly on the school marquee. I think one of the English teachers did it.

  • Your Thong

    I sat on the beach
    And looked out at the sea,
    And some of the people, well they,
    They looked good to me.
    Then I saw you standing there
    And it made my smile fade.
    It’s for people like you that long pants were made.

    So excuse me for staring,
    But I can’t look away —
    Your horrible flabby cheeks,
    Your thighs a shade of gray.
    Well, the thing is,
    Your body’s really obscene.
    Yours is the fattest butt I’ve ever seen.

    And I can tell what the problem is:
    It is your thong.
    It’s really too tiny and
    It just looks wrong.
    I hope you don’t mind, I hope you don’t mind, that I put in this song
    How horrible you look when you wear a thong
    I hope you don’t mind, I hope you don’t mind, that I gouged out my eyes —
    I couldn’t stand seeing after I saw your thighs.

    Piano Man

    It’s 9:05 on a Sunday morn,
    The 39th ward straggles in.
    The bishop comes up to me
    And says, “It’s time to begin.”

    He says, “Eric, can you play us some prelude, please?
    Something to set the right tone.
    If you play it just right, it might make them be quiet,
    And then we’ll get this show on the road.”

    La-la-da-diddy-da
    La-la-diddy-da-la-la-la

    Play us some hymns, you’re the piano man,
    Play us some hymns today.
    We don’t mean to enslave you, but it’s the calling we gave you,
    Besides, you’re the only one who can play.

    I’m asked to accompany soloists
    Who sing at farewells for missionaries.
    They sing that song I can’t stand, “In the Hollow of thy Hand,
    By that brilliant composer Janice Kapp Perry.

    And today we’re singing “Sweet Hour of Prayer”
    For the 27th time this year.
    Oh, that song was really nice until I’d played it twice;
    Since then, it’s gotten tiresome, I fear.

    La-la-la-diddy-da

    Play really well, Mr. Piano Man,
    It’s the only job you’ll ever do.
    Playing three songs a week must be quite a feat,
    And we don’t wanna overwork you.

    I practice about 17 hours a day,
    No time to go look for a wife.
    And it’s a little bit scary, but I’m playing for Primary
    And probably will be for life

    And I play in the lobby at Helaman Halls,
    “On My Own” from “Les Miserables.”
    The girls stand around me and each sing in a different key
    And that makes my head start to throb.

    La-la-la-diddy-da
    La-la-diddy-da
    On my own

    Play some “Les Mis,” you’re the piano man,
    Play some of “Phantom,” too.
    Oh, all night we’ll stay here and say you’re a great player,
    But we’ll never go out with you.

    My Siamese Twin Fiancee

    When I first met you that day
    I knew I never wanted to be away
    From you, I knew that someday we’d be wed.
    But I knew that even while we were engaged,
    There might be times when we’d be away
    From each other, and the thought filled me with dread.

    So when I proposed, I suggested something to keep you close to me.
    Some people joke that engaged couples are “joined at the hip”; and I took that literally.

    When I proposed to you
    And you agreed to our merger, we
    Went right into surgery
    And we came out as one.
    Now we are conjoined —
    Two arms, two legs, two heads for us,
    Till the wedding, it’s separate beds for us,
    Though that’s easier said than done.

    And I never have to worry about us being apart
    ‘Cause I know that your blood is being pumped by my heart.
    And we’re not just sharing our lives: We’re sharing DNA
    We’re together every moment, my Siamese twin fiancee.

    People think we’ve gone to extremes,
    And some people look at us and scream
    And run away, but they just don’t understand.
    Everything you freely give me;
    You’ve got my heart, and I’ve got your kidney,
    I love cuddling on the couch, holding your/my/our hand.

    I’m glad your internal organs have meshed so well with mine
    And we made that tux/gown combo, so at the wedding, we’ll look fine.

    I used to have two lungs of my own,
    But I haven’t even missed ‘em
    ‘Cause I’m sharing a respiratory system
    With my literal right-hand gal.
    And I’m looking forward
    To a bright and happy future,
    Soon as they remove the sutures,
    And the scars all heal as well.

    And our prenuptial agreement says if we ever get divorced
    You’ll get the car, the house, the kids — but I’ll keep the intestines, of course.
    But I know that will never happen: We’ll be together till our final day.
    I’m attached to you, and you’ve grown on me — my Siamese twin fiancee.

    What doctors have sewn together,
    Let no man put asunder,
    We’re sort of like the Wonder
    Twins, except without super powers.
    And there’s some compromise —
    You’ll have to come to my bachelor party,
    But don’t get smug, my dear sweetheart —
    I’ll be at your bridal shower.

    And then that happy day will come, when I’ll take you for worse or for better.
    And the wedding will be over in half the time, ‘cause we’ll march down the aisle together.
    And I hesitate to say this, because it might be a cliche:
    But you complete me, my Siamese twin fian–
    There’s no one else’s side I’d rather be on;
    When to use the bathroom is something I hope we agree on,
    ‘Cause you’re not someone I’d want to have to pee on —
    [ad lib apology]
    But as I was saying, you complete me, my Siamese twin fiancee.

    I am so Handsome

    I am so handsome and strong that whenever I go to the beaches
    The girls cannot keep their eyes off of me; in fact, I leave them speechless.
    I look so cute in my little bathing suit
    That the girls they all hoot and the guys they salute
    And secretly wish they could be as handsome as me.

    I can kiss any girl that I choose; I’ve proven that often.
    And even if I died in a fiery wreck, girls would still kiss me in my coffin.
    What I have got is a body that’s hot
    And what I have not? Personality. So what?
    I am still handsome, and therefore I’m better than you.

    I may be as dumb as a box of dirt, it doesn’t matter.
    ‘Cause I’d rather be dumb and handsome and thinner than smart and ugly and fatter.
    Concern for my looks is what keeps me movin’
    Only skin deep? That hasn’t been proven.
    I am so handsome, I’ll bet it goes down to my bones.

    I can go out with two girls at once — a cute and tasty “me” sandwich.
    And when I have two handsome sons of my own, they’ll be named Abercrombie and Fitch.
    The girls love me and I can’t blame them, can you?
    And what can I do — even guys like me, too
    I am so handsome, I transcend societal norms.

    Girls will say they’ll like a guy if a sense of humor he’s got.
    But of course they’re all lying, what they actually want is a guy who is sexy and hot.
    And I’m glad to help out, ’cause I sure fit the bill,
    And I will till I die, then it says in my will
    That my beautiful face should be bronzed and put on display
    In the Smithsonian…
    ‘Cause I am so handsome, they’ll never get tired of me.

    Don’t Know Why

    I’m much too fat to wear a thong,
    Don’t know why I put it on
    It’s stretched tighter than a drum,
    Don’t know how I put it on,
    I don’t know how I put it on.

    All my friends told me to try
    To lose weight before July.
    But I failed, but couldn’t admit
    That this thong just doesn’t fit.

    I wish the store could take it back
    But it’s slipping through the cracks,
    It’s gone forever.

    ‘Cause of this thong from Brazil
    I’m making everybody ill.
    I’m embarrassed in the sun.
    Don’t know why I wore a thong,
    I don’t know why I put it on,
    I don’t how I put it on.